| Literature DB >> 23826234 |
Qian Niu1, Ruke Zhang, Min Zhao, Sugen Zeng, Xunbei Huang, Hong Jiang, Youfang An, Luwen Zhang.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The present data on the evaluation of platelet (PLT) parameters in Chinese Han population and Tibetans are still limited. The objective of this study was to determine the differences in common PLT indices between Han population and Tibetans in China, through a large-scale investigation of healthy people.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23826234 PMCID: PMC3691229 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographics of three group subjects.
| Group |
| Male/female | Age (years) |
|
| Han people in plain | 2131 | 856/1275 | 40.1±12.4 | >0.05 |
| Tibetans in Plateau | 1099 | 508/591 | 45.3±13.1 | >0.05 |
| Plateau Han migrants | 956 | 430/526 | 46.4±13.9 | >0.05 |
Values are expressed as mean±SD or number.
Figure 1Analysis of PLT indices in three groups.
A: Analysis of the mean PLT count; B: Analysis of MPV; C: Analysis of PDW; D: Analysis of P-LCR.
Analysis of PLT indices in three groups.
| Group | PLT (×109/L) | MPV (fl) | PDW (%) | P-LCR (%) |
| Han people in plain | 185.59±52.20 | 12.42±1.20 | 16.72±3.17 | 44.44±9.36 |
| Tibetans in Plateau | 195.42±57.63 | 11.76±1.11 (9.6∼21.3) | 15.30±2.79 (9.8∼25.1) | 38.42±8.01 |
| Plateau Han migrants | 169.32±54.52 (62∼232) | 12.12±1.08 (10.0∼22.1) | 16.53±3.02 | 40.69±7.57 (25.9∼66.5) |
Data are expressed as mean±SD with 95% CI.
P<0.01 vs Tibetans in Plateau;
P<0.05 vs Plateau Han migrants.
Figure 2Spearman's correlation analysis.
A: The PLT count was negatively correlated with MPV (r = −0.523, P<0.001); B: The PLT count was negatively correlated with PDW (r = −0.539, P<0.001); C: The PLT count was negatively correlated with P-LCR (r = −0.501, P<0.001); D: MPV was positively correlated with PDW (r = 0.946, P<0.001); E: MPV was positively correlated with P-LCR (r = 0.990, P<0.001); F: PDW was positively correlated with P-LCR (r = 0.929, P<0.001).