Literature DB >> 23823826

Equity of health service utilization of urban residents: data from a western Chinese city.

Ying Mao1, Fei Xu, Ming-jun Zhang, Jin-lin Liu, Jie Yang, Mei-juan Wang, Si-feng Zhang, Yue-lin Zhang, Jian-qun Yan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Getting medical treatment is still difficult and expensive in western China. Improving the equity of basic health services is one of the tasks of the new healthcare reform in China. This study aimed to analyze the parallel and vertical equity of health service utilization of urban residents and then find its influencing factors.
METHODS: In August 2011, a household survey was conducted at 18 communities of Baoji City by multi-stage stratified random sampling. Based on the survey data, we calculated a concentration index of health service utilization for different income residents and a difference index of different ages. We then investigated the influencing factors of health service utilization by employing the Logistic regression model and log-linear regression model.
RESULTS: The two-week morbidity rate of sampled residents was 19.43%, the morbidity rate of chronic diseases was 21.68%, and the required hospitalization rate after medical diagnosis was 11.36%. Among out-patient service utilization, the two-week out-patient rate, number of two-week out-patients, and out-patient expense had good parallel and vertical equity, while out-patient compensation expense had poor parallel and vertical equity. The inpatient service utilization, hospitalization rate, number of inpatients, days stayed in the hospital, and inpatient expense had good parallel equity, while inpatient compensation expense had poor parallel equity. While the hospitalization rate and number of inpatients had vertical equity, the days stayed in hospital, inpatient expense, and inpatient compensation expense had vertical inequity.
CONCLUSIONS: Urban residents' health was at a low level and there was not good health service utilization. There existed rather poor equity of out-patient compensation expense. The equity of inpatient service utilization was quite poor. Income difference and the type of medical insurance had great effects on the equity of health service utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23823826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  6 in total

1.  Correlates of unequal access to preventive care in China: a multilevel analysis of national data from the 2011 China Health and Nutrition Survey.

Authors:  Chi Huang; Chao-Jie Liu; Xiong-Fei Pan; Xiang Liu; Ning-Xiu Li
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Analysis of the equity of emergency medical services: a cross-sectional survey in Chongqing city.

Authors:  Yalan Liu; Yi Jiang; Shenglan Tang; Jingfu Qiu; Xiaoni Zhong; Yang Wang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-12-21

3.  Inequality in the distribution of health resources and health services in China: hospitals versus primary care institutions.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Yongjian Xu; Jianping Ren; Liqi Sun; Chaojie Liu
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-03-03

4.  Influencing factors of inequity in health services utilization among the elderly in China.

Authors:  Xianzhi Fu; Nan Sun; Fei Xu; Jin Li; Qixin Tang; Junjian He; Dongdong Wang; Changqing Sun
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2018-09-15

5.  Association between obesity and sickness in the past two weeks among middle-aged and elderly women: A cross-sectional study in Southern China.

Authors:  Li-Ying Fu; Xiao-Xiao Wang; Xiao Wu; Bo Li; Ling-Ling Huang; Bing-Bing Li; Qing-Feng Du; Pei-Xi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Socioeconomic inequality in health care use among cancer patients in China: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.

Authors:  Huiru Zhang; Yu Fu; Mingsheng Chen; Lei Si
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.