Sabine Ruf1, Dana Klimas, Mario Hönemann, Sarah Jabir. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Medical Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Germany. sabine.ruf@dentist.med.uni-giessen.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to identify all known gene mutations that have been associated with the development of nonsyndromic oligodontia. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed electronically in two databases (PubMed, Medpilot) supplemented by a hand search. Articles published up to March 2012 were considered. Search terms were combined as follows: oligodontia and genes, oligodontia and mutations, tooth agenesis and genes, and tooth agenesis and mutations. A meta-analysis of the data was conducted based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC). RESULTS: Seven genes are currently known to have a potential for causing nonsyndromic oligodontia. All these genes vary both in terms of number of identified mutations and in terms of number of documented patients: 33 mutations and 93 patients are on record for PAX9, 10 mutations and 51 patients for EDA, 12 mutations and 33 patients for MSX1, 6 mutations and 17 patients for AXIN2, and 1 mutation in 1 patient for EDARADD, NEMO, and KRT17 each. A total TAC score of 250 was found to have cutoff properties, as 100% of MSX1 and 80% of EDA patients exhibited TAC ≤ 250, whereas 96.9% of PAX9 and 90% of AXIN2 patients exhibited TAC >250. Furthermore, 94.3% of EDA patients but only 28.6% of MSX1 patients exhibited odd-numbered TAC scores in at least one quadrant, and 72.7% of PAX9 but none of the AXIN2 patients were found to show TAC scores of 112 in at least one quadrant. CONCLUSION: In order of decreasing frequency, PAX9, EDA, MSX1, AXIN2, EDARADD, NEMO, and KRT17 are the seven genes currently known to have a potential for causing nonsyndromic oligodontia. TAC scores enabled us to identify an association between oligodontia phenotypes and genotypes in the patients covered by this meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to identify all known gene mutations that have been associated with the development of nonsyndromic oligodontia. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed electronically in two databases (PubMed, Medpilot) supplemented by a hand search. Articles published up to March 2012 were considered. Search terms were combined as follows: oligodontia and genes, oligodontia and mutations, tooth agenesis and genes, and tooth agenesis and mutations. A meta-analysis of the data was conducted based on the Tooth Agenesis Code (TAC). RESULTS: Seven genes are currently known to have a potential for causing nonsyndromic oligodontia. All these genes vary both in terms of number of identified mutations and in terms of number of documented patients: 33 mutations and 93 patients are on record for PAX9, 10 mutations and 51 patients for EDA, 12 mutations and 33 patients for MSX1, 6 mutations and 17 patients for AXIN2, and 1 mutation in 1 patient for EDARADD, NEMO, and KRT17 each. A total TAC score of 250 was found to have cutoff properties, as 100% of MSX1 and 80% of EDApatients exhibited TAC ≤ 250, whereas 96.9% of PAX9 and 90% of AXIN2patients exhibited TAC >250. Furthermore, 94.3% of EDApatients but only 28.6% of MSX1patients exhibited odd-numbered TAC scores in at least one quadrant, and 72.7% of PAX9 but none of the AXIN2patients were found to show TAC scores of 112 in at least one quadrant. CONCLUSION: In order of decreasing frequency, PAX9, EDA, MSX1, AXIN2, EDARADD, NEMO, and KRT17 are the seven genes currently known to have a potential for causing nonsyndromic oligodontia. TAC scores enabled us to identify an association between oligodontia phenotypes and genotypes in the patients covered by this meta-analysis.
Authors: G A Mendoza-Fandino; J M Gee; S Ben-Dor; C Gonzalez-Quevedo; K Lee; Y Kobayashi; J Hartiala; R M Myers; S M Leal; H Allayee; P I Patel Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: S-W Wong; D Han; H Zhang; Y Liu; X Zhang; M Z Miao; Y Wang; N Zhao; L Zeng; B Bai; Y-X Wang; H Liu; S A Frazier-Bowers; H Feng Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Christian Guilleminault; Vivien C Abad; Hsiao-Yean Chiu; Brandon Peters; Stacey Quo Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 2.816