Debra Rickwood1, Nina Van Dyke, Nic Telford. 1. Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: headspace centres comprise a significant innovation in community-based youth mental health service delivery in Australia. This paper examines the service activity of the first headspace centres to determine common and unique practice characteristics across headspace centres in this new approach to mental health service delivery. METHODS: Data come from quarterly progress reports provided by the first 30 headspace centres during the 2010-2011 financial year. The information from 120 reports was analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis techniques to determine the types of activities reported by centres against key performance indicators. RESULTS: The main finding was the large number and wide range of centre activity. This heterogeneity may be explained in part by the diversity of communities across Australia and the importance that headspace places on addressing the specific needs of the local community as well as drawing upon the existing capacity that is available within a community. The most common activities were community engagement, building local partnerships and providing a youth friendly environment. There was a particularly strong focus by the majority of centres on establishing and supporting a Youth Reference Group to guide centre development and implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The progressive upscaling of headspace centres across Australia provides a unique opportunity to observe how a significant reorientation in health service delivery is implemented in practice to meet the needs of diverse communities. Further investigation of the headspace experience will provide critical lessons for other countries investing in new approaches to youth mental health.
AIM: headspace centres comprise a significant innovation in community-based youth mental health service delivery in Australia. This paper examines the service activity of the first headspace centres to determine common and unique practice characteristics across headspace centres in this new approach to mental health service delivery. METHODS: Data come from quarterly progress reports provided by the first 30 headspace centres during the 2010-2011 financial year. The information from 120 reports was analysed qualitatively using thematic analysis techniques to determine the types of activities reported by centres against key performance indicators. RESULTS: The main finding was the large number and wide range of centre activity. This heterogeneity may be explained in part by the diversity of communities across Australia and the importance that headspace places on addressing the specific needs of the local community as well as drawing upon the existing capacity that is available within a community. The most common activities were community engagement, building local partnerships and providing a youth friendly environment. There was a particularly strong focus by the majority of centres on establishing and supporting a Youth Reference Group to guide centre development and implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The progressive upscaling of headspace centres across Australia provides a unique opportunity to observe how a significant reorientation in health service delivery is implemented in practice to meet the needs of diverse communities. Further investigation of the headspace experience will provide critical lessons for other countries investing in new approaches to youth mental health.
Authors: Bridianne O'Dea; Rico S C Lee; Patrick D McGorry; Ian B Hickie; Jan Scott; Daniel F Hermens; Arnstein Mykletun; Rosemary Purcell; Eoin Killackey; Christos Pantelis; G Paul Amminger; Nicholas Glozier Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Paris Alexandros Lalousis; Stephen J Wood; Lianne Schmaal; Katharine Chisholm; Sian Lowri Griffiths; Renate L E P Reniers; Alessandro Bertolino; Stefan Borgwardt; Paolo Brambilla; Joseph Kambeitz; Rebekka Lencer; Christos Pantelis; Stephan Ruhrmann; Raimo K R Salokangas; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Carolina Bonivento; Dominic Dwyer; Adele Ferro; Theresa Haidl; Marlene Rosen; Andre Schmidt; Eva Meisenzahl; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Rachel Upthegrove Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Laura Ospina-Pinillos; Tracey A Davenport; Cristina S Ricci; Alyssa C Milton; Elizabeth M Scott; Ian B Hickie Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Cara A Settipani; Lisa D Hawke; Kristin Cleverley; Gloria Chaim; Amy Cheung; Kamna Mehra; Maureen Rice; Peter Szatmari; Joanna Henderson Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2019-07-23
Authors: Sanne Oostermeijer; Michelle Williamson; Angela Nicholas; Anna Machlin; Bridget Bassilios Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Karin Halje; Toomas Timpka; Petra Tylestedt; Anna-Karin Adler; Lena Fröberg; Tommy Schyman; Kristoffer Johansson; Katarina Dahl Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 2.692