Literature DB >> 23830828

Outcome of surgery for rheumatoid cervical spine at one institute over three decades.

Hiroshi Miyamoto1, Masatoshi Sumi, Koki Uno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical intervention is a therapeutic choice for atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS), vertical subluxation (VS), and subaxial subluxation (SAS) associated with rheumatoid cervical spine. However, the long-term outcomes of different subgroups remain unclear, although rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a progressive disease even after surgery.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of surgery for various subgroups of rheumatoid cervical spine, performed at a single institute over three decades. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: One-hundred eighteen seropositive RA patients treated at one institute over the past three decades. Atlantoaxial fixation was performed in 28 AAS patients. Occipitospinal fusion was performed in 41 irreducible AAS or VS patients. Laminotomy with autologous bone fusion was performed in 22 patients, anterior fusion in 5, laminoplasty in 4, and posterior decompression/fusion with instrumentation in 12 with SAS.
METHODS: Clinical outcomes using the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, complications, deterioration of RA, and mortality rate during the follow-up were investigated from preoperation to more than 10 years after surgery in the subgroups. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were compared among the subgroups.
RESULTS: Patients with AAS exhibited significantly better clinical outcomes throughout the follow-up period compared with patients from the other subgroups. Patients with SAS had the worst neurologic status even at preoperation, and the symptomatic improvement achieved by surgery deteriorated within less than 5 years. Deterioration of outcome was caused by occurrence of complications and deterioration of RA during the follow-up. The mortality rates at 5 and 10 years after surgery were 20% and 33%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of surgery for rheumatoid cervical spine was different in the various subgroups and associated with the occurrence of complications and deterioration of RA.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; Outcome; Prognosis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23830828     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of Stroke in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Alicia M Zha; Mario Di Napoli; Réza Behrouz
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  [The rheumatic cervical spine].

Authors:  M Schroeder; W Rüther; C Schaefer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 3.  Cervical spine manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: a review.

Authors:  Nathan A Shlobin; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Update on imaging of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Mostafa Ellatif; Ban Sharif; David Baxter; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Adverse outcomes following hand surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Victor M Menchaca-Tapia; Elizabeth M Rodríguez; Irazú Contreras-Yáñez; Martin Iglesias-Morales; Virginia Pascual-Ramos
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 6.  Advances in the treatment of cervical rheumatoid: Less surgery and less morbidity.

Authors:  Grant W Mallory; Sasha R Halasz; Michelle J Clarke
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

7.  The impact of steroids, methotrexate, and biologics on clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing fusions at the craniovertebral junction.

Authors:  Ryan Khanna; Brian J Dlouhy; Zachary A Smith; Sandi K Lam; Tyler R Koski; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

8.  Surgical treatment of the severely damaged atlantoaxial joint with C1-C2 facet spacers: Three case reports.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tominaga; Anna MacDowall; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  A review of the diagnosis and treatment of atlantoaxial dislocations.

Authors:  Sun Y Yang; Anthony J Boniello; Caroline E Poorman; Andy L Chang; Shenglin Wang; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-05-22

Review 10.  Risk of the high-riding variant of vertebral arteries at C2 is increased over twofold in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomasz Klepinowski; Jagoda Cembik; Leszek Sagan
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.042

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.