PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in contrast sensitivity after surgery for macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). DESIGN: Prospective, interventional, consecutive, case-control study. METHODS: This study included 84 eyes of 84 patients with unilateral macula-on RRD undergoing primary scleral buckling or vitrectomy without postoperative macular complication. We examined the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA) and contrast sensitivity at 4 spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree) using the CSV-1000E (Vector Vision) before and after surgery. From the data obtained with the CSV-1000E, the area under the log contrast sensitivity function was calculated. The logMAR BCVA and contrast sensitivity in the contralateral normal eyes also were measured and were used as normal controls. Clinical data were collected, including age, gender, surgical procedures, the number of retinal tears, circumferential dimension of retinal tears, and area of retinal detachment, to determine the clinical factors related to visual function. RESULTS: Preoperative contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in eyes with RRD than in normal controls, but the preoperative logMAR BCVA was not different from that of normal controls. Contrast sensitivity decreased significantly after surgery, but logMAR BCVA did not change by surgery. Multiple regression analysis revealed that postoperative contrast sensitivity had a significant correlation with the circumferential dimension of retinal tears, whereas no clinical parameters were associated significantly with postoperative BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for macula-on RRD did not change visual acuity, whereas contrast sensitivity was affected significantly in association with the extent of retinal tears.
PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in contrast sensitivity after surgery for macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). DESIGN: Prospective, interventional, consecutive, case-control study. METHODS: This study included 84 eyes of 84 patients with unilateral macula-on RRD undergoing primary scleral buckling or vitrectomy without postoperative macular complication. We examined the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA) and contrast sensitivity at 4 spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/degree) using the CSV-1000E (Vector Vision) before and after surgery. From the data obtained with the CSV-1000E, the area under the log contrast sensitivity function was calculated. The logMAR BCVA and contrast sensitivity in the contralateral normal eyes also were measured and were used as normal controls. Clinical data were collected, including age, gender, surgical procedures, the number of retinal tears, circumferential dimension of retinal tears, and area of retinal detachment, to determine the clinical factors related to visual function. RESULTS: Preoperative contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in eyes with RRD than in normal controls, but the preoperative logMAR BCVA was not different from that of normal controls. Contrast sensitivity decreased significantly after surgery, but logMAR BCVA did not change by surgery. Multiple regression analysis revealed that postoperative contrast sensitivity had a significant correlation with the circumferential dimension of retinal tears, whereas no clinical parameters were associated significantly with postoperative BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for macula-on RRD did not change visual acuity, whereas contrast sensitivity was affected significantly in association with the extent of retinal tears.
Authors: Merina Thomas; Rebecca F Silverman; Filippos Vingopoulos; Megan Kasetty; Gina Yu; Esther L Kim; Amro A Omari; Katherine A Joltikov; Eun Y Choi; Leo A Kim; David N Zacks; John B Miller Journal: J Vitreoretin Dis Date: 2020-11-05
Authors: H Fukuyama; H Yagiri; T Araki; H Iwami; Y Yoshida; H Ishikawa; N Kimura; K Kakusho; T Okadome; F Gomi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Salvatore Di Lauro; Melissa Castrejón; Itziar Fernández; Jimena Rojas; Rosa M Coco; María R Sanabria; Enrique Rodríguez de la Rua; J Carlos Pastor Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 1.909