Literature DB >> 23825865

Current perspectives on chlorpromazine equivalents: Comparing apples and oranges!

Vijay Danivas1, Ganesan Venkatasubramanian.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23825865      PMCID: PMC3696254          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.111475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0019-5545            Impact factor:   1.759


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Chlorpromazine equivalence (CPZE) has been taught to psychiatrists over generations. The concept of anti-psychotic equivalence, CPZE in particular, has been used for long time to compare the dose and efficacy of the anti-psychotics. The application of this was much prevalent during the era of typical anti-psychotics, which slowly started fading away with widespread use of atypical anti-psychotics.[1] The reason being that the receptor profile of these group being different - typical only predominantly on D2 receptors (mostly) and atypical on serotonergic, histaminergic, cholinergic and adrenergic receptors over the dopaminergic receptors.[2] Nonetheless, the needs for a measure to compare the anti-psychotics on a common platform have been long felt and attempts have been made for the same. One such attempt is the concept of defined daily dose (DDD). In this critique, we comment about the concepts of CPZE and the DDD and present the chlorpromazine equivalents of the available anti-psychotic medications. The standardized method to compare different anti-psychotics helps in determining the efficacy of the drug and in determining the target dose while changing from one medicine to another. Further, it helps in monitoring the side effect profile and assessing the costs of treatment. The chlorpromazine equivalent is one such measure, which has been used from the earlier days. Later the concept of DDD was introduced. CPZE is defined as the dose of a drug, which is equivalent to 100 mg of oral dose of chlorpromazine. The drug equivalent to 200-300 mg of chlorpromazine is considered the minimum effective dose[3] and more than 1000 mg of chlorpromazine is considered high.[4] The literature gives the equivalence of anti-psychotics of first generation with much more clarity than the second generation drugs. The main reason for this being the action of later on serotonergic, histaminergic, cholinergic and adrenergic receptors over the dopaminergic receptors compared to the former.[2] However, even as the debate regarding the relevance of the equivalents for second generation drugs go on, Woods[5] in his review based on the reported minimum effective dose has arrived at the chlorpromazine equivalents of the atypical anti-psychotics. The equivalence of all the anti-psychotics, typicals, and atypicals, has been synthesized into Table 1 based on the data from the available review literature.
Table 1

Chloropromazine equivalents of different anti-psychotics

Chloropromazine equivalents of different anti-psychotics The other critique on this concept is that the equivalence is based on the assumption that the relationship between the dose and the potency is linear, which may not be true for all the anti-psychotics, for example, the relative anti-psychotic potency of haloperidol significantly decreases as the dosage increases.[1] Although, the receptor profile seems to be the concept, the data are derived from clinical and anecdotal resources. This affects the observation as the sedative and anxiolytic effects of drugs would make drugs such as haloperidol seem less potent in comparison with chlorpromazine.[6] The other available platform to compare anti-psychotics is based on their DDD. The DDD is defined as the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used in its main indication in adults. This international unit was approved by World Health Organization (WHO) in 2003 and the values are determined by WHO collaborating center for drug statistics methodology. The advantage of DDD over the CPZE is that the DDD is calculated based on the review of published systematic studies.[7] Studies have looked into the reliability and the agreement between the doses across the drugs. These studies have differing results. The studies by Rijcken et al.[8] and Barr et al.[9] reported significant difference for comparability between the DDD and the CPZE. The later reported that, CPZE is a reliable platform to compare the anti-psychotics owing to their affinity for dopamine receptor occupancy. However, a study by Nose et al.[7] had a result favoring the coherence between the two systems and noted that DDD is a reliable tool for comparison, as it is beyond the influence of price of the drug and maximum recommended values as per the individual national formularies. Chlorpromazine equivalent and DDD are two widely used platforms to compare the doses of anti-psychotics. While CPZEs are easy to remember and use in day-to-day clinical practice, given the wide ranging differences in the pharmacodynamic profile of various anti-psychotics (ranging from apples to oranges), this yard stick seems to be limited in terms of its clinical utility. DDD seems to be a better option in the research settings, as it allows comparison across population. Further studies are warranted to standardize the methods to compare the anti-psychotics in terms of their efficacy and potency, based on their actions at the receptor levels.
  4 in total

1.  A comparison of antipsychotic drug-defined daily doses versus chlorpromazine equivalent doses in patients with or without extrapyramidal motor symptoms.

