Literature DB >> 23830776

Apparent diffusion coefficient as a non-invasive predictor of treatment response and recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer.

A Elmi1, S S Hedgire, D Covarrubias, S M Abtahi, P F Hahn, M Harisinghani.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the role of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a predictor of treatment response and local recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients who underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery were enrolled in the study. The mean tumour ADC was measured independently from multiple, non-overlapping regions of interest (ROIs) to cover the entire tumour area on a single section by two radiologists and patients were followed postoperatively for a median of 16.4 months. Diagnostic accuracy of ADC for predicting treatment response and recurrence was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Univariate and multivariate analyses including clinical tumour (cT) staging, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, lymph-node involvement, tumour grade, surgical margin, vascular involvement, and ADC were performed with respect to recurrence. Interobserver agreement of ADC values was assessed.
RESULTS: Twenty patients showed response to neoadjuvant therapy and recurrence was noted in 17 patients. Low pretreatment ADC, MRI findings of cT4 staging, and node involvement were significantly related to poor treatment response. Sensitivity and specificity of ADC = 0.833 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for prediction of treatment response was 75 and 48% for reader 1 and 65 and 52% for reader 2, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified pretreatment tumour ADC as the only predictive factor for recurrence. Sensitivity and specificity of ADC = 0.833 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for prediction of recurrence was 86 and 77% for reader 1 and 80 and 69% for reader 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement for measuring ADC was good with a kappa value of 0.70.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment rectal tumour ADC values may be an early biomarker for predicting treatment response and local recurrence in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Copyright © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23830776     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  17 in total

Review 1.  Functional MRI and CT biomarkers in oncology.

Authors:  J M Winfield; G S Payne; N M deSouza
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Niels W Schurink; Doenja M J Lambregts; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanfen Cui; Xiaotang Yang; Zhongqiang Shi; Zhao Yang; Xiaosong Du; Zhikai Zhao; Xintao Cheng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Integrated PET/MRI for whole-body staging of patients with primary cervical cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Johannes Grueneisen; Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Martin Heubner; Bahriye Aktas; Sonja Kinner; Michael Forsting; Thomas Lauenstein; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  [Ablative therapy of small renal masses].

Authors:  M C Kriegmair; N Wagener; S J Diehl; N Rathmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Multiparametric MRI in the assessment of response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A comparison of morphological, volumetric and functional MRI parameters.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Lisa Tarlinton; Yousef Mazaheri; Kaitlin M Woo; Mithat Gönen; Leonard B Saltz; Karyn A Goodman; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Pre-treatment circulating leptin/ghrelin ratio as a non-invasive marker to identify patients likely to regain the lost weight after an energy restriction treatment.

Authors:  A B Crujeiras; A Díaz-Lagares; I Abete; E Goyenechea; M Amil; J A Martínez; F F Casanueva
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  The predictive role of ADC values in prostate cancer patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy: initial clinical experience at Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC).

Authors:  Wei-Xiang Qi; Qing Zhang; Ping Li; Xiao-Meng Zhang; Guang-Yuan Zhang; Bin Wu; Jiade J Lu; Guo-Liang Jiang; Shen Fu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Cannot Predict Histopathological Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Maciej Pech; Maciej Powerski; Katja Woidacki; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.404

10.  The Value of MR-DWI and T1 Mapping in Indicating Radiation-Induced Soft Tissue Injury.

Authors:  Zeng Wang; Bowen Xiong; Nannan Kang; Xiaoxian Pan; Caihong Wang; Li Su; Zhen Xing; Jinsheng Hong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.