Kelly W Sheppard1, Carol L Cheatham. 1. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biochemical and behavioral evidence has suggested that the ratio of n-6 (omega-6) to n-3 (omega-3) could be an important predictor of executive function abilities in children. OBJECTIVE: We determined the relation between the ratio of n-6 to n-3 and cognitive function in children. We hypothesized that children with lower ratios of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids would perform better on tests of planning and working memory. DESIGN: Seventy 7- to 9-y-old children completed three 24-h diet recalls and a subset of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Assessment Battery. Parents provided information on their demographics and children's diet histories. RESULTS: Mean n-3 and mean n-6 intakes were related to the mean time spent on each action taken in the planning problem. The ratio of n-6 to n-3 significantly predicted performance on the working memory and planning problems. There was a significant interaction between the ratio and fatty acid intake; when children had high ratios, a higher intake of n-3 fatty acids predicted a better performance on the planning task than when children had lower n-3 intakes. When children had low ratios, a lower intake of n-3 and lower intake of n-6 predicted better performance than when intakes were higher. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between cognitive abilities and the ratio of n-6 to n-3 may be mediated by an enzymatic affinity for n-3 fatty acids. The ratio of n-6 to n-3 should be considered an important factor in the study of fatty acids and cognitive development. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01823419.
BACKGROUND: Biochemical and behavioral evidence has suggested that the ratio of n-6 (omega-6) to n-3 (omega-3) could be an important predictor of executive function abilities in children. OBJECTIVE: We determined the relation between the ratio of n-6 to n-3 and cognitive function in children. We hypothesized that children with lower ratios of n-6 to n-3 fatty acids would perform better on tests of planning and working memory. DESIGN: Seventy 7- to 9-y-old children completed three 24-h diet recalls and a subset of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Assessment Battery. Parents provided information on their demographics and children's diet histories. RESULTS: Mean n-3 and mean n-6 intakes were related to the mean time spent on each action taken in the planning problem. The ratio of n-6 to n-3 significantly predicted performance on the working memory and planning problems. There was a significant interaction between the ratio and fatty acid intake; when children had high ratios, a higher intake of n-3 fatty acids predicted a better performance on the planning task than when children had lower n-3 intakes. When children had low ratios, a lower intake of n-3 and lower intake of n-6 predicted better performance than when intakes were higher. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between cognitive abilities and the ratio of n-6 to n-3 may be mediated by an enzymatic affinity for n-3 fatty acids. The ratio of n-6 to n-3 should be considered an important factor in the study of fatty acids and cognitive development. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01823419.
Authors: J J Strain; Alison J Yeates; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Sally W Thurston; Maria S Mulhern; Emeir M McSorley; Gene E Watson; Tanzy M Love; Tristram H Smith; Kelley Yost; Donald Harrington; Conrad F Shamlaye; Juliette Henderson; Gary J Myers; Philip W Davidson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Byron A Foster; Elia Escaname; Theresa L Powell; Benjamin Larsen; Sartaj K Siddiqui; John Menchaca; Christian Aquino; Rajam Ramamurthy; Daniel E Hale Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Tora Mitra-Ganguli; Soumik Kalita; Sakshi Bhushan; Con Stough; James Kean; Nan Wang; Vidhu Sethi; Anuradha Khadilkar Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Helen Macpherson; Sarah Brownell; Rachel L Duckham; Barbara Meyer; Sam Mirzaee; Robin M Daly Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 2.692