BACKGROUND: The effects of many drugs on the unborn child are unknown. In a case-population design, drug exposure of cases is compared with that of a source population; this kind of study can be useful for generating signals. OBJECTIVE: To see whether a comparison of drug use rates from the birth defect registry EUROCAT NNL (cases) with prescription rates from a population-based prescription database, the IADB (population), could be used to detect signals of teratogenic risk of drugs. METHODS: We defined 3,212 cases from the EUROCAT NNL database, a population-based birth defect registry in the Northern Netherlands and 29,223 population controls from the IADB, a prescription database with data from community pharmacies in the same geographical area, born between 1998 and 2008. We classified the malformations of the 3,212 cases into several malformation groups according to organ system (based on the International Classification of Diseases codes and the EUROCAT guidelines). If a child had multiple malformations in several organ systems (n = 253, 7.9 %), he/she was counted in all the categories represented. For several groups of malformations we calculated rate ratios (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals for drugs acting on the central nervous system and for drugs considered to be safe for use in pregnancy. The RRs were based on first-trimester drug use rates from the cases in the EUROCAT NNL database and prescription rates from the population controls in the IADB. RESULTS: For drugs acting on the central nervous system we found significantly increased RRs for the anti-epileptic drug valproic acid and for some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. For drugs considered to be safe only the anti-hypertensive methyldopa showed significantly increased RRs. CONCLUSION: We show that a case-population study is a suitable method for detecting signals of possible teratogenicity, provided that the teratogenic effects and the drugs under study are as specific as possible and the drugs are widely used.
BACKGROUND: The effects of many drugs on the unborn child are unknown. In a case-population design, drug exposure of cases is compared with that of a source population; this kind of study can be useful for generating signals. OBJECTIVE: To see whether a comparison of drug use rates from the birth defect registry EUROCAT NNL (cases) with prescription rates from a population-based prescription database, the IADB (population), could be used to detect signals of teratogenic risk of drugs. METHODS: We defined 3,212 cases from the EUROCAT NNL database, a population-based birth defect registry in the Northern Netherlands and 29,223 population controls from the IADB, a prescription database with data from community pharmacies in the same geographical area, born between 1998 and 2008. We classified the malformations of the 3,212 cases into several malformation groups according to organ system (based on the International Classification of Diseases codes and the EUROCAT guidelines). If a child had multiple malformations in several organ systems (n = 253, 7.9 %), he/she was counted in all the categories represented. For several groups of malformations we calculated rate ratios (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals for drugs acting on the central nervous system and for drugs considered to be safe for use in pregnancy. The RRs were based on first-trimester drug use rates from the cases in the EUROCAT NNL database and prescription rates from the population controls in the IADB. RESULTS: For drugs acting on the central nervous system we found significantly increased RRs for the anti-epileptic drug valproic acid and for some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. For drugs considered to be safe only the anti-hypertensivemethyldopa showed significantly increased RRs. CONCLUSION: We show that a case-population study is a suitable method for detecting signals of possible teratogenicity, provided that the teratogenic effects and the drugs under study are as specific as possible and the drugs are widely used.
Authors: C Olesen; F H Steffensen; G L Nielsen; L de Jong-van den Berg; J Olsen; H T Sørensen Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Carol Louik; Angela E Lin; Martha M Werler; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Allen A Mitchell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-06-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marian K Bakker; Hermien E K De Walle; Bob Wilffert; Lolkje T W de Jong-Van den Berg Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Janneke Jentink; Maria A Loane; Helen Dolk; Ingeborg Barisic; Ester Garne; Joan K Morris; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Janneke Jentink; Helen Dolk; Maria A Loane; Joan K Morris; Diana Wellesley; Ester Garne; Lolkje de Jong-van den Berg Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-12-02
Authors: Paige L Williams; Marilyn J Crain; Cenk Yildirim; Rohan Hazra; Russell B Van Dyke; Kenneth Rich; Jennifer S Read; Emma Stuard; Mobeen Rathore; Hermann A Mendez; D Heather Watts Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Courtney De Vries; Svetla Gadzhanova; Matthew J Sykes; Michael Ward; Elizabeth Roughead Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Linda de Jonge; Hermien E K de Walle; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Irene M van Langen; Marian K Bakker Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Linda de Jonge; Ester Garne; Rosa Gini; Susan E Jordan; Kari Klungsoyr; Maria Loane; Amanda J Neville; Anna Pierini; Aurora Puccini; Daniel S Thayer; David Tucker; Anne Vinkel Hansen; Marian K Bakker Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.606