Literature DB >> 23824564

Metabolomic signatures of aggressive prostate cancer.

Jonathan E McDunn1, Zhen Li, Klaus-Peter Adam, Bruce P Neri, Robert L Wolfert, Michael V Milburn, Yair Lotan, Thomas M Wheeler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current diagnostic techniques have increased the detection of prostate cancer; however, these tools inadequately stratify patients to minimize mortality. Recent studies have identified a biochemical signature of prostate cancer metastasis, including increased sarcosine abundance. This study examined the association of tissue metabolites with other clinically significant findings.
METHODS: A state of the art metabolomics platform analyzed prostatectomy tissues (331 prostate tumor, 178 cancer-free prostate tissues) from two independent sites. Biochemicals were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses identified metabolites associated with cancer aggressiveness: Gleason score, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle and lymph node involvement.
RESULTS: Prostate tumors had significantly altered metabolite profiles compared to cancer-free prostate tissues, including biochemicals associated with cell growth, energetics, stress, and loss of prostate-specific biochemistry. Many metabolites were further associated with clinical findings of aggressive disease. Aggressiveness-associated metabolites stratified prostate tumor tissues with high abundances of compounds associated with normal prostate function (e.g., citrate and polyamines) from more clinically advanced prostate tumors. These aggressive prostate tumors were further subdivided by abundance profiles of metabolites including NAD+ and kynurenine. When added to multiparametric nomograms, metabolites improved prediction of organ confinement (AUROC from 0.53 to 0.62) and 5-year recurrence (AUROC from 0.53 to 0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings support and extend earlier metabolomic studies in prostate cancer and studies where metabolic enzymes have been associated with carcinogenesis and/or outcome. Furthermore, these data suggest that panels of analytes may be valuable to translate metabolomic findings to clinically useful diagnostic tests.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical heterogeneity; diagnosis; metabolomics; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23824564     DOI: 10.1002/pros.22704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  57 in total

Review 1.  Metabolomic profiling of hormone-dependent cancers: a bird's eye view.

Authors:  Stacy M Lloyd; James Arnold; Arun Sreekumar
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 2.  NMR-based metabolomics studies of human prostate cancer tissue.

Authors:  Ana Rita Lima; Joana Pinto; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Márcia Carvalho; Paula Guedes de Pinho
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Recent Advances in Metabolic Profiling And Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Roopa Thapar; Mark A Titus
Journal:  Curr Metabolomics       Date:  2014-04

Review 4.  Inflammation and prostate cancer: friends or foe?

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Elisa Pedretti; Giuseppe Di Caro; Elena Monica Borroni; Federica Marchesi; Fabio Grizzi
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.575

5.  Sample size determination for logistic regression on a logit-normal distribution.

Authors:  Seongho Kim; Elisabeth Heath; Lance Heilbrun
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 6.  Metabolic Vulnerabilities of Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Giorgia Zadra; Massimo Loda
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  Synergistic action of image-guided radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Locke; Alan Dal Pra; Stéphane Supiot; Padraig Warde; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Metabolomic Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: Prediction, Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis, and Recurrence.

Authors:  Rachel S Kelly; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Edward Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a new approach for improvement of early diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Guo-Qiang Liao; Xiao-Fei Wen; Wei-Hua Chen; Sheng Cheng; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Roman Ganzer; Jochen Neuhaus
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Nov.       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  The ternary complex factor protein ELK1 is an independent prognosticator of disease recurrence in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Luke Pardy; Rayna Rosati; Claire Soave; Yanfang Huang; Seongho Kim; Manohar Ratnam
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.