AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in a multicentre setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was performed as part of the dal-VESSEL trial in which FMD was measured in 19 vascular imaging centres in six European countries. A subgroup of patients who were allocated in the placebo group and scanned twice at each trial time point (substudy) was analysed. Intra-sonographer variability was calculated from FMD measurements 48 h apart. Centre variability and short-, medium-, and long-term reproducibility of FMD were calculated at 48 h and at 3 and 9 months intervals, respectively. Intra- and inter-reader variability was assessed by re-analysing the FMD images by three certified readers at two time intervals, 7 days apart. Sixty-seven patients were included. Variability between centres was comparable at 48 h and 3 months interval but almost doubled at 9 months. The mean absolute difference in %FMD was 1.04, 0.99, and 1.45% at the three time intervals, respectively. Curves were generated to indicate the number of patients required for adequate power in crossover and parallel study designs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates for the first time that in a multicentre setting reproducible FMD measurements can be achieved for short- and medium-term evaluation, which are comparable with those reported from specialized laboratories. These findings justify the use of FMD as an outcome measure for short- and medium-term assessment of pharmacological interventions.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) in a multicentre setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was performed as part of the dal-VESSEL trial in which FMD was measured in 19 vascular imaging centres in six European countries. A subgroup of patients who were allocated in the placebo group and scanned twice at each trial time point (substudy) was analysed. Intra-sonographer variability was calculated from FMD measurements 48 h apart. Centre variability and short-, medium-, and long-term reproducibility of FMD were calculated at 48 h and at 3 and 9 months intervals, respectively. Intra- and inter-reader variability was assessed by re-analysing the FMD images by three certified readers at two time intervals, 7 days apart. Sixty-seven patients were included. Variability between centres was comparable at 48 h and 3 months interval but almost doubled at 9 months. The mean absolute difference in %FMD was 1.04, 0.99, and 1.45% at the three time intervals, respectively. Curves were generated to indicate the number of patients required for adequate power in crossover and parallel study designs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates for the first time that in a multicentre setting reproducible FMD measurements can be achieved for short- and medium-term evaluation, which are comparable with those reported from specialized laboratories. These findings justify the use of FMD as an outcome measure for short- and medium-term assessment of pharmacological interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Coronary artery disease; FMD; Power curve; Reproducibility
Authors: Paula Rodriguez-Miguelez; Nichole Lee; Matthew A Tucker; Gábor Csányi; Kathleen T McKie; Caralee Forseen; Ryan A Harris Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-08-31 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Paula Rodriguez-Miguelez; Nichole Seigler; Leon Bass; Thomas A Dillard; Ryan A Harris Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2015-09-16