Literature DB >> 2382290

A prospective controlled trial of cold-storage versus machine-perfusion preservation in cadaveric renal transplantation.

R M Merion1, H K Oh, F K Port, L H Toledo-Pereyra, J G Turcotte.   

Abstract

A prospective controlled study was carried out in 60 consecutive cadaver renal donors comparing cold storage to pulsatile machine-perfusion preservation. Each donor served as its own control, by allocating one of the kidneys to each of the two preservation methods. There were 51 evaluable pairs of kidneys. Recipient age, panel-reactive antibody level, history of prior renal transplant, and immunosuppressive regimen were similar in the two preservation groups. Almost all recipients were treated with cyclosporine, and over 50% received antilymphoblast globulin. Total cold ischemic time was 1262 +/- 387 min in the machine-perfused group and 1309 +/- 426 min in the cold-storage group (P = NS). Prolonged ischemia (greater than 24 hr) occurred in 31% of machine-perfused and 22% of cold-stored kidneys (P = NS). Post-operative serum creatinine levels at 1, 7, and 30 days posttransplant were similar in both groups. Dialysis requirements were also similar, with 21 recipients of machine-perfused kidneys (41%) requiring at least one dialysis treatment compared to 16 patients (31%) in the cold-stored group (P = NS); the mean number of dialysis treatments required was 3.14 +/- 1.46 and 3.06 +/- 1.29, respectively (P = NS). Long ischemic time (greater than 24 hr) was associated with a higher rate of dialysis requirement in both groups, but in neither case did this achieve statistical significance. The distribution of graft losses within the first 30 days was similar in both groups, and the incidence of preservation-related graft failure was not significantly different. These results demonstrate that, in the cyclosporine era, machine perfusion offers no significant advantages over cold storage for cadaver renal preservation. Because machine perfusion is considerably more expensive and cold storage is simpler and facilitates the logistics of organ sharing, we recommend simple hypothermic storage of renal allografts as the preservation method of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2382290     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199008000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

Review 1.  Free radical ablation for the prevention of post-ischemic renal failure following renal transplantation.

Authors:  H J Schiller; K A Andreoni; G B Bulkley
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1991-12-15

2.  Twenty-four hour hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of porcine pancreas facilitates processing for islet isolation.

Authors:  M J Taylor; S Baicu; B Leman; E Greene; A Vazquez; J Brassil
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Organ Preservation: Current Concepts and New Strategies for the Next Decade.

Authors:  Edgardo E Guibert; Alexander Y Petrenko; Cecilia L Balaban; Alexander Y Somov; Joaquín V Rodriguez; Barry J Fuller
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Phosphorus 31-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of rat liver during simple storage or continuous hypothermic perfusion.

Authors:  L Rossaro; N Murase; C Caldwell; H Farghali; A Casavilla; T E Starzl; C Ho; D H Van Thiel
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1992-10

Review 5.  Current state of hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of organs: The clinical perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Taylor; Simona C Baicu
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Samuel J Tingle; Rodrigo S Figueiredo; John Ag Moir; Michael Goodfellow; David Talbot; Colin H Wilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 7.  Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmer M Hameed; Henry C Pleass; Germaine Wong; Wayne J Hawthorne
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Machine Perfusion for Abdominal Organ Preservation: A Systematic Review of Kidney and Liver Human Grafts.

Authors:  Maria Irene Bellini; Mikhail Nozdrin; Janice Yiu; Vassilios Papalois
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.