Authors:  Alasdair M Barr; William G Honer; Joy L Johnson; Tony K Y Wu; Ric M Procyshyn
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.153

2.  Is the Defined Daily Dose system a reliable tool for standardizing antipsychotic dosages?

Authors:  Michela Nosè; Michele Tansella; Graham Thornicroft; Aart Schene; Thomas Becker; Antonio Veronese; Morven Leese; Maarten Koeter; Matthias Angermeyer; Corrado Barbui
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.659

Review 3.  Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  Scott W Woods
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Chlorpromazine equivalents versus defined daily doses: how to compare antipsychotic drug doses?

Authors:  Claudia A W Rijcken; Taco B M Monster; Jacobus R B J Brouwers; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.153

  4 in total
  26 in total

1.  Long non-coding and endogenous retroviral RNA levels are associated with proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression in peripheral blood cells: Implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jennifer K Melbourne; Kayla A Chase; Benjamin Feiner; Cherise Rosen; Rajiv P Sharma
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  C4A mRNA expression in PBMCs predicts the presence and severity of delusions in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis.

Authors:  Jennifer K Melbourne; Cherise Rosen; Benjamin Feiner; Rajiv P Sharma
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Intraoperative low tidal volume ventilation and the risk of ICD-10 coded delirium and the use for antipsychotic medications.

Authors:  Dharshi Karalapillai; Laurence Weinberg; Ary Serpa Neto; Philip J Peyton; Louise Ellard; Raymond Hu; Brett Pearce; Chong Tan; David Story; Mark O'Donnell; Patrick Hamilton; Chad Oughton; Jonathan Galtieri; Sree Appu; Anthony Wilson; Glenn Eastwood; Rinaldo Bellomo; Daryl A Jones
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.376

4.  Incidence and risk factors of acute akathisia in 493 individuals with first episode non-affective psychosis: a 6-week randomised study of antipsychotic treatment.

Authors:  Maria Juncal-Ruiz; Mariluz Ramirez-Bonilla; Jorge Gomez-Arnau; Victor Ortiz-Garcia de la Foz; Paula Suarez-Pinilla; Obdulia Martinez-Garcia; Karl David Neergaard; Rafael Tabares-Seisdedos; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Activated Phosphorylated STAT1 Levels as a Biologically Relevant Immune Signal in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Rajiv P Sharma; Cherise Rosen; Jennifer K Melbourne; Benjamin Feiner; Kayla A Chase
Journal:  Neuroimmunomodulation       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.492

6.  Negative voice-content as a full mediator of a relation between childhood adversity and distress ensuing from hearing voices.

Authors:  Cherise Rosen; Simon McCarthy-Jones; Nev Jones; Kayla A Chase; Rajiv P Sharma
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Effort-Based Decision-Making in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Adam J Culbreth; Erin K Moran; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-12-22

8.  Higher order theory of mind in patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder.

Authors:  Guillem Navarra-Ventura; Muriel Vicent-Gil; Maria Serra-Blasco; Jesús Cobo; Sol Fernández-Gonzalo; Ximena Goldberg; Mercè Jodar; Josep Maria Crosas; Diego Palao; Guillermo Lahera; Eduard Vieta; Narcís Cardoner
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Monocyte Transcriptional Profiling Highlights a Shift in Immune Signatures Over the Course of Illness in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jennifer K Melbourne; Cherise Rosen; Kayla A Chase; Benjamin Feiner; Rajiv P Sharma
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  A description of antipsychotic prescribing patterns based on race in the inpatient behavioral health setting.

Authors:  Thomas Maestri; David Anderson; Jose Calderon-Abbo; Taylor Waguespack; Margarita Echeverri
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.