| Literature DB >> 23825110 |
Li Bian1, Michael Traurig, Robert L Hanson, Alejandra Marinelarena, Sayuko Kobes, Yunhua L Muller, Alka Malhotra, Ke Huang, Jessica Perez, Alex Gale, William C Knowler, Clifton Bogardus, Leslie J Baier.
Abstract
To identify genes that affect body mass index (BMI) in American Indians who are predominately of Pima Indian heritage, we previously completed a genome-wide association study in 1120 American Indians. That study also included follow-up genotyping for 9 SNPs in 2133 additional subjects. A comprehensive follow-up study has subsequently been completed where 292 SNPs were genotyped in 3562 subjects, of which 128 SNPs were assessed for replication in 3238 additional subjects. In the combined subjects (n = 6800), BMI associations for two SNPs, rs12882548 and rs11652094, approached genome-wide significance (P = 6.7 × 10(-7) and 8.1 × 10(-7), respectively). Rs12882548 is located in a gene desert on chromosome 14 and rs11652094 maps near MAP2K3. Several SNPs in the MAP2K3 region including rs11652094 were also associated with BMI in Caucasians from the GIANT consortium (P = 10(-2)-10(-5)), and the combined P-values across both American Indians and Caucasian were P = 10(-4)-10(-9). Follow-up sequencing across MAP2K3 identified several paralogous sequence variants indicating that the region may have been duplicated. MAP2K3 expression levels in adipose tissue biopsies were positively correlated with BMI, although it is unclear if this correlation is a cause or effect. In vitro studies with cloned MAP2K3 promoters suggest that MAP2K3 expression may be up-regulated during adipogenesis. Microarray analyses of mouse hypothalamus cells expressing constitutively active MAP2K3 identified several up-regulated genes involved in immune/inflammatory pathways and a gene, Hap1, thought to play a role in appetite regulation. We conclude that MAP2K3 is a reproducible obesity locus that may affect body weight via complex mechanisms involving appetite regulation and hypothalamic inflammation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23825110 PMCID: PMC3792696 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddt291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mol Genet ISSN: 0964-6906 Impact factor: 6.150
Longitudinally studied American Indians analyzed for BMI
| Sample | Mean age (years) ± SDa at max BMI (range) | Mean max BMI (kg/m2) ± SD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adults | |||
| Sample 1 | 3562 (1521/2038) | 36.1 ± 13.3 (15.0–81.7) | 37.4 ± 8.6b |
| Sample 2 | 3238 (1441/1797) | 28.9 ± 11.8 (15.0–85.3) | 34.6 ± 8.8b |
| Childhood | |||
| Sample 1 | 2404 (1077/1327) | 13.9 ± 4.0 (5.0–19.9) | 27.1 ± 6.5c |
| Sample 2 | 2920 (1336/1584) | 13.7 ± 3.8 (5.0–19.9) | 27.3 ± 7.0c |
aRefers to the mean age at which the highest BMI was recorded.
bFor adults, BMI is the maximum BMI recorded at age >15 years.
cFor the children, BMI is the maximum age and sex adjusted Z-score at age <20 years. For presentation, Z-scores are converted to BMI units using mean and standard deviation of 12-year-old Pima females.
SNPs with the strongest associations with BMI in the combined Sample 1 and Sample 2 (n = 6800)
| Chr | SNP | Risk/non-risk | Sample 1 ( | Sample 2 ( | Sample 1 + Sample 2 | Nearest gene | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freq risk | Betaa | Freq risk | Betaa | Freq risk | Betaa | |||||||
| 14 | rs12882548 | G/A | 0.13 | 0.037 | 2.0 × 10−6 | 0.13 | 0.025 | 5.7 × 10−3 | 0.13 | 0.030 | 6.7 × 10−7 | |
| 17 | rs11652094 | G/C | 0.73 | 0.024 | 3.9 × 10−5 | 0.65 | 0.022 | 1.2 × 10−3 | 0.69 | 0.022 | 8.1 × 10−7 | |
| 6 | rs4715352 | C/T | 0.31 | 0.029 | 7.9 × 10−7 | 0.45 | 0.013 | 0.037 | 0.38 | 0.021 | 1.3 × 10−6 | |
| 6 | rs9295592 | A/G | 0.69 | 0.020 | 7.7 × 10−4 | 0.64 | 0.022 | 1.2 × 10−3 | 0.67 | 0.020 | 8.3 × 10−6 | |
| 6 | rs12216336 | G/C | 0.88 | 0.032 | 1.1 × 10−4 | 0.78 | 0.023 | 3.5 × 10−3 | 0.83 | 0.026 | 9.1 × 10−6 | |
Freq, frequency.
SNPs representing five regions with the strongest associations for BMI in the combined Sample 1 + Sample 2 (n = 6800). A complete list of SNPs is given in Supplementary Material, Table S1. The P-values in the GWAS subjects alone, which are a subset of Sample 1, are also shown in Supplementary Material, Table S1.
aβ-Values represent the effect on the logarithmic scale per copy of the risk allele.
bP-values were adjusted for age, sex, birth year, family membership and American Indian heritage.
