Literature DB >> 23825120

Evidence for a specific uptake and retention mechanism for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) in skeletal muscle cells.

M Abboud1, D A Puglisi, B N Davies, M Rybchyn, N P Whitehead, K E Brock, L Cole, C Gordon-Thomson, D R Fraser, R S Mason.   

Abstract

Little is known about the mechanism for the prolonged residence time of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) in blood. Several lines of evidence led us to propose that skeletal muscle could function as the site of an extravascular pool of 25OHD. In vitro studies investigated the capacity of differentiated C2 murine muscle cells to take up and release 25OHD, in comparison with other cell types and the involvement of the membrane protein megalin in these mechanisms. When C2 cells are differentiated into myotubes, the time-dependent uptake of labeled 25OHD is 2-3 times higher than in undifferentiated myoblasts or nonmuscle osteoblastic MG63 cells (P < .001). During in vitro release experiments (after 25OHD uptake), myotubes released only 32% ± 6% stored 25OHD after 4 hours, whereas this figure was 60% ± 2% for osteoblasts (P < .01). Using immunofluorescence, C2 myotubes and primary rat muscle fibers were, for the first time, shown to express megalin and cubilin, endocytotic receptors for the vitamin D binding protein (DBP), which binds nearly all 25OHD in the blood. DBP has a high affinity for actin in skeletal muscle. A time-dependent uptake of Alexafluor-488-labeled DBP into mature muscle cells was observed by confocal microscopy. Incubation of C2 myotubes (for 24 hours) with receptor-associated protein, a megalin inhibitor, led to a 40% decrease in 25OHD uptake (P < .01). These data support the proposal that 25OHD, after uptake into mature muscle cells, is held there by DBP, which has been internalized via membrane megalin and is retained by binding to actin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23825120     DOI: 10.1210/en.2012-2245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinology        ISSN: 0013-7227            Impact factor:   4.736


  41 in total

Review 1.  The clinical use of vitamin D metabolites and their potential developments: a position statement from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Claudio Cricelli; John A Kanis; Ranuccio Nuti; Jean-Y Reginster; Johann D Ringe; Rene Rizzoli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Expression of the vitamin D receptor in skeletal muscle: are we there yet?

Authors:  J Wesley Pike
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Levels in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Associations with Physical Activity.

Authors:  Stephanie Skender; Jürgen Böhm; Petra Schrotz-King; Jenny Chang-Claude; Erin M Siegel; Karen Steindorf; Robert W Owen; Jennifer Ose; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.900

4.  Effects of chronic endurance exercise training on serum 25(OH)D concentrations in elderly Japanese men.

Authors:  Xiaomin Sun; Zhen-Bo Cao; Kumpei Tanisawa; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Takafumi Kubo; Mitsuru Higuchi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Vitamin D Metabolism and Guidelines for Vitamin D Supplementation.

Authors:  Indra Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

6.  The effect of body composition and BMI on 25(OH)D response in vitamin D-supplemented athletes.

Authors:  Evan P Cassity; Maja Redzic; Cassidy R Teager; D Travis Thomas
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.050

7.  Vitamin D-binding protein levels do not influence the effect of vitamin D repletion on serum PTH and calcium: data from a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Manish P Ponda; David McGee; Jan L Breslow
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Vitamin D and your patients: don't accept wimpy.

Authors:  Michael F Roizen; Jeffrey D Roizen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  25-Hydroxycholecalciferol response to single oral cholecalciferol loading in the normal weight, overweight, and obese.

Authors:  V Camozzi; A C Frigo; M Zaninotto; F Sanguin; M Plebani; M Boscaro; L Schiavon; G Luisetto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Vitamin D Binding Protein and Vitamin D Levels in Multi-Ethnic Population.

Authors:  R A Merchant; R M van Dam; L W L Tan; M Y Lim; J L Low; J E Morley
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.