Literature DB >> 23825898

Deformable M-Reps for 3D Medical Image Segmentation.

Stephen M Pizer1, P Thomas Fletcher, Sarang Joshi, Andrew Thall, James Z Chen, Yonatan Fridman, Daniel S Fritsch, Graham Gash, John M Glotzer, Michael R Jiroutek, Conglin Lu, Keith E Muller, Gregg Tracton, Paul Yushkevich, Edward L Chaney.   

Abstract

M-reps (formerly called DSLs) are a multiscale medial means for modeling and rendering 3D solid geometry. They are particularly well suited to model anatomic objects and in particular to capture prior geometric information effectively in deformable models segmentation approaches. The representation is based on figural models, which define objects at coarse scale by a hierarchy of figures - each figure generally a slab representing a solid region and its boundary simultaneously. This paper focuses on the use of single figure models to segment objects of relatively simple structure. A single figure is a sheet of medial atoms, which is interpolated from the model formed by a net, i.e., a mesh or chain, of medial atoms (hence the name m-reps), each atom modeling a solid region via not only a position and a width but also a local figural frame giving figural directions and an object angle between opposing, corresponding positions on the boundary implied by the m-rep. The special capability of an m-rep is to provide spatial and orientational correspondence between an object in two different states of deformation. This ability is central to effective measurement of both geometric typicality and geometry to image match, the two terms of the objective function optimized in segmentation by deformable models. The other ability of m-reps central to effective segmentation is their ability to support segmentation at multiple levels of scale, with successively finer precision. Objects modeled by single figures are segmented first by a similarity transform augmented by object elongation, then by adjustment of each medial atom, and finally by displacing a dense sampling of the m-rep implied boundary. While these models and approaches also exist in 2D, we focus on 3D objects. The segmentation of the kidney from CT and the hippocampus from MRI serve as the major examples in this paper. The accuracy of segmentation as compared to manual, slice-by-slice segmentation is reported.

Year:  2003        PMID: 23825898      PMCID: PMC3697155          DOI: 10.1023/a:1026313132218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Vis        ISSN: 0920-5691            Impact factor:   7.410


  7 in total

1.  Elastic model-based segmentation of 3-D neuroradiological data sets.

Authors:  A Kelemen; G Székely; G Gerig
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape.

Authors:  S M Pizer; D S Fritsch; P A Yushkevich; V E Johnson; E L Chaney
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Model-based deformable surface finding for medical images.

Authors:  L H Staib; J S Duncan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Statistical shape analysis of neuroanatomical structures based on medial models.

Authors:  M Styner; G Gerig; J Lieberman; D Jones; D Weinberger
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 5.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey.

Authors:  T McInerney; D Terzopoulos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.

Authors:  D Marr; H K Nishihara
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1978-02-23

7.  Linking object boundaries at scale: a common mechanism for size and shape judgments.

Authors:  C A Burbeck; S M Pizer; B S Morse; D Ariely; G S Zauberman; J P Rolland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

  7 in total
  40 in total

1.  Development of a semi-automated method for mitral valve modeling with medial axis representation using 3D ultrasound.

Authors:  Alison M Pouch; Paul A Yushkevich; Benjamin M Jackson; Arminder S Jassar; Mathieu Vergnat; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Medial axis shape coding in macaque inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Hung; Eric T Carlson; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Deformable modeling using a 3D boundary representation with quadratic constraints on the branching structure of the Blum skeleton.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Hui Gary Zhang
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2013

4.  Hippocampus-specific fMRI group activation analysis using the continuous medial representation.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; John A Detre; Dawn Mechanic-Hamilton; María A Fernández-Seara; Kathy Z Tang; Angela Hoang; Marc Korczykowski; Hui Zhang; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Image estimation from marker locations for dose calculation in prostate radiation therapy.

Authors:  Huai-Ping Lee; Mark Foskey; Josh Levy; Rohit Saboo; Ed Chaney
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2010

6.  3D bicipital groove shape analysis and relationship to tendopathy.

Authors:  Aaron D Ward; Ghassan Hamarneh; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Continuous medial representation of brain structures using the biharmonic PDE.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Deformable templates guided discriminative models for robust 3D brain MRI segmentation.

Authors:  Cheng-Yi Liu; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Zhuowen Tu
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-10

9.  Imaging-based observational databases for clinical problem solving: the role of informatics.

Authors:  Alex A T Bui; William Hsu; Corey Arnold; Suzie El-Saden; Denise R Aberle; Ricky K Taira
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Cortical shell unwrapping for vertebral body abnormality detection on computed tomography.

Authors:  Jianhua Yao; Joseph E Burns; Hector Muñoz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.