Figure 1.Relative positions and LD plot for the 17 common SNPs across the MAP2K3 locus in Pima Indians. LD is shown as r2 and the three tag SNPs are highlighted by boxes.
Association results for the three tag SNPs in the MAP2K3 region with maximum BMI recorded during adulthood and childhood in the longitudinally studied subjects
| SNP | Sample | Agea | Risk/non-risk | Freq risk allele | Mean BMI (kg/m2) ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk/risk | Risk/non-risk | Non-risk/non-risk | |||||||
| rs11652094 | Sample 1 | Adult BMI | G/C | 0.73 | 38.0 ± 8.7 | 37.0 ± 8.7 | 35.3 ± 7.3 | 0.024 | 3.9 × 10−5 |
| Childhood BMI | 27.6 ± 6.6 | 26.8 ± 6.5 | 26.1 ± 6.4 | 0.11 | 7.5 × 10−4 | ||||
| Sample 2 | Adult BMI | 0.65 | 35.7 ± 9.2 | 34.1 ± 8.4 | 33.0 ± 8.8 | 0.022 | 1.2 × 10−3 | ||
| Childhood BMI | 28.0 ± 7.1 | 27.1 ± 6.8 | 25.9 ± 6.0 | 0.098 | 1.4 × 10−3 | ||||
| Sample 1 + 2 | Adult BMI | 0.69 | 37.0 ± 8.9 | 35.6 ± 8.7 | 33.9 ± 8.4 | 0.022 | 8.1 × 10−7 | ||
| Childhood BMI | 27.8 ± 6.9 | 27.0 ± 6.7 | 26.0 ± 6.2 | 0.099 | 1.0 × 10−5 | ||||
| rs10468608 | Sample 1 | Adult BMI | C/T | 0.77 | 37.7 ± 8.7 | 37.1 ± 8.6 | 35.6 ± 7.4 | 0.018 | 4.6 × 10−3 |
| Childhood BMI | 27.4 ± 6.5 | 26.9 ± 6.6 | 26.7 ± 6.5 | 0.077 | 0.031 | ||||
| Sample 2 | Adult BMI | 0.75 | 35.2 ± 9.0 | 34.0 ± 8.4 | 33.1 ± 8.7 | 0.022 | 2.0 × 10−3 | ||
| Childhood BMI | 27.7 ± 7.0 | 27.1 ± 6.8 | 26.0 ± 5.9 | 0.087 | 8.9 × 10−3 | ||||
| Sample 1 + 2 | Adult BMI | 0.76 | 36.6 ± 8.9 | 35.6 ± 8.7 | 34.2 ± 8.2 | 0.018 | 1.2 × 10−4 | ||
| Childhood BMI | 27.5 ± 6.8 | 27.0 ± 6.7 | 26.3 ± 6.2 | 0.076 | 1.8 × 10−3 | ||||
| rs12602109 | Sample 1 | Adult BMI | G/A | 0.96 | 37.6 ± 8.6 | 35.1 ± 7.8 | 31.7 ± 5.6 | 0.056 | 3.6 × 10−5 |
| Childhood BMI | 27.3 ± 6.6 | 25.1 ± 5.7 | 21.3 ± 1.9 | 0.29 | 8.1 × 10−5 | ||||
| Sample 2 | Adult BMI | 0.92 | 34.7 ± 8.8 | 33.7 ± 8.6 | 33.2 ± 11.6 | 0.005 | 0.72 | ||
| Childhood BMI | 27.4 ± 6.9 | 26.9 ± 6.7 | 26.0 ± 6.6 | 0.014 | 0.80 | ||||
| Sample 1 + 2 | Adult BMI | 0.94 | 36.3 ± 8.8 | 34.2 ± 8.4 | 33.0 ± 10.6 | 0.024 | 0.013 | ||
| Childhood BMI | 27.4 ± 6.8 | 26.4 ± 6.5 | 25.3 ± 6.3 | 0.09 | 0.044 | ||||
aAdult BMI is the highest BMI recorded from an exam at age >15 years. Childhood BMI is the highest age and sex adjusted Z-score from an exam at age <20 years. For presentation, the Z-scores were sex and age (female, 12 year) standardized to a BMI scale.
bβ-Values represent the effect on the logarithmic scale per copy of the risk allele.
cP-values were adjusted for age, sex, birth year, family membership and American Indian heritage.
