Literature DB >> 23822592

Which is false: oxaliplatin or fluoropyrimidine? An analysis of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody.

Feng Wen1, Ruilei Tang, Yaxiong Sang, Meng Li, Qiancheng Hu, Zedong Du, Yi Zhou, Pengfei Zhang, Xiaofeng He, Qiu Li.   

Abstract

This meta-analysis was performed to determine whether the addition of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy treatment improves efficacy in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and whether infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin is a preferred combination for EGFR mAbs. Oxaliplatin (including treatment), EGFR mAbs, first-line treatment, KRAS wild-type, and mCRC were used as key words. The PRIME, OPUS, COIN, and NORDIC VII trials were identified by two independent authors. Time-to-event outcomes of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using HRs (hazard ratios) with fixed effect, and response rate (RR) using odd ratios (OR) with fixed effect. A total of 1767 patients who were KRAS wild-type were included in this meta-analysis, with 866 patients in the mAbs and chemotherapy combination group and 901 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. The addition of mAbs to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC as first-line treatment resulted in significant improvements in PFS (HR = 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.99; P = 0.03) and response rate (RR) (OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14-1.66; P = 0.009) compared with chemotherapy alone, but the difference in OS was not significant (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85-1.08; P = 0.48). However, the differences in OS and PFS were not significant when mAbs were added to bolus 5-FU or capecitabine-based regimens compared with chemotherapy alone, whereas PFS improved with an infusional 5-FU and oxaliplatin combination (P = 0.06; PFS, HR = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86; P = 0.0002), and even OS was marginally significant, which was consistent with the subgroup analysis of cetuximab and panitumumab. EGFR mAbs combined with oxaliplatin and an infusional 5-FU regimen was associated with significantly improved RR, PFS and OS as first-line treatment in KRAS wild-type mCRC.
© 2013 Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23822592     DOI: 10.1111/cas.12224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  4 in total

1.  Combination of cetuximab with radio-chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: less is more!

Authors:  Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Melanie Kripp; Sylvie Lorenzen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Sequencing of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: where to fit the target.

Authors:  Sally Temraz; Deborah Mukherji; Ali Shamseddine
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Successes and Limitations.

Authors:  A Coulson; A Levy; M Gossell-Williams
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 0.171

Review 4.  Treatment dilemmas of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Feng Wen; Qiu Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.