Literature DB >> 23825262

Predicting scientists' participation in public life.

John C Besley1, Sang Hwa Oh, Matthew Nisbet.   

Abstract

This research provides secondary data analysis of two large-scale scientist surveys. These include a 2009 survey of American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) members and a 2006 survey of university scientists by the United Kingdom's Royal Society. Multivariate models are applied to better understand the motivations, beliefs, and conditions that promote scientists' involvement in communication with the public and the news media. In terms of demographics, scientists who have reached mid-career status are more likely than their peers to engage in outreach, though even after controlling for career stage, chemists are less likely than other scientists to do so. In terms of perceptions and motivations, a deficit model view that a lack of public knowledge is harmful, a personal commitment to the public good, and feelings of personal efficacy and professional obligation are among the strongest predictors of seeing outreach as important and in participating in engagement activities.

Keywords:  media engagement; public engagement; science communication; scientists’ understanding of the public

Year:  2012        PMID: 23825262     DOI: 10.1177/0963662512459315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  12 in total

1.  Gap between science and media revisited: scientists as public communicators.

Authors:  Hans Peter Peters
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An analysis of nanoscientists as public communicators.

Authors:  Anthony Dudo; LeeAnn Kahlor; Niveen AbiGhannam; Allison Lazard; Ming-Ching Liang
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia.

Authors:  Mikhaila N Calice; Becca Beets; Luye Bao; Dietram A Scheufele; Isabelle Freiling; Dominique Brossard; Noah Weeth Feinstein; Laura Heisler; Travis Tangen; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Scientists: Engage the Public!

Authors:  Erika C Shugart; Vincent R Racaniello
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 7.867

5.  Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.

Authors:  Anthony Dudo; John C Besley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement.

Authors:  Emily L Howell; Julia Nepper; Dominique Brossard; Michael A Xenos; Dietram A Scheufele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validating a scale to measure engineers' perceived self-efficacy for engineering education outreach.

Authors:  Laura Fogg-Rogers; Tim Moss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.

Authors:  Carolina Llorente; Gema Revuelta; Mar Carrió; Miquel Porta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Increasing both the public health potential of basic research and the scientist satisfaction. An international survey of bio-scientists.

Authors:  Carmen Sorrentino; Andrea Boggio; Stefano Confalonieri; David Hemenway; Giorgio Scita; Andrea Ballabeni
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-01-12

10.  Microbiologists' Public Engagement Views and Behaviors.

Authors:  Anthony Dudo; John Besley; Lee Ann Kahlor; Hyeseung Koh; Jacob Copple; Shupei Yuan
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2018-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.