Literature DB >> 23825296

Understanding attitudes towards the use of animals in research using an online public engagement tool.

Catherine A Schuppli1, Carla F M Molento2, Daniel M Weary3.   

Abstract

Using an online public engagement experiment, we probed the views of 617 participants on the use of pigs as research animals (to reduce agricultural pollution or to improve organ transplant success in humans) with and without genetic modification and using different numbers of pigs. In both scenarios and across demographics, level of opposition increased when the research required the use of GM corn or GM pigs. Animal numbers had little effect. A total of 1037 comments were analyzed to understand decisions. Participants were most concerned about the impact of the research on animal welfare. Genetic modification was viewed as an intervention in nature and there was worry about unpredictable consequences. Both opponents and supporters sought assurances that concerns were addressed. Governing bodies for animal research should make efforts to document and mitigate consequences of GM and other procedures, and increase efforts to maintain a dialogue with the public around acceptability of these procedures.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal experimentation; animal welfare; genetic modification; mixed methods; public attitudes

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23825296     DOI: 10.1177/0963662513490466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  5 in total

Review 1.  Public Attitudes toward Animal Research: A Review.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Ormandy; Catherine A Schuppli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Attitudes toward animals, and how species and purpose affect animal research justifiability, among undergraduate students and faculty.

Authors:  Eric P Sandgren; Robert Streiffer; Jennifer Dykema; Nadia Assad; Jackson Moberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Influence of animal pain and distress on judgments of animal research justifiability among university undergraduate students and faculty.

Authors:  Eric P Sandgren; Robert Streiffer; Jennifer Dykema; Nadia Assad; Jackson Moberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  The Avatar Acceptability Study: Survivor, Parent and Community Willingness to Use Patient-Derived Xenografts to Personalize Cancer Care.

Authors:  C E Wakefield; E L Doolan; J E Fardell; C Signorelli; V F Quinn; K M Tucker; A F Patenaude; G M Marshall; R B Lock; G Georgiou; R J Cohn
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 8.143

5.  Predicting Public Attitudes Toward Gene Editing of Germlines: The Impact of Moral and Hereditary Concern in Human and Animal Applications.

Authors:  Christine Critchley; Dianne Nicol; Gordana Bruce; Jarrod Walshe; Tamara Treleaven; Bernard Tuch
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.