Literature DB >> 23820705

Short dental implants: what works and what doesn't? A literature interpretation.

Douglas Deporter1.   

Abstract

Dental implants with lengths ≤ 8 mm have been used with success in posterior arch regions where significant alveolar ridge resorption has occurred. Nevertheless, many clinicians are reluctant to use them regularly, if at all. Key factors for success include implant surface roughness, surgical placement methods, and, possibly, implant diameter, all of which are discussed here.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23820705     DOI: 10.11607/prd.1304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Short implants had lower survival rates in posterior jaws compared to standard implants.

Authors:  Gary L Stafford
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-12

2.  Paradigm shift in the management of the atrophic posterior maxilla.

Authors:  Rabah Nedir; Nathalie Nurdin; Paul Khoury; Marc El Hage; Semaan Abi Najm; Mark Bischof
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-11-10

3.  A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.

Authors:  Xiaoran Yu; Ruogu Xu; Zhengchuan Zhang; Yang Yang; Feilong Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghavendra Shrishail Medikeri; Marisca Austin Pereira; Manjushri Waingade; Shwetambari Navale
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.086

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.