Literature DB >> 23828852

Carbon dioxide, but not isoflurane, elicits ultrasonic vocalizations in female rats.

J Chisholm1, D De Rantere, N J Fernandez, A Krajacic, D S J Pang.   

Abstract

Gradual filling of a chamber with carbon dioxide is currently listed by the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines as a conditionally acceptable method of euthanasia for rats. Behavioural evidence suggests, however, that exposure to carbon dioxide gas is aversive. Isoflurane is less aversive than carbon dioxide and may be a viable alternative, though objective data are lacking for the period leading up to loss of consciousness. It has been shown that during negative states, such as pain and distress, rats produce ultrasonic vocalizations. The objective of this study was to detect ultrasonic vocalizations during exposure to carbon dioxide gas or isoflurane as an indicator of a negative state. Specialized recording equipment, with a frequency detection range of 10 to 200 kHz, was used to register these calls during administration of each agent. Nine female Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to either carbon dioxide or isoflurane on two different occasions. All rats vocalized in the ultrasonic range (30 to 70 kHz) during exposure to carbon dioxide. When exposed to isoflurane, no calls were detected from any of the animals. The frequent occurrence of ultrasonic vocalizations during carbon dioxide exposure suggests that the common practice of carbon dioxide euthanasia is aversive to rats and that isoflurane may be a preferable alternative.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide; euthanasia; isoflurane; refinement; ultrasonic vocalization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23828852     DOI: 10.1177/0023677213493410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  10 in total

1.  Female- and Intruder-induced Ultrasonic Vocalizations in C57BL/6J Mice as Proxy Indicators for Animal Wellbeing.

Authors:  Brian J Smith; Kate E P Bruner; Lon V Kendall
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 2.  Review of Rodent Euthanasia Methods.

Authors:  Nirah H Shomer; Krystal H Allen-Worthington; Debra L Hickman; Mahesh Jonnalagadda; Joseph T Newsome; Andrea R Slate; Helen Valentine; Angelina M Williams; Michele Wilkinson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Female Urine-induced Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Male C57BL/6J Mice as a Proxy Indicator for Postoperative Pain.

Authors:  Brian J Smith; Kate E P Bruner; Ann M Hess; Lon V Kendall
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 4.  Review of Intraperitoneal Injection of Sodium Pentobarbital as a Method of Euthanasia in Laboratory Rodents.

Authors:  Colin A Laferriere; Daniel Sj Pang
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Interstrain Differences in CO2-Induced Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Mice.

Authors:  Suhrim Fisher; Winona L Burgess; Kenneth D Hines; Gary L Mason; James R Owiny
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Refinement of intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital for euthanasia in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Katie K Zatroch; Cameron G Knight; Julie N Reimer; Daniel S J Pang
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 7.  Understanding rat emotional responses to CO2.

Authors:  Lucía Améndola; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Humanely Ending the Life of Animals: Research Priorities to Identify Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Aline R Steiner; Shannon Axiak Flammer; Ngaio J Beausoleil; Charlotte Berg; Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger; Rebeca García Pinillos; Huw D W Golledge; Michael Marahrens; Robert Meyer; Tobias Schnitzer; Michael J Toscano; Patricia V Turner; Daniel M Weary; Thomas C Gent
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Individual differences in rat sensitivity to CO2.

Authors:  Lucía Améndola; Anna Ratuski; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Variation in the onset of CO2-induced anxiety in female Sprague Dawley rats.

Authors:  Lucía Améndola; Anna Ratuski; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.