David Boulos1, Mark A Zamorski. 1. Directorate of Mental Health, Canadian Forces Health Services Group Headquarters, Ottawa, Ont. david.boulos@forces.gc.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The conflict in Afghanistan has exposed more Canadian Forces personnel to a greater degree of adversity than at any time in recent memory. We determined the incidence of Afghanistan deployment-related mental disorders and associated risk factors among personnel previously deployed in support of this mission. METHODS: The study population consisted of 30,513 Canadian Forces personnel who began a deployment in support of the mission in Afghanistan before Jan. 1, 2009. The primary outcome was a mental disorder perceived by a Canadian Forces clinician to be related to the Afghanistan deployment. Data on diagnoses and perceptions were abstracted from medical records of a stratified random sample of 2014 personnel. Sample design weights were used in all analyses to generate descriptive statistics for the entire study population. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1364 days, 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1%-14.8%) of the study population had a mental disorder that was attributed to the Afghanistan deployment. Posttraumatic stress disorder was the most common diagnosis (in 8.0%, 95% CI 7.0%-9.0%, of personnel). Deployment to higher-threat locations, service in the Canadian Army and lower rank were independent risk factors associated with an Afghanistan-related diagnosis (e.g., hazard ratio for deployment to Kandahar Province 5.6, 95% CI 2.6-12.5, relative to deployment to the United Arab Emirates). In contrast, sex, Reserve Forces status, multiple deployments and deployment length were not independent risk factors. INTERPRETATION: An important minority of Canadian Forces personnel deployed in support of the Afghanistan mission had a diagnosis of a mental disorder perceived to be related to the deployment. Determining long-term outcomes is an important next step.
BACKGROUND: The conflict in Afghanistan has exposed more Canadian Forces personnel to a greater degree of adversity than at any time in recent memory. We determined the incidence of Afghanistan deployment-related mental disorders and associated risk factors among personnel previously deployed in support of this mission. METHODS: The study population consisted of 30,513 Canadian Forces personnel who began a deployment in support of the mission in Afghanistan before Jan. 1, 2009. The primary outcome was a mental disorder perceived by a Canadian Forces clinician to be related to the Afghanistan deployment. Data on diagnoses and perceptions were abstracted from medical records of a stratified random sample of 2014 personnel. Sample design weights were used in all analyses to generate descriptive statistics for the entire study population. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1364 days, 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1%-14.8%) of the study population had a mental disorder that was attributed to the Afghanistan deployment. Posttraumatic stress disorder was the most common diagnosis (in 8.0%, 95% CI 7.0%-9.0%, of personnel). Deployment to higher-threat locations, service in the Canadian Army and lower rank were independent risk factors associated with an Afghanistan-related diagnosis (e.g., hazard ratio for deployment to Kandahar Province 5.6, 95% CI 2.6-12.5, relative to deployment to the United Arab Emirates). In contrast, sex, Reserve Forces status, multiple deployments and deployment length were not independent risk factors. INTERPRETATION: An important minority of Canadian Forces personnel deployed in support of the Afghanistan mission had a diagnosis of a mental disorder perceived to be related to the deployment. Determining long-term outcomes is an important next step.
Authors: Charles W Hoge; Carl A Castro; Stephen C Messer; Dennis McGurk; Dave I Cotting; Robert L Koffman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James R Riddle; Tyler C Smith; Besa Smith; Thomas E Corbeil; Charles C Engel; Timothy S Wells; Charles W Hoge; Joyce Adkins; Mark Zamorski; Dan Blazer Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Bruce P Dohrenwend; J Blake Turner; Nicholas A Turse; Ben G Adams; Karestan C Koenen; Randall Marshall Journal: Science Date: 2006-08-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Elizabeth M Yano; Donna L Washington; Caroline Goldzweig; Fatma Batuman; Christine Huang; Isomi Miake-Lye; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2011 Jul-Aug
Authors: Mark A Zamorski; Rachel E Bennett; Corneliu Rusu; Murray Weeks; David Boulos; Bryan G Garber Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Mark A Zamorski; Rachel E Bennett; David Boulos; Bryan G Garber; Rakesh Jetly; Jitender Sareen Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 4.356