Literature DB >> 23831144

Public reporting of surgeon outcomes: low numbers of procedures lead to false complacency.

Kate Walker1, Jenny Neuburger, Oliver Groene, David A Cromwell, Jan van der Meulen.   

Abstract

The English National Health Service published outcome information for individual surgeons for ten specialties in June, 2013. We looked at whether individual surgeons do sufficient numbers of procedures to be able to reliably identify those with poor performance. For some specialties, the number of procedures that a surgeon does each year is low and, as a result, the chance of identifying a surgeon with increased mortality rates is also low. Therefore, public reporting of individual surgeons' outcomes could lead to false complacency. We recommend use of outcomes that are fairly frequent, considering the hospital as the unit of reporting when numbers are low, and avoiding interpretation of no evidence of poor performance as evidence of acceptable performance.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23831144     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61491-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  25 in total

1.  Re: postoperative complications do not affect long-term outcome in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Lorenzo E Ferri; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  [Minimum numbers in surgery].

Authors:  A Buia; E Hanisch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Heuristics and bias in rectal surgery.

Authors:  Ewan MacDermid; Christopher J Young; Susan J Moug; Robert G Anderson; Heather L Shepherd
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Improving the quality of liver resection: a systematic review and critical analysis of the available prognostic models.

Authors:  Chetana Lim; Cornelius H Dejong; Oliver Farges
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Postoperative Mortality after Liver Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Development of a Risk Score and Importance of Biliary Drainage of the Future Liver Remnant.

Authors:  Jimme K Wiggers; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Kasia P Cieslak; Alexandre Doussot; David van Klaveren; Peter J Allen; Marc G Besselink; Olivier R Busch; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Dirk J Gouma; T Peter Kingham; Thomas M van Gulik; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Testing the construct validity of hospital care quality indicators: a case study on hip replacement.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Hester F Lingsma; Helen A Anema; Job Kievit; Ewout W Steyerberg; Niek Klazinga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Identifying positive deviants in healthcare quality and safety: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jane K O'Hara; Katja Grasic; Nils Gutacker; Andrew Street; Robbie Foy; Carl Thompson; John Wright; Rebecca Lawton
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Should surgical outcomes be published?

Authors:  Evelyn Chou; Hamid Abboudi; Mohammed Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Ranking hospitals on avoidable death rates derived from retrospective case record review: methodological observations and limitations.

Authors:  Gary Abel; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates vary considerably depending on the method used to calculate them: a retrospective observational population-based study of PCCRC in the English National Health Service.

Authors:  Eva J A Morris; Matthew D Rutter; Paul J Finan; James D Thomas; Roland Valori
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.