Literature DB >> 23831162

Evaluation of the appropriateness and outcome of in-hospital telemetry monitoring.

Nina Fålun1, Jan Erik Nordrehaug, Per Ivar Hoff, Jørund Langørgen, Philip Moons, Tone M Norekvål.   

Abstract

The American Heart Association classifies monitored patients into 3 categories. The aims of this study were to (1) investigate how patients are assigned according to the American Heart Association classification, (2) determine the number and type of arrhythmic events experienced by these patients, and (3) describe subsequent changes in management. A prospective observational study design was used. All patients assigned to telemetry during a 3-month period were consecutively enrolled in our study. Data were collected 24/7. Only arrhythmias that might require a change in management were recorded. Monitor watchers at the central monitoring station completed a standard data sheet assessing 64 variables. These data, as well as medical records, were reviewed by the investigator. Overall, 1,194 patients were included. Eighteen percent of the patients were assigned to American Heart Association class I (monitoring indicated), 71% to class II (monitoring may be of benefit), and 11% to class III (monitoring not indicated). The overall arrhythmia event rate was 33%. Forty-three percent of class I patients, 28% of class II patients, and 47% of class III patients experienced arrhythmia events. Change in management occurred in 25% of class I patients, 14% of class II patients, and 29% of class III patients. Although the number of class III indications should have been reduced, nearly 1/2 of class III patients experienced arrhythmia events and 1/3 of them received management changes. This outcome challenges existing guidelines. In conclusion, most patients in this study were monitored appropriately, according to class I and II indications.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23831162     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

Review 1.  Health Informatics via Machine Learning for the Clinical Management of Patients.

Authors:  D A Clifton; K E Niehaus; P Charlton; G W Colopy
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  Association of Implementation of Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring With Nurses' Knowledge, Quality of Care, and Patient Outcomes: Findings From the Practical Use of the Latest Standards of Electrocardiography (PULSE) Trial.

Authors:  Marjorie Funk; Kristopher P Fennie; Kimberly E Stephens; Jeanine L May; Catherine G Winkler; Barbara J Drew
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-02

3.  Effect of default order set settings on telemetry ordering.

Authors:  David Rubins; Robert Boxer; Adam Landman; Adam Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Benefit of continued noninvasive cardiac monitoring in geriatric trauma: A retrospective review of geriatric pelvis, hip, and femur fractures and analysis of cardiac events during immediate post-traumatic course.

Authors:  Karleigh R Curfman; Daniel S Urias; Thomas J Simunich; Byron D Dodson; Shawna L Morrissey
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2021-10-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.