Literature DB >> 23824496

Incidence, treatment, and consequences of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in the inpatient and outpatient settings.

Derek Weycker1, Richard Barron, Alex Kartashov, Jason Legg, Gary H Lyman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the incidence, treatment, and consequences of febrile neutropenia across inpatient and outpatient care settings.
METHODS: Data were obtained from Humedica's National Electronic Health Record-Derived Longitudinal Patient-Level Database (2007-2010). The study population included adult patients who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy for a solid tumor or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. For each patient, each chemotherapy regimen course and each cycle within each regimen course was characterized. Febrile neutropenia episodes were identified on a cycle-specific basis based on any of the following: (1) absolute neutrophil count <1.0 × 10(9)/L and evidence of infection or fever; (2) inpatient diagnosis of neutropenia, fever, or infection; (3) outpatient diagnosis of neutropenia and non-prophylactic antimicrobial use; or (4) mention of febrile neutropenia in physician notes. Febrile neutropenia episodes were categorized as inpatient or outpatient based on the initial setting of care (i.e. acute-care inpatient facility vs. ambulatory care facility). Febrile neutropenia consequences included hospital length of stay and mortality (inpatient cases only), as well as number of febrile neutropenia-related outpatient encounters.
RESULTS: Among the 2131 patients in this study, 401 experienced a total of 458 febrile neutropenia episodes. Risk of febrile neutropenia during the chemotherapy regimen course was 16.8% (95% CI: 15.3, 18.4). In cycle 1 alone, risk of febrile neutropenia was 8.1% (7.1, 9.3). Most febrile neutropenia episodes (83.2%) were initially treated in the inpatient setting; the hospital mortality rate was 8.1% (5.8, 11.1), and mean hospital length of stay was 8.4 days (7.7, 9.1). Among febrile neutropenia episodes initially treated in the outpatient setting (16.8%), the mean number of outpatient management encounters was 2.6 (2.1, 3.1), most of which were in the physician's office (69.2%) or emergency department (26.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Febrile neutropenia remains a common occurrence among patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy and typically results in extended hospitalization and, for many patients, death. A minority of patients are, however, treated exclusively on an outpatient basis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Febrile neutropenia; incidence; length of stay; mortality; treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23824496     DOI: 10.1177/1078155213492450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  21 in total

1.  Management and Preventive Measures for Febrile Neutropenia.

Authors:  Austin J Lucas; Jacqueline L Olin; Megan D Coleman
Journal:  P T       Date:  2018-04

2.  Relationship between severity and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and risk of infection among patients with nonmyeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Yanli Li; Zandra Klippel; Xiaolong Shih; Maureen Reiner; Hong Wang; John H Page
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia among pediatric cancer patients in Egypt: Risks and consequences.

Authors:  Mohamed Badr; Tamer Hassan; Hanan Sakr; Nehad Karam; Doaa Abdel Rahman; Doaa Shahbah; Marwa Zakaria; Sahbaa Fehr
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12

4.  Hospitalizations, outcomes, and management costs of febrile neutropenia in patients from a managed care population.

Authors:  Aniket A Kawatkar; Albert J Farias; Chun Chao; Wansu Chen; Richard Barron; Florian D Vogl; David B Chandler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor pegfilgrastim (lipegfilgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Ivetta Danylesko; Rina Sareli; Nira Varda-Bloom; Ronit Yerushalmi; Noga Shem-Tov; Hila Magen; Avichai Shimoni; Arnon Nagler
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Clinical practice in secondary prophylaxis and management of febrile neutropenia in Poland: results of the febrile neutropenia awareness project.

Authors:  Marek Wojtukiewicz; Ewa Chmielowska; Emilia Filipczyk-Cisarż; Krzysztof Krzemieniecki; Krzysztof Leśniewski-Kmak; Maria M Litwiniuk; Karolina Wieruszewska-Kowalczyk; Elżbieta Kosno-Kruszewska
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2014-12-31

7.  Results of high-risk neutropenia therapy of hematology-oncology patients in a university hospital in Uruguay.

Authors:  Matilde Boada Burutaran; Regina Guadagna; Sofia Grille; Mariana Stevenazzi; Cecilia Guillermo; Lilian Diaz
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2014-11-21

8.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kelly Fust; Xiaoyan Li; Michael Maschio; Guillermo Villa; Anju Parthan; Richard Barron; Milton C Weinstein; Luc Somers; Caroline Hoefkens; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Factors associated with hospital length of stay among cancer patients with febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Regis G Rosa; Luciano Z Goldani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Integrative omics to detect bacteremia in patients with febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Rachel S Kelly; Jessica Lasky-Su; Sai-Ching J Yeung; Richard M Stone; Jeffrey M Caterino; Sean C Hagan; Gary H Lyman; Lindsey R Baden; Brett E Glotzbecker; Christopher J Coyne; Christopher W Baugh; Daniel J Pallin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.