Literature DB >> 23820560

Jump-landing differences between varsity, club, and intramural athletes: the Jump-ACL Study.

Justin L Theiss1, J Parry Gerber, Kenneth L Cameron, Anthony I Beutler, Stephen W Marshall, Lindsay J Distefano, Darin A Padua, Sarah J de la Motte, Joseph M Miller, Craig A Yunker.   

Abstract

Abnormal movement patterns have been identified as important prospective risk factors for lower extremity injury, including anterior cruciate ligament injury. Specifically, poor neuromuscular control during the early landing phase has been associated with increased injury risk. Although it is commonly assumed that higher division collegiate athletes generally exhibit better movement patterns than lower division athletes, few studies compare the biomechanical differences on basic tasks such as jump landing between various levels of athletic groups. The objective of this study was to evaluate jump-landing and fitness differences among college-aged Intramural, Competitive Club, and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I level athletes. Two hundred seventy-seven student-athletes (222 men, 55 women; age 19.3 ± 0.8 years) categorized as NCAA Division I, Competitive Club, or Intramural level athletes were evaluated during a jump-landing task using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), a validated qualitative movement assessment. Fitness was measured using the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). Results showed no significant differences in landing errors between the levels of athletic group (F(2,267) = 0.36, p = 0.70). There was a significant difference in landing errors between genders (F(1,268) = 3.99, p = 0.05). Significant differences in APFT scores were observed between level of athletic group (F(2,267) = 11.14, p < 0.001) and gender (F(1,268) = 9.27, p = 0.003). There was no significant correlation between the APFT and LESS scores (p = 0.26). In conclusion, higher level athletes had better physical fitness as measured by the APFT but did not as a group exhibit better landing technique. The implications of this research suggest that "high-risk" movement patterns are prevalent in all levels of athletes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23820560     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a1fdcd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Evaluation of Field-Based Screening Methods for the Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury Risk.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The effect of landing surface on landing error scoring system grades.

Authors:  Kimberley Jacobs; Diego Riveros; Heather K Vincent; Daniel C Herman
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Association Between Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Items and the Incidence Rate of Lower Extremity Stress Fracture.

Authors:  Kenneth L Cameron; Karen Y Peck; Steven M Davi; Col Ret Brett D Owens; Col Ret Steven J Svoboda; Lindsay J DiStefano; Stephen W Marshall; Sarah J de la Motte; Col Ret Anthony I Beutler; Darin A Padua
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Effect of fatigue on landing performance assessed with the landing error scoring system (less) in patients after ACL reconstruction. A pilot study.

Authors:  A Gokeler; P Eppinga; P U Dijkstra; W Welling; D A Padua; E Otten; A Benjaminse
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-05

5.  Analyses of Landing Mechanics in Division I Athletes Using the Landing Error Scoring System.

Authors:  Joan James; Jatin P Ambegaonkar; Shane V Caswell; James Onate; Nelson Cortes
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.843

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.