Literature DB >> 23823495

Coevolution with phages does not influence the evolution of bacterial mutation rates in soil.

Pedro Gómez1, Angus Buckling.   

Abstract

Coevolution with phages drive the evolution of high bacterial mutation rates in vitro, but the relevance of this finding to natural populations is unclear. Here, we investigated how coevolution affects mutation rate evolution in soil, in the presence and absence of the rest of the natural microbial community. Although mutation rate on average increased threefold, neither coevolving phages nor the rest of natural community significantly affected mutation rates. Our results suggest that features of the soil over and above directly interacting organisms constrain the evolution of strong mutators, helping to explain their relatively low frequency compared with some laboratory and clinical settings.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23823495      PMCID: PMC3806259          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  20 in total

Review 1.  Determining mutation rates in bacterial populations.

Authors:  W A Rosche; P L Foster
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage.

Authors:  Angus Buckling; Paul B Rainey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria.

Authors:  O Tenaillon; B Toupance; H Le Nagard; F Taddei; B Godelle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The evolution of low mutation rates in experimental mutator populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Michael J McDonald; Yu-Ying Hsieh; Yen-Hsin Yu; Shang-Lin Chang; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Coevolution with viruses drives the evolution of bacterial mutation rates.

Authors:  Csaba Pal; María D Maciá; Antonio Oliver; Ira Schachar; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Short-term rates of parasite evolution predict the evolution of host diversity.

Authors:  A Buckling; D J Hodgson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Local adaptation of bacteriophages to their bacterial hosts in soil.

Authors:  Michiel Vos; Philip J Birkett; Elizabeth Birch; Robert I Griffiths; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Bacteria-phage antagonistic coevolution in soil.

Authors:  Pedro Gómez; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The balance between mutators and nonmutators in asexual populations.

Authors:  Michael M Desai; Daniel S Fisher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli.

Authors:  P D Sniegowski; P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Phage selection for bacterial cheats leads to population decline.

Authors:  Marie Vasse; Clara Torres-Barceló; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Experimental evolution and bacterial resistance: (co)evolutionary costs and trade-offs as opportunities in phage therapy research.

Authors:  Pauline D Scanlan; Angus Buckling; Alex R Hall
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 3.  Bacteriophages and its applications: an overview.

Authors:  Sonika Sharma; Soumya Chatterjee; Sibnarayan Datta; Rishika Prasad; Dharmendra Dubey; Rajesh Kumar Prasad; Mohan G Vairale
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Lytic phages obscure the cost of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Samuel J Tazzyman; Alex R Hall
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 5.  Community context matters for bacteria-phage ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Michael Blazanin; Paul E Turner
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 6.  Bacteria-phage coevolution as a driver of ecological and evolutionary processes in microbial communities.

Authors:  Britt Koskella; Michael A Brockhurst
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 7.  Interactions between bacterial and phage communities in natural environments.

Authors:  Anne Chevallereau; Benoît J Pons; Stineke van Houte; Edze R Westra
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 60.633

8.  Spatial patterns in phage-Rhizobium coevolutionary interactions across regions of common bean domestication.

Authors:  Jannick Van Cauwenberghe; Rosa I Santamaría; Patricia Bustos; Soledad Juárez; Maria Antonella Ducci; Trinidad Figueroa Fleming; Angela Virginia Etcheverry; Víctor González
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Local adaptation of a bacterium is as important as its presence in structuring a natural microbial community.

Authors:  Pedro Gómez; Steve Paterson; Luc De Meester; Xuan Liu; Luca Lenzi; M D Sharma; Kerensa McElroy; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Adaptation to Parasites and Costs of Parasite Resistance in Mutator and Nonmutator Bacteria.

Authors:  Sébastien Wielgoss; Tobias Bergmiller; Anna M Bischofberger; Alex R Hall
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.