Literature DB >> 23831473

Foreskin retractility following hypospadias repair with preputioplasty--medium term outcomes.

Jins Kallampallil1, Supul Hennayake.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the medium term outcome of hypospadias repair and preputioplasty with regard to foreskin retractility, and whether this could be predicted by assessing retractility at the end of the operation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data were obtained from a prospectively maintained database regarding patients who had hypospadias repair with preputioplasty between January 2003 and June 2010. The foreskin retractility at the end of the operation was documented in the operation notes, and the latest foreskin status was obtained from clinical notes or by contacting parents.
RESULTS: The total number was 207, and 170 (82.1%) had distal hypospadias. At the latest follow up at a median of 2 years and 3 months after the date of operation (range 13 months to 4 years 7 months), 159 boys (76.8%) had a retractile foreskin, 27 (13%) were under observation for a tight foreskin, and 8 (3.9%) had undergone circumcision due to tightness. The foreskin was retractile at the end of the operation in 154 (73.3%) patients. Of these, 130 (84%) had a retractile foreskin at the later follow-up clinic. Of the 49 patients who had a non-retractile foreskin at the end of the operation, 29 went on to have a retractile foreskin, while 20 had a tight foreskin. Fisher's exact test showed that foreskin retractility at the end of the operation has a significant relation to foreskin retractility in the medium term, and that patients with distal hypospadias have a greater probability of achieving a retractile foreskin.
CONCLUSION: A primarily retractile foreskin can be achieved in over 75% with less than 4% requiring a circumcision due to tightness. Distal location of hypospadias and retractility at the end of operation predicted success. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foreskin reconstruction; Foreskin retractility; Hypospadias; Hypospadias repair; Preputioplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23831473     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  4 in total

1.  Foreskin reconstruction at the time of single-stage hypospadias repair: is it a safe procedure?

Authors:  Riccardo Manuele; Carlotta Senni; Kalpana Patil; Arash Taghizadeh; Massimo Garriboli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Benign penile skin anomalies in children: a primer for pediatricians.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Mike Leonard; Luis Guerra; Ciro Esposito; Marcello Cimador
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 3.  Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery - a review.

Authors:  Alexander Springer
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Does Preputial Reconstruction Increase Complication Rate of Hypospadias Repair? 20-Year Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Michele Gnech; Lorenzo Angelini; Waifro Rigamonti; Vincenzo Bagnara; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.418

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.