Literature DB >> 23828421

Is pathologic confirmation of placental abruption more reliable in cases due to chronic etiologies compared with acute etiologies?

Debra S Heller, Megan Keane-Tarchichi, Shalini Varshney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathology laboratories often receive requests for confirmation of abruption; however, pathologically, abruption can only be confirmed by the presence of adherent blood clot on the maternal surface that is indenting the underlying placental parenchyma.
DESIGN: We evaluated whether abruptions due to more chronic underlying medical conditions are more likely to have a retained indenting retroplacental clot that is detectable by the pathologist than abruptions due to acute etiologies. This was a retrospective review from January 1995 to June 2012 of cases with a clinical and/or pathologic diagnosis of abruption. Data were analyzed utilizing Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Ninety-six cases had sufficient available information for analysis. There was a significant association between pathologic identification of abruption and chronic risk factors (P=0.03). Twenty-five percent of cases with acute risk factors and 60% of cases with chronic risk factors had abruption confirmed at pathologic evaluation (P=0.12).
CONCLUSION: Pathologically confirmable abruption is associated with chronic risk factors. There was a trend towards chronic risk factors leading to greater likelihood of pathologic confirmation of abruption than acute risk factors, but it did not reach statistical significance.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23828421     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  1 in total

1.  The histologic evolution of revealed, acute abruptions.

Authors:  Athena L Chen; Ilona T Goldfarb; Aristana O Scourtas; Drucilla J Roberts
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.466

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.