CONTEXT: Endometrium in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) presents altered gene expression indicating progesterone resistance and predisposing to reduced endometrial receptivity and endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that an altered endocrine/metabolic environment in PCOS may result in an endometrial "disease phenotype" affecting the gene expression of different endometrial cell populations, including stem cells and their differentiated progeny. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective study conducted at an academic medical center. PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proliferative-phase endometrium was obtained from 6 overweight/obese PCOS (National Institutes of Health criteria) and 6 overweight/obese controls. Microarray analysis was performed on fluorescence-activated cell sorting-isolated endometrial epithelial cells (eEPs), endothelial cells, stromal fibroblasts (eSFs), and mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs). Gene expression data were validated using microfluidic quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The comparison between eEP(PCOS) and eEP(Ctrl) showed dysregulation of inflammatory genes and genes with oncogenic potential (CCL2, IL-6, ORM1, TNAIFP6, SFRP4, SPARC). eSF(PCOS) and eSF(Ctrl) showed up-regulation of inflammatory genes (C4A/B, CCL2, ICAM1, TNFAIP3). Similarly, in eMSC(PCOS) vs eMSC(Ctrl), the most up-regulated genes were related to inflammation and cancer (IL-8, ICAM1, SPRR3, LCN2). Immunohistochemistry scoring showed increased expression of CCL2 in eEP(PCOS) and eSF(PCOS) compared with eEP(Ctrl) and eSF(Ctrl) and IL-6 in eEP(PCOS) compared with eEP(Ctrl). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated endometrial cell populations in women with PCOS showed altered gene expression revealing inflammation and prooncogenic changes, independent of body mass index, especially in eEP(PCOS) and eMSC(PCOS), compared with controls. The study reveals an endometrial disease phenotype in women with PCOS with potential negative effects on endometrial function and long-term health.
CONTEXT: Endometrium in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) presents altered gene expression indicating progesterone resistance and predisposing to reduced endometrial receptivity and endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that an altered endocrine/metabolic environment in PCOS may result in an endometrial "disease phenotype" affecting the gene expression of different endometrial cell populations, including stem cells and their differentiated progeny. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective study conducted at an academic medical center. PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proliferative-phase endometrium was obtained from 6 overweight/obese PCOS (National Institutes of Health criteria) and 6 overweight/obese controls. Microarray analysis was performed on fluorescence-activated cell sorting-isolated endometrial epithelial cells (eEPs), endothelial cells, stromal fibroblasts (eSFs), and mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs). Gene expression data were validated using microfluidic quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The comparison between eEP(PCOS) and eEP(Ctrl) showed dysregulation of inflammatory genes and genes with oncogenic potential (CCL2, IL-6, ORM1, TNAIFP6, SFRP4, SPARC). eSF(PCOS) and eSF(Ctrl) showed up-regulation of inflammatory genes (C4A/B, CCL2, ICAM1, TNFAIP3). Similarly, in eMSC(PCOS) vs eMSC(Ctrl), the most up-regulated genes were related to inflammation and cancer (IL-8, ICAM1, SPRR3, LCN2). Immunohistochemistry scoring showed increased expression of CCL2 in eEP(PCOS) and eSF(PCOS) compared with eEP(Ctrl) and eSF(Ctrl) and IL-6 in eEP(PCOS) compared with eEP(Ctrl). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated endometrial cell populations in women with PCOS showed altered gene expression revealing inflammation and prooncogenic changes, independent of body mass index, especially in eEP(PCOS) and eMSC(PCOS), compared with controls. The study reveals an endometrial disease phenotype in women with PCOS with potential negative effects on endometrial function and long-term health.
Authors: Emily J Fearnley; Louise Marquart; Amanda B Spurdle; Philip Weinstein; Penelope M Webb Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-10-17 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Sergei Grivennikov; Eliad Karin; Janos Terzic; Daniel Mucida; Guann-Yi Yu; Sivakumar Vallabhapurapu; Jürgen Scheller; Stefan Rose-John; Hilde Cheroutre; Lars Eckmann; Michael Karin Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Bart C J M Fauser; Basil C Tarlatzis; Robert W Rebar; Richard S Legro; Adam H Balen; Roger Lobo; Enrico Carmina; Jeffrey Chang; Bulent O Yildiz; Joop S E Laven; Jacky Boivin; Felice Petraglia; C N Wijeyeratne; Robert J Norman; Andrea Dunaif; Stephen Franks; Robert A Wild; Daniel Dumesic; Kurt Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Gabriel A Goldfien; Fatima Barragan; Joseph Chen; Margaret Takeda; Juan C Irwin; Jean Perry; Ruth M Greenblatt; Karen K Smith-McCune; Linda C Giudice Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: T T Piltonen; J C Chen; M Khatun; M Kangasniemi; A Liakka; T Spitzer; N Tran; H Huddleston; J C Irwin; L C Giudice Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: David W Erikson; Fatima Barragan; Terhi T Piltonen; Joseph C Chen; Shaina Balayan; Juan C Irwin; Linda C Giudice Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.285