Association of rs11652094 and rs10468608 with obesity-related traits among American Indians who had been metabolically phenotyped
| rs11652094 (G/C) | rs10468608 (C/T) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GC | CC | CC | CT | TT | |||
| Male/Female ( | 171/123 | 124/73 | 18/23 | ― | 194/130 | 108/76 | 12/13 | ― |
| Age (years) | 26.9 ± 6.0 | 26.6 ± 6.3 | 26.7 ± 6.0 | ― | 27.1 ± 6.0 | 26.4 ± 6.4 | 25.6 ± 5.8 | ― |
| Fat free mass (kg)a | 63.6 ± 13.3 | 61.4 ± 12.3 | 56.0 ± 12.0 | 9.0 × 10−3 | 63.3 ± 13.1 | 61.5 ± 12.6 | 56.0 ± 12.4 | 0.15 |
| Fat mass (kg)a | 33.6 ± 13.9 | 28.4 ± 12.6 | 26.5 ± 14.3 | 2.0 × 10−4 | 32.8 ± 13.9 | 29.6 ± 12.7 | 24.2 ± 16.1 | 0.01 |
| Percent body fata | 33.6 ± 8.2 | 30.6 ± 8.5 | 31.7 ± 9.8 | 1.0 × 10−3 | 33.0 ± 8.2 | 31.6 ± 8.5 | 30.0 ± 10.6 | 0.04 |
| Waist circumference (cm)a | 43.2 ± 7.0 | 40.7 ± 6.5 | 38.9 ± 6.7 | 9.0 × 10−5 | 42.8 ± 7.0 | 41.2 ± 6.6 | 37.9 ± 7.1 | 9.0 × 10−3 |
| Waist/thighb | 1.66 ± 0.17 | 1.61 ± 0.15 | 1.56 ± 0.17 | 2.0 × 10−4 | 1.65 ± 0.17 | 1.61 ± 0.16 | 1.54 ± 0.16 | 3.0 × 10−3 |
Data are given as raw (unadjusted) mean ± SD. P-values are given for an additive model and are adjusted for the following covariates.
aAge, sex, family membership and American Indian heritage.
bAge, sex, percent body fat, family membership, and American Indian heritage.
Association and meta-analysis for the SNPs in the MAP2K3 region with BMI in the combined sample of American Indians and Caucasians from the GIANT study
| SNP | Risk/non-risk | Combined American Indiansa | Caucasians (GIANT) | Meta-analysis | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Effects | Heterogeneity | Stouffer | |||||||||||
| Freq risk | Freq risk | I2 (%) | Z | ||||||||||
| rs7217373 | C/G | 0.69 | 0.020 | 9.7 × 10−6 | 0.34 | 0.016 | 1.4 × 10−3 | 0.020 | 2.6 × 10−5 | 91.3 | 6.9 × 10−4 | 5.35 | 8.9 × 10−8 |
| rs7217403 | C/T | 0.69 | 0.021 | 4.0 × 10−6 | 0.34 | 0.016 | 1.6 × 10−3 | 0.020 | 2.8 × 10−5 | 92.1 | 3.8 × 10−4 | 5.41 | 6.2 × 10−8 |
| rs11652094 | G/C | 0.69 | 0.022 | 8.1 × 10−7 | 0.33 | 0.019 | 2.1 × 10−4 | 0.024 | 1.8 × 10−6 | 92.0 | 4.1 × 10−4 | 5.90 | 3.6 × 10−9 |
| rs2001651 | C/A | 0.69 | 0.020 | 5.6 × 10−6 | 0.35 | 0.020 | 6.8 × 10−5 | 0.024 | 7.7 × 10−7 | 89.8 | 1.7 × 10−3 | 5.85 | 5.5 × 10−9 |
| rs10468608 | C/T | 0.76 | 0.018 | 1.2 × 10−4 | 0.65 | 0.009 | 7.1 × 10−2 | 0.013 | 7.2 × 10−3 | 90.2 | 1.4 × 10−3 | 3.94 | 8.1 × 10−5 |
| rs9901404 | A/G | 0.70 | 0.021 | 2.5 × 10−6 | 0.53 | 0.013 | 1.1 × 10−2 | 0.017 | 1.9 × 10−4 | 91.8 | 4.7 × 10−4 | 4.83 | 1.4 × 10−6 |
aCombined American Indians = Sample 1 + Sample 2. The β estimates are given per copy of the risk allele. For GIANT, β estimates were calculated based on an inverse Gaussian transformation of the ranks of BMI and represent the effect per copy of the allele in SD units. For comparison, β estimates for American Indians were also calculated based on an inverse Gaussian transformation (SD units); thus these estimates and P-values differ slightly from those presented elsewhere. The β estimate for the fixed effects meta-analysis across American Indians and GIANT is derived by the inverse variance method; I2 represents the percentage of the total variation between American Indians and Caucasians attributable to heterogeneity. Stouffer's method represents a test based on combining the P-values for association across American Indians and Caucasians. Freq, frequency.
Figure 2.Positive correlation of MAP2K3 gene expression levels in adipocytes with (A) body mass index (BMI) and (B) percent body fat. Prior to the analysis, relative MAP2K3 expression levels were logarithmically transformed to approximate the normal distribution. P-values were adjusted for age and sex.
Figure 3.Relative luciferase activities for (A) MAP2K3-A promoter and (B) MAP2K3-B promoter reporter vectors in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes treated without (−) and with (+) preadipocyte differentiation media. Luciferase assays were done in replicates of six and the results are shown as means ± SD.