Literature DB >> 23824395

Spectrum of radiographic femoroacetabular impingement morphology in adolescents and young adults: an EOS-based double-cohort study.

Matthew R Schmitz1, Bernd Bittersohl, Daniela Zaps, James D Bomar, Andrew T Pennock, Harish S Hosalkar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement is a known prearthritic condition. Impingement morphology is poorly defined in the adolescent population. The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence of radiographic impingement morphology in adolescents with no symptomatic hip problems.
METHODS: Ninety anteroposterior images of the hip in forty-five consecutive adolescents with scoliosis met the inclusion criteria. Sex distribution was equal. The second cohort (ninety hips) was an age-matched group with no scoliosis. None had symptomatic hip problems. Images were analyzed for coxa profunda, protrusio acetabuli, Tönnis angle, anteroposterior alpha angle, center-edge angle, acetabular crossover, ischial spine sign, and neck-shaft angle.
RESULTS: Of the 180 hips, 92.8% demonstrated at least one parameter suggesting impingement morphology, whereas 52.2% showed at least two signs. Evidence of coxa profunda was seen in 81.7% of the hips, while a negative Tönnis angle was seen in 31.1% and a center-edge angle indicative of acetabular overcoverage was seen in 15%. An acetabular crossover sign was detected in 27.2% of the hips, while an abnormal anteroposterior alpha angle was found in 5.6% of the hips in male patients and 6.7% of the hips in female patients. Statistical analysis revealed that abnormal alpha angles (p = 0.029), crossover signs (p = 0.029), and ischial spine signs (p = 0.026) were more common in the cohort without scoliosis, and coxa profunda was more common in females (p = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of radiographic impingement morphology beyond the spectrum of normal in this double-cohort study of adolescents. Femoroacetabular impingement remains a dynamic problem, and we caution against relying only on the use of hard-set static radiographic parameters when evaluating femoroacetabular impingement. This study raises the important question of what morphologic characteristics should be defined as abnormal, when at least one finding of impingement morphology is noted in such a large segment of the population. On the basis of the normative data obtained, reference values for radiographic parameters of femoroacetabular impingement morphology should be redefined. Normal values for a Tönnis angle were between -8° and 14°, the upper limit of the center-edge angle was 44°, and the normal values for femoral neck-shaft angle were between 121° and 144°. Surgical indications should be tailored to physical examination findings and not radiographic findings alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23824395     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

Review 1.  The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Jens Dargel; Johannes Oppermann; Peer Eysel; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Jan Bredow; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the proximal femur and the pelvis in children and adolescents using an upright biplanar slot-scanning X-ray system.

Authors:  Kinga Szuper; Ádám Tibor Schlégl; Eleonóra Leidecker; Csaba Vermes; Szabolcs Somoskeöy; Péter Than
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-08-26

3.  Analysis of spinal alignment and pelvic parameters on upright radiographs: implications for acetabular development.

Authors:  Andrew Pytiak; James D Bomar; Jonathan B Peterson; Matthew R Schmitz; Andrew T Pennock; Dennis R Wenger; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-04-04

Review 4.  Does high level youth sports participation increase the risk of femoroacetabular impingement? A review of the current literature.

Authors:  Viran de Silva; Michael Swain; Carolyn Broderick; Damien McKay
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.054

5.  The Modified Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle: Age- and Sex-Dependent Reference Values and Reliability Analysis.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Michael Frink; Janine Jostmeier; Stefan Haneder; Jens Dargel; Peer Eysel; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Radiographic Diagnosis of Pincer-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chanseok Rhee; Tina Le Francois; J W Thomas Byrd; Mark Glazebrook; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-31

7.  Utility of Intra-articular Hip Injections for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Wahab Khan; Moin Khan; Hussain Alradwan; Ryan Williams; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Long-term Evolution of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Treated by in Situ Fixation: A 26 Years Follow-up of 11 Hips.

Authors:  Jérôme Murgier; Jérôme Sales de Gauzy; Fouad C Jabbour; Xavier Bayle Iniguez; Etienne Cavaignac; Régis Pailhé; Franck Accadbled
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-06-03

9.  The 'triradiate bump': a novel radiographic sign that may confound assessment of acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  William Z Morris; Ryan T Li; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 10.  Hip Osteoarthritis: Etiopathogenesis and Implications for Management.

Authors:  Nicholas J Murphy; Jillian P Eyles; David J Hunter
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.