Literature DB >> 23822401

Point/Counterpoint. Patient-specific QA for IMRT should be performed using software rather than hardware methods.

Ramon Alfredo C Siochi1, Andrea Molineu, Colin G Orton.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23822401     DOI： 10.1118/1.4794929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN： 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Fiducial detection and registration for 3D IMRT QA with organ-specific dose information.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Wang; Olga Dona; Yuanguang Xu; John Adamovics; Cheng-Shie Wuu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using Geant4/Gate: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements.

Authors:  Adam H Aitkenhead; Peter Sitch; Jenny C Richardson; Carla Winterhalter; Imran Patel; Ranald I Mackay
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Yanqun Zhao; Guohai Qi; Gang Yin; Xianliang Wang; Pei Wang; Jian Li; Mingyong Xiao; Jie Li; Shengwei Kang; Xiongfei Liao
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Are simple IMRT beams more robust against MLC error? Exploring the impact of MLC errors on planar quality assurance and plan quality for different complexity beams.

Authors:  Jiazhou Wang; Xiance Jin; Jiayuan Peng; Jiang Xie; Junchao Chen; Weigang Hu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Parallel/Opposed: IMRT QA using treatment log files is superior to conventional measurement-based method.

Authors:  Nathan Childress; Quan Chen; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.

Authors:  Shi Liu; Thomas R Mazur; Harold Li; Austen Curcuru; Olga L Green; Baozhou Sun; Sasa Mutic; Deshan Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Validation of a modern second-check dosimetry system using a novel verification phantom.

Authors:  Daniel G McDonald; Dustin J Jacqmin; Christopher J Mart; Nicholas C Koch; Jean L Peng; Michael S Ashenafi; Mario A Fugal; Kenneth N Vanek
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review with a physics perspective.

Authors:  Byungchul Cho
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2018-03-30

9.  Evaluation of 4-Hz log files and secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation as patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT prostate plans.

Authors:  Philipp Szeverinski; Matthias Kowatsch; Thomas Künzler; Marco Meinschad; Patrick Clemens; Alexander F DeVries
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Predicting deliverability of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis.

Authors:  Kelly C Younge; Don Roberts; Lindsay A Janes; Carlos Anderson; Jean M Moran; Martha M Matuszak
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.