Literature DB >> 23821969

A prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study of bone remodeling after implantation of the Nanos short-stemmed prosthesis.

Alexander Zeh1, Franziska Pankow, Marc Röllinhoff, Stefan Delank, David Wohlrab.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the bone remodeling around the Nanos stem (Smith & Nephew, Marl, Germany) after primary total hip arthroplasty for coxarthrosis. In 25 patients (15 male, 10 female, mean age 59.9 years) with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis, a DEXA scan was performed immediately after surgery, 97 days (SD 6.1 days) and 368 days (SD 6.2 days) after implantation of a Nanos prosthesis. Plain radiographs were analyzed digitally for radiolucent lines, varus-valgus femoral stem alignment, measurement of stem migration and changes in varus-valgus femoral stem alignment. The position of the center of rotation (COR) and the offset were assessed pre- and postoperatively. Harris Hip Score was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. The DEXA scan showed a significant and relevant increase in BMD (Bone Mineral Density) in Gruen-Zone 6 (12%) and a decrease in Zone 1 (15%), 2 (5%) and 7 (12%), which was interpreted as reflecting a distal load transfer in the metaphysis of the femur. There was no clinically relevant migration or tilting of the Nanos stem. Radiolucent lines were noted in 12 cases, mainly at the polished tip area of the prosthesis; this was not regarded as a sign of impaired osseointegration. There was no significant difference between the position of the COR and the pre- and postoperative offset. The absence of stem migration, angulation, or relevant radiolucent lines is seen as evidence for an unimpaired osseointegration of the Nanos stem approximately 12 months after implantation. It is concluded that the Nanos prosthesis can reduce loss of BMD of the proximal femur composed with conventional stems or other short-stemmed implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23821969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  13 in total

1.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Development of periprosthetic bone mass density around the cementless Metha® short hip stem during three year follow up-a prospective radiological and clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Augustin; Sarah Boller; Cathrein Bobach; Alexander Jahnke; Gafar Adam Ahmed; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

4.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Patrick Weber; Arnd Steinbrück; Xingyi Hua; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Patterns of bone tracer uptake on SPECT-CT in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thierry Schweizer; Filippo-Franco Schiapparelli; Niccolo Rotigliano; Helmut Rasch; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses.

Authors:  Volker Brinkmann; Florian Radetzki; Karl Stefan Delank; David Wohlrab; Alexander Zeh
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-11

7.  Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.

Authors:  Rene Burchard; Sabrina Braas; Christian Soost; Jan Adriaan Graw; Jan Schmitt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve.

Authors:  Aditya Khemka; Omar Mograby; Sarah J Lord; Zelda Doyle; Munjed Al Muderis
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: The state of the art.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-09

Review 10.  Periprosthetic bone remodeling of short cementless femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Di Li; Shuai Yin; Xingyi Hua; Jian Tang; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.