Literature DB >> 23824920

Challenges of a mechanistic feedback model describing nicotinic acid-induced changes in non-esterified fatty acids in rats.

Christine Ahlström1, Lambertus A Peletier, Johan Gabrielsson.   

Abstract

Previously, we developed a feedback model to describe the tolerance and oscillatory rebound of non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) plasma concentrations in male Sprague Dawley rats after intravenous infusions of nicotinic acid (NiAc). This study challenges that model, using the following regimens of intravenous and oral NiAc dosing in male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 95) to create different patterns of exposure: (A) 30 min infusion at 0, 1, 5 or 20 μmol kg(-1) body weight; (B) 300 min infusion at 0, 5, 10 or 51 μmol kg(-1); (C) 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1), followed by a stepwise decrease in rate every 10 min for 180 min; (D) 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1), followed by a stepwise decrease in rate every 10 min for 180 min and another 30 min infusion at 5 μmol kg(-1) from 210 to 240 min; (E) an oral dose of 0, 24.4, 81.2 or 812 μmol kg(-1). Serial arterial blood samples were taken for measurement of plasma NiAc and NEFA concentrations. The gradual decrease in infusion rate in (C) and (D) were also designed to test the hypothesis that a gradual reduction in NiAc plasma concentration may be expected to reduce or prevent rebound. The absorption of NiAc was described by parallel linear and non-linear processes and the disposition of NiAc by a two-compartment model with endogenous turnover rate and two parallel capacity-limited elimination processes. NEFA (R) turnover, which was driven by the plasma concentration of NiAc via an inhibitory drug-mechanism function acting on NEFA formation, was described by a feedback model with a moderator distributed over a series of transit compartments, where the first compartment (M 1) inhibited the formation of R and the last compartment (M N ) stimulated the loss of R. All processes regulating the plasma NEFA concentration were assumed to be captured by the moderator function. Data were analyzed using non-linear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM). The potency IC 50 of NiAc was 68 nmol L(-1), the fractional turnover rate k out 0.27 L mmol(-1) min(-1), and the turnover rate of moderator k tol 0.023 min(-1). The lower physiological limit of NEFA, which was modeled as a NiAc-independent release (k cap ) of NEFA into plasma, was estimated to 0.023 mmol L(-1) min(-1). The parameter estimates derived in this study were consistent with our previous estimates, suggesting that the model may be used for prediction of the NEFA response time-course following different modes and routes administration of NiAc or NiAc analogues. In order to avoid NiAc-induced NEFA rebound, a slow decline in the NiAc exposure pattern is needed at or below IC (50).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23824920     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-013-9325-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  39 in total

1.  Permanent cannulation of aorta and vena cava in rats and ground squirrels.

Authors:  V POPOVIC; P POPOVIC
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  A nonlinear feedback model capturing different patterns of tolerance and rebound.

Authors:  Johan Gabrielsson; Lambertus A Peletier
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Likelihood based approaches to handling data below the quantification limit using NONMEM VI.

Authors:  Jae Eun Ahn; Mats O Karlsson; Adrian Dunne; Thomas M Ludden
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  A flexible nonlinear feedback system that captures diverse patterns of adaptation and rebound.

Authors:  Johan Gabrielsson; Lambertus A Peletier
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of furosemide tolerance after multiple intravenous administration.

Authors:  M Wakelkamp; G Alván; J Gabrielsson; G Paintaud
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Absorption of nicotinic acid and nicotinamide from rat small intestine in vitro.

Authors:  F Sadoogh-Abasian; D F Evered
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1980-05-23

7.  Molecular identification of nicotinic acid receptor.

Authors:  Takatoshi Soga; Masazumi Kamohara; Jun Takasaki; Shun-ichiro Matsumoto; Tetsu Saito; Takahide Ohishi; Hideki Hiyama; Ayako Matsuo; Hitoshi Matsushime; Kiyoshi Furuichi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Comparison of rat and dog models of vasodilatation and lipolysis for the calculation of a therapeutic index for GPR109A agonists.

Authors:  Ester Carballo-Jane; Lynn S Gerckens; Silvi Luell; Allison S Parlapiano; Michael Wolff; Steven L Colletti; James R Tata; Andrew K P Taggart; M Gerard Waters; Jeremy G Richman; Margaret E McCann; Michael J Forrest
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Influence of nicotinic acid on metabolism of cholesterol and triglycerides in man.

Authors:  S M Grundy; H Y Mok; L Zech; M Berman
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.922

10.  Effectiveness of low-dose crystalline nicotinic acid in men with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Authors:  R Martin-Jadraque; F Tato; J M Mostaza; G L Vega; S M Grundy
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-05-27
View more
  5 in total

1.  Modeling energy intake by adding homeostatic feedback and drug intervention.

Authors:  Peter Gennemark; Stephan Hjorth; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Feedback modeling of non-esterified fatty acids in obese Zucker rats after nicotinic acid infusions.

Authors:  Christine Ahlström; Tobias Kroon; Lambertus A Peletier; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Mixed Effects Modeling Using Stochastic Differential Equations: Illustrated by Pharmacokinetic Data of Nicotinic Acid in Obese Zucker Rats.

Authors:  Jacob Leander; Joachim Almquist; Christine Ahlström; Johan Gabrielsson; Mats Jirstrand
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Joint feedback analysis modeling of nonesterified fatty acids in obese Zucker rats and normal Sprague-Dawley rats after different routes of administration of nicotinic acid.

Authors:  Sofia Tapani; Joachim Almquist; Jacob Leander; Christine Ahlström; Lambertus A Peletier; Mats Jirstrand; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Modeling of free fatty acid dynamics: insulin and nicotinic acid resistance under acute and chronic treatments.

Authors:  Robert Andersson; Tobias Kroon; Joachim Almquist; Mats Jirstrand; Nicholas D Oakes; Neil D Evans; Michael J Chappel; Johan Gabrielsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.745

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.