Literature DB >> 23820656

Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of endoscopic bipolar prostate resection versus monopolar resection technique. 3 year follow-up.

Roberto Giulianelli1, Luca Albanesi, Francesco Attisani, Barbara Cristina Gentile, Giorgio Vincenti, Francesco Pisanti, Teuta Shestani, Luca Mavilla, David Granata, Manlio Schettini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the current optimal thera- py for the relief of bladder outflow obstruction, with subjective and objective success rate of 85 to 90%. Aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of Plasmakinetic ener- gy (Gyrus electro surgical system), which produces vaporization of tissue immersed in isotonic saline against standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.
METHODS: From January 2002 to April 2002, 160 consecutive patients, who had low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomised to undergo bipolar TURP (80 patients) or monopolar TURP (80 patients). Preoperative work-up was assessed by administering IPSS, IIEF-5 and Qol questionnaires. All patients were submitted to uroflowmetry, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), post-voidal residual urine measurement and PSA determination. In the two groups, IPSS, IIEF-5 and Qol, uroflowme- try, TRUS, post-voidal residual urine measurement, PSA determination and number of reopera- tions were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months follow up, and then every year. Furthermore, in both groups operative time, resected tissue weight and perioperative complica- tions were analysed. Total postoperative catheter time, total post-operative hospital stay, haemo- globin loss were also recorded in the two groups.
RESULTS: Comparative data on IPSS symptom score, IIEF-5, Qol, PSA, peak urinary flow rate and post-void residual urine volume were similar in the two groups but showed a significant improve- ment respect to baseline values. The postoperative haemoglobin levels, postoperative catheteri- zation time, hospital stay and 3-year overall surgical re-treatment-free rate were significantly better in the bipolar group.
CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar TURP has a comparable outcome to standard monopolar TURP at short and medium term regard to subjective and objective outcome measurements. Its impact on blad- der outlet function is also similar to that of monopolar TURP. Improvement in IPSS, Qol index, IIEF-5, Qmax and post-void residual urine volume were comparable in both group denoting sim- ilar efficacy of the techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23820656     DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2013.2.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl        ISSN: 1124-3562


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yin Tang; Jinhong Li; Chuanxiao Pu; YunJin Bai; HaiChao Yuan; Qiang Wei; Ping Han
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Insulin plus incretin: A glucose-lowering strategy for type 2-diabetes.

Authors:  Bo Ahrén
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2014-02-15

3.  Five-Year Follow-Up Study of Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yangyang Hu; Xuecheng Dong; Guangchun Wang; Jianhua Huang; Min Liu; Bo Peng
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Plasmakinetic resection technology for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Joey S W Kwong; Xian-Tao Zeng; Xiao-Lan Ruan; Tong-Zu Liu; Hong Weng; Yi Guo; Chang Xu; Jin-Zhu Yan; Xiang-Yu Meng; Xing-Huan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate is a reliable minimal invasive technique for benign prostate hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Yao Li; Jing-Fei Teng; Hai-Yong Zhou; Dan-Feng Xu; Yi Fan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  A prospective randomized study comparing bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: efficacy, sexual function, Quality of Life, and complications.

Authors:  Hugo Otaola-Arca; Manuel Álvarez-Ardura; Roberto Molina-Escudero; Mario I Fernández; Álvaro Páez-Borda
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.

Authors:  Cameron Edwin Alexander; Malo Mf Scullion; Muhammad Imran Omar; Yuhong Yuan; Charalampos Mamoulakis; James Mo N'Dow; Changhao Chen; Thomas Bl Lam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-03

Review 8.  Are all procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia created equal? A systematic review on post-procedural PSA dynamics and its correlation with relief of bladder outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhat; Ruben Blachman-Braun; Thomas R W Herrmann; Hemendra N Shah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Operative outcomes and surgeon preferences, a real-world scenario.

Authors:  Vijay Kumar Sarma Madduri; Malay Kumar Bera; Dilip Kumar Pal
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate are equally effective and safe in this high quality randomized controled trial.

Authors:  Cristiano M Gomes; Julyana K M Moromizato; Thulio B V Brandão
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.