Helen Levy1,2,3, Peter A Ubel4, Amanda J Dillard5, David R Weir1, Angela Fagerlin6,7,8. 1. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (HL, DRW). 2. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (HL) 3. Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (HL) 4. Fuqua School of Business, Sanford School of Public Policy, and School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (PAU) 5. Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI (AJD) 6. VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI (AF) 7. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (AF) 8. Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI (AF)
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Existing research concludes that measures of general numeracy can be used to predict individuals' ability to assess health risks. We posit that the domain in which questions are posed affects the ability to perform mathematical tasks, raising the possibility of a separate construct of "health numeracy" that is distinct from general numeracy. The objective was to determine whether older adults' ability to perform simple math depends on domain. METHODS: Community-based participants completed 4 math questions posed in 3 different domains: a health domain, a financial domain, and a pure math domain. Participants were 962 individuals aged 55 and older, representative of the community-dwelling US population over age 54. RESULTS: We found that respondents performed significantly worse when questions were posed in the health domain (54% correct) than in either the pure math domain (66% correct) or the financial domain (63% correct). Our experimental measure of numeracy consisted of only 4 questions, and it is possible that the apparent effect of domain is specific to the mathematical tasks that these questions require. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that health numeracy is strongly related to general numeracy but that the 2 constructs may not be the same. Further research is needed into how different aspects of general numeracy and health numeracy translate into actual medical decisions.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Existing research concludes that measures of general numeracy can be used to predict individuals' ability to assess health risks. We posit that the domain in which questions are posed affects the ability to perform mathematical tasks, raising the possibility of a separate construct of "health numeracy" that is distinct from general numeracy. The objective was to determine whether older adults' ability to perform simple math depends on domain. METHODS: Community-based participants completed 4 math questions posed in 3 different domains: a health domain, a financial domain, and a pure math domain. Participants were 962 individuals aged 55 and older, representative of the community-dwelling US population over age 54. RESULTS: We found that respondents performed significantly worse when questions were posed in the health domain (54% correct) than in either the pure math domain (66% correct) or the financial domain (63% correct). Our experimental measure of numeracy consisted of only 4 questions, and it is possible that the apparent effect of domain is specific to the mathematical tasks that these questions require. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that health numeracy is strongly related to general numeracy but that the 2 constructs may not be the same. Further research is needed into how different aspects of general numeracy and health numeracy translate into actual medical decisions.
Entities:
Keywords:
cognition; health literacy; health numeracy
Authors: Andrea J Apter; Jing Cheng; Dylan Small; Ian M Bennett; Claire Albert; Daniel G Fein; Maureen George; Simone Van Horne Journal: J Asthma Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Kerri Cavanaugh; Mary Margaret Huizinga; Kenneth A Wallston; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Ayumi Shintani; Dianne Davis; Rebecca Pratt Gregory; Lynn Fuchs; Robb Malone; Andrea Cherrington; Michael Pignone; Darren A DeWalt; Tom A Elasy; Russell L Rothman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Amelia Maiga; Farhood Farjah; Jeffrey Blume; Stephen Deppen; Valerie F Welty; Richard S D'Agostino; Graham A Colditz; Benjamin D Kozower; Eric L Grogan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Maarten Cuypers; Romy E D Lamers; Paul J M Kil; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Marieke de Vries Journal: Trials Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 2.279