Literature DB >> 23826841

Clinical performance of serum prostate-specific antigen isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA) and its derivatives, %p2PSA and the prostate health index (PHI), in men with a family history of prostate cancer: results from a multicentre European study, the PROMEtheuS project.

Massimo Lazzeri1, Alexander Haese, Alberto Abrate, Alexandre de la Taille, Joan Palou Redorta, Thomas McNicholas, Giovanni Lughezzani, Giuliana Lista, Alessandro Larcher, Vittorio Bini, Andrea Cestari, Nicolòmaria Buffi, Markus Graefen, Olivier Bosset, Philippe Le Corvoisier, Alberto Breda, Pablo de la Torre, Linda Fowler, Jacques Roux, Giorgio Guazzoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of serum prostate-specific antigen isoform [-2]proPSA (p2PSA), %p2PSA and the prostate health index (PHI), in men with a family history of prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing prostate biopsy for suspected PCa. To evaluate the potential reduction in unnecessary biopsies and the characteristics of potentially missed cases of PCa that would result from using serum p2PSA, %p2PSA and PHI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis consisted of a nested case-control study from the PRO-PSA Multicentric European Study, the PROMEtheuS project. All patients had a first-degree relative (father, brother, son) with PCa. Multivariable logistic regression models were complemented by predictive accuracy analysis and decision-curve analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 1026 patients included in the PROMEtheuS cohort, 158 (15.4%) had a first-degree relative with PCa. p2PSA, %p2PSA and PHI values were significantly higher (P < 0.001), and free/total PSA (%fPSA) values significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the 71 patients with PCa (44.9%) than in patients without PCa. Univariable accuracy analysis showed %p2PSA (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.733) and PHI (AUC: 0.733) to be the most accurate predictors of PCa at biopsy, significantly outperforming total PSA ([tPSA] AUC: 0.549), free PSA ([fPSA] AUC: 0.489) and %fPSA (AUC: 0.600) (P ≤ 0.001). For %p2PSA a threshold of 1.66 was found to have the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (70.4 and 70.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.4-80.7 and 59.4-79.5 respectively). A PHI threshold of 40 was found to have the best balance between sensitivity and specificity (64.8 and 71.3%, respectively; 95% CI 52.5-75.8 and 60.6-80.5). At 90% sensitivity, the thresholds for %p2PSA and PHI were 1.20 and 25.5, with a specificity of 37.9 and 25.5%, respectively. At a %p2PSA threshold of 1.20, a total of 39 (24.8%) biopsies could have been avoided, but two cancers with a Gleason score (GS) of 7 would have been missed. At a PHI threshold of 25.5 a total of 27 (17.2%) biopsies could have been avoided and two (3.8%) cancers with a GS of 7 would have been missed. In multivariable logistic regression models, %p2PSA and PHI achieved independent predictor status and significantly increased the accuracy of multivariable models including PSA and prostate volume by 8.7 and 10%, respectively (P ≤ 0.001). p2PSA, %p2PSA and PHI were directly correlated with Gleason score (ρ: 0.247, P = 0.038; ρ: 0.366, P = 0.002; ρ: 0.464, P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: %p2PSA and PHI are more accurate than tPSA, fPSA and %fPSA in predicting PCa in men with a family history of PCa. Consideration of %p2PSA and PHI results in the avoidance of several unnecessary biopsies. p2PSA, %p2PSA and PHI correlate with cancer aggressiveness.
© 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  familial prostate cancer; p2PSA; positive biopsy; predictive models; prostate health index; prostate-specific antigen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23826841     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  38 in total

Review 1.  The Prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; William J Catalona
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2014-04

2.  Prostate cancer: Prostate Health Index--improving screening in men with family history.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Screening and Detection of Prostate Cancer-Review of Literature and Current Perspective.

Authors:  Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-23

Review 4.  Clinical and Novel Biomarkers in the Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Cristóbal Sanhueza; Manish Kohli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 5.  The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men.

Authors:  Hasan Dani; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  Next-generation prostate-specific antigen test: precursor form of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Yuji Fujizuka; Kiyohide Ishikura; Bernard Cook
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  [Diagnostic markers in urology].

Authors:  Marie C Hupe; Marie C Hempel; Severin Rodler; Maria Frantzi; Harald Mischak; Axel S Merseburger; Christian G Stief; Michael Chaloupka
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Significance of preoperative butyrylcholinesterase as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Shingo Hatakeyama; Atsushi Imai; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Tohru Yoneyama; Yuki Tobisawa; Shogo Hosogoe; Hayato Yamamoto; Masato Kitayama; Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 10.  Clinical Utility of Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Leapman; Hao G Nguyen; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.