| Literature DB >> 23833722 |
Badal Rathi1, Subhash Bodhankar, V Mohan, Prasad Thakurdesai.
Abstract
Cinnamon bark (Cinnamomum zeylanicum Syn C. verum, family: Lauraceae) is one of the oldest traditional medicines for inflammatory- and pain-related disorders. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the polyphenol fraction from Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark (CPP) in animal models of inflammation and rheumatoid arthritis. Dose-response studies of CPP (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg) used in a separate set of in vivo experiments were conducted in acute (carrageenan-induced rat paw edema), subacute (cotton pellet-induced granuloma), and sub-chronic (AIA, adjuvant-induced established polyarthrtis) models of inflammation in rats and the acetic acid-induced writhing model of pain in mice. Effects of CPP on cytokine (IL-2, IL-4, and IFNγ) release from Concanavalin (ConA)-stimulated lymphocytes were also evaluated in vitro. CPP showed a strong and dose-dependent reduction in paw volume, weight loss reversal effects against carrageenan-induced paw edema, and cotton pellet-induced granuloma models in rats. CPP (200 mg/kg p.o. for 10 days) showed a significant reduction in elevated serum TNF-α concentration without causing gastric ulcerogenicity in the AIA model in rats. CPP also demonstrated mild analgesic effects during acute treatment as evidenced by the reduction in the writhing and paw withdrawal threshold of the inflamed rat paw during the acetic acid-induced writhing model and Randall-Selitto test. CPP was found to inhibit cytokine (IL-2, IL-4, and IFNγ) release from ConA-stimulated lymphocytes in vitro. In conclusion, CPP demonstrated prominent action in animal models of inflammation and arthritis and therefore can be considered as a potential anti-rheumatic agent with disease-modifying action.Entities:
Keywords: Antiinflammatory; Cinnamon bark; Rheumatoid arthritis
Year: 2013 PMID: 23833722 PMCID: PMC3700084 DOI: 10.3797/scipharm.1301-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
Fig. 1HPLC spectra of CPP at 280 nm.
Effect of CPP against carrageenan-induced rat paw edema in rats
| Vehicle control | 2.60 ± 0.07 | 3.65 ± 0.21 | 4.81 ± 0.21 | 5.23 ± 0.13 | 66.00 ± 7.8 |
| Celecoxib (10, p.o.) | 2.75 ± 0.07 | 3.55 ± 0.15 (23.44) | 4.43 ± 0.17 (24.04) | 4.18 | 90.00 |
| CPP (50, p.o.) | 2.79 ± 0.07 | 3.70 ± 0.19 (12.76) | 4.72 ± 0.17 (12.81) | 4.84 | 74.3 ± 4.08 (12.63) |
| CPP (100, p.o.) | 2.72 ± 0.10 | 3.24 ± 0.13 (12.28) | 4.28 ± 0.05 (29.54) | 4.48 ± 0.09 (33.19) | 75.00 |
| CPP (200, p.o.) | 2.47± 0.10 | 3.30 ± 0.10 (21.05) | 3.91 | 4.05 | 81.0 |
n=6, Data is represented as Mean paw volume (ml.) ± SEM. and was analyzed by Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttests. Significance represented as
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle at respective time point. PWT…Paw withdrawal Threshold.
Effect of CPP in cotton pellet granuloma- and acetic acid-induced writhing model in rats
| Vehicle control | 44.67 ± 1.60 | 29.17 ± 0.48 |
| Celecoxib (10, p.o.) | 25.23 ± 0.47 | 13.83 ± 0.60 |
| CPP (50, p.o.) | 32.47 ± 0.49 | 25.33 ± 1.05 (13.16) |
| CPP (100, p.o.) | 29.30 ± 0.81 | 23.83 ± 1.30 (18.31) |
| CPP (200, p.o.) | 27.28 ± 1.25 | 22.00 ± 1.53 |
n=6, Data is represented as Mean value ± SEM. and was analyzed separately for each parameter by One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s t test. Significance represented as
P < 0.05,
P < 0.001 as compared to vehicle control.
Effect of CPP on Body weight, Paw edema, and serum TNFα levels at baseline, Day-12 and Day-21 post-sensitization in FCA-induced established polyarthritis (AIA model)
| Body weight (g) | 0 | 171.00 ± 1.67 | 170.17 ± 1.99 | 170.17 ± 1.99 | 173.33 ± 3.02 | 170.33 ± 4.29 |
| 12 | 141.00 | 159.17 | 159.17 | 162.50 | 158.00 | |
| 21 | 136.33 ± 2.40 | 188.33 | 188.33 | 195.17 | 197.67 | |
|
| ||||||
| Paw Volume (ml) – Injected – Left | 0 | 2.67 ± 0.14 | 2.47 ± 0.17 | 2.56 ± 0.13 | 2.13 ± 0.08 | 2.47 ± 0.15 |
| 12 | 5.75 | 5.28 | 5.59 | 5.18 | 5.25 | |
| 21 | 5.65 ± 0.09 | 3.18 | 4.24 | 3.31 | 3.40 | |
|
| ||||||
| Paw Volume (ml) – Contralateral – Right | 0 | 2.16 ± 0.15 | 1.99 ± 0.13 | 1.96 ± 0.14 | 2.18 ± 0.03 | 2.03 ± 0.41 |
| 12 | 3.44 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.65 | 3.60 | |
| 21 | 3.90 ± 0.16 | 2.81 ± 0.14 | 3.78 ± 0.45 | 3.15 ± 0.08 | 2.26 | |
|
| ||||||
| TNFα levels (pg/ml) | 0 | 20.05 ± 0.25 | 28.86 ± 0.48 | – | – | 33.53 ± 0.42 |
| 12 | 49.63 | 47.82 | – | – | 47.45 | |
| 21 | 52.58 ± 2.44 | 33.72 | – | -– | 37.40 | |
n=6, Data is represented as Mean parameter value ± SEM. The data for each parameter was separately analyzed by Two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttests. Significance represented as
P < 0.001 as compared with baseline (day-0) values of same treatment group.
P < 0.001 as compared to Day-12 values of same treatment group.
Fig. 2Photomicrograph of sections of stomach on Day 21 of the study. The figures show sections of stomach of rats with absence of arthritis (A) and FCA-induced arthritis-induced rats with 10-day treatment of vehicle (distilled water) (B), celecoxib (10 mg/kg, p.o.) (C) and CPP (200 mg/kg, p.o.). Arrow indicates erosion with hemorrhage at the superficial part of the mucosa. Stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) X 200.
Effect of CPP on IL2, IL-4, and IFN-γ in ConA-stimulated lymphocytes in vitro
| Control | 1.94 ± 0.24 | 25.02 ± 1.03 | 20.41 ± 0.54 |
| ConA (40 μl) | 589.00 ± 8.8 | 114.75 ± 3.89 | 277.74 ± 7.26 |
| CPP (100 μl, 0.4%) | 10.27 ± 0.26 | 41.22 ± 1.90 | 21.98 ± 1.03 |
Each reading is mean of triplicate readings obtained from ELISA assay. Data was analyzed by Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni posttests.
P < 0.001 as compared with Control,
P<0.001 as compared with ConA treated group test.