Literature DB >> 23823041

Effect of distal interlock fixation in stable intertrochanteric fractures.

Patrick M Kane1, Bryan Vopat, David Paller, Sarath Koruprolu, Christopher T Born.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the torsion stiffness of locked and unlocked distal fixation of long cephalomedullary nail constructs, in both a fresh fracture and healed, stable intertrochanteric fracture model. Samples were tested in both internal and external rotation (0±3 Nm) for a duration of 10 cycles. Each femur was tested without instrumentation (intact femur), with instrumentation and no fracture (healed intertrochanteric fracture), and with instrumentation with an osteotomy creating a stable intertrochanteric fracture (fresh fracture). All specimens were instrumented with a long cephalomedullary nail. A distal interlock was placed in the dynamic position in 1 femur, and the other femur of the matched pair was left unlocked. Mean external (ER) and internal (IR) rotation stiffness for intact femurs without instrumentation (ER, 2.1±0.5 Nm/degree; IR, 2.2±0.5 Nm/degree) was statistically stiffer (P<.05 for all) compared with fresh fractured locked (ER, 1.1±0.2 Nm/degree; IR, 1.1±0.3 Nm/degree) and fresh fractured unlocked (ER, 0.9±0.3 Nm/degree; IR, 1.0±0.2 Nm/degree) samples. Similarly, healed locked (ER, 2.5±0.2 Nm/degree; IR, 2.8±0.1 Nm/degree) and healed unlocked (ER, 2.5±0.5 Nm/degree; IR, 2.4±0.3 Nm/degree) samples had statistically higher stiffness compared with fresh fractured treatments. These results suggest that the unlocked distal constructs provide similar torsional strength compared with locked fixation in these models. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23823041     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130624-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  7 in total

1.  Is distal locking of long nails for intertrochanteric fractures necessary? A clinical study.

Authors:  Bryan G Vopat; Patrick M Kane; Jeremy Truntzer; Philip McClure; David Paller; Emily Abbood; Christopher Born
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07-28

2.  Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures--a prospective comparative randomized study.

Authors:  Xing Li; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Zhao Meng; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A biomechanical comparison of locked and unlocked long cephalomedullary nails in a stable intertrochanteric fracture model.

Authors:  Patrick Kane; Bryan Vopat; David Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Alan H Daniels; Christopher Born
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Distal femoral complications following antegrade intramedullary nail placement.

Authors:  Amanda J Fantry; Gregory Elia; Bryan G Vopat; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2015-03-24

5.  Distal locked versus unlocked intramedullary nailing for stable intertrochanteric fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Hui Li; Tiecheng Yu; Wenjing Shao; Yanwei Liu; Dong Zhu; Lei Tan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The effects of distal interlocking screws on torsional stability in three-part intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Bryan G Vopat; Patrick M Kane; P Kaveh Mansuripur; David Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Emily Abbood; Christopher T Born
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-08-12

7.  Similar function and complications for patients with short versus long hip nailing for unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Ioannis P Galanopoulos; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Christos T Vottis; Evanthia Mitsiokapa; Panayiotis Koulouvaris; Dimitrios S Mastrokalos; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Vasilios A Kontogeorgakos
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-06-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.