Literature DB >> 23826705

Test-retest studies in quantitative sensory testing: a critical review.

M U Werner1, M A Petersen, J M Bischoff.   

Abstract

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) investigates the graded psychophysical response to controlled thermal, mechanical, electrical or chemical stimuli, allowing quantification of clinically relevant perception and pain thresholds. The methods are ubiquitously used in experimental and clinical pain research, and therefore, the need for uniform assessment procedures has been emphasised. However, varying consistency and transparency in the statistical methodology seem to occur in the QST literature. Sixteen publications, evaluating aspects of QST variability, from 2010 to 2012, were critically reviewed in detail. A considerable heterogeneity in the statistical evaluations of test-retest data was demonstrated. The authors, using a secondary analysis of published data for didactic purposes, propose and present minimal requirements for reporting of test-retest QST data.
© 2013 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23826705     DOI: 10.1111/aas.12150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  9 in total

1.  Demarcation of secondary hyperalgesia zones: Punctate stimulation pressure matters.

Authors:  Thomas K Ringsted; Casper Enghuus; Morten A Petersen; Mads U Werner
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.

Authors:  Estephan J Moana-Filho; Aurelio A Alonso; Flavia P Kapos; Vladimir Leon-Salazar; Scott H Durand; James S Hodges; Donald R Nixdorf
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2017-05-01

3.  Development of a Novel Brief Quantitative Sensory Testing Protocol That Integrates Static and Dynamic Pain Assessments: Test-Retest Performance in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Martin J De Vita; Katherine Buckheit; Christina E Gilmour; Dezarie Moskal; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.637

Review 4.  Endogenous opioid antagonism in physiological experimental pain models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mads U Werner; Manuel P Pereira; Lars Peter H Andersen; Jørgen B Dahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Eliane Marçon Barroso; Estela Cristina Carneseca; Cristiano de Pádua Souza; Felipe Thomé Dos Santos; Rossana Verónica Mendoza López; Sakamoto Bianca Ribeiro Paiva
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Effect of painless diabetic neuropathy on pressure pain hypersensitivity (hyperalgesia) after acute foot trauma.

Authors:  Tobias Wienemann; Ernst A Chantelau; Armin Koller
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2014-11-06

7.  The Area of Secondary Hyperalgesia following Heat Stimulation in Healthy Male Volunteers: Inter- and Intra-Individual Variance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Morten Sejer Hansen; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Bressen Pipper; Rebecca Østervig; Mohammad Sohail Asghar; Jørgen Berg Dahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Helen Nothnagel; Christian Puta; Thomas Lehmann; Philipp Baumbach; Martha B Menard; Brunhild Gabriel; Holger H W Gabriel; Thomas Weiss; Frauke Musial
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing.

Authors:  Julia Gehling; Tina Mainka; Jan Vollert; Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn; Christoph Maier; Elena K Enax-Krumova
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.474

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.