Literature DB >> 23820260

Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

S Nicholas Crawford1, Brian R Waterman, James H Lubowitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review and describe the cumulative incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture and/or clinical objective failures at greater than 10 years after ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: A PubMed search was performed to identify and systematically evaluate all studies performed between 1980 and 2012 with clinical outcomes after intra-articular, non-artificial ACL reconstruction and minimum 10-year follow-up. Studies reporting standardized surgical technique, ACL graft rupture, and objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade or ligament stability examination were included for analysis. After we first identified patients with graft rupture, clinical failure was further identified as 1 or more of the following: overall IKDC objective score of C or D, IKDC grade C or D pivot shift (i.e., >2+ or pivot shift), IKDC grade C or D Lachman examination, and/or abnormal KT arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) measurement (i.e., >5 mm). For this study, cumulative ACL failure rates were defined as the sum of both clinical failures and ACL graft ruptures.
RESULTS: After review and exclusion of 625 references, 14 studies were identified for subsequent review. At longer than 10 years' clinical follow-up, the reported ACL graft rupture rate was 6.2% (173 of 2,782) (range, 0% to 13.4%) and clinical failure occurred in approximately 10.3% (158 of 1,532) (range, 1.9% to 25.6%). The overall cumulative ACL failure rate was 11.9% (range, 3.2% to 27%).
CONCLUSIONS: At least 1 in 9 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction will have rerupture or clinical failure at long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II and IV studies. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23820260     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  65 in total

1.  Impingement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparing the direct versus indirect femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  J P van der List; H A Zuiderbaan; D H Nawabi; A D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  The Role of High Tibial Osteotomy in ACL Reconstruction in Knees with Coronal and Sagittal Plane Deformity.

Authors:  Michal Klek; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  Factors influencing the success of anterior cruciate ligament repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation.

Authors:  Anna M Krismer; Lampros Gousopoulos; Sandro Kohl; Atesch Ateschrang; Hendrik Kohlhof; Sufian S Ahmad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Fresh versus frozen engineered bone-ligament-bone grafts for sheep anterior cruciate ligament repair.

Authors:  Vasudevan D Mahalingam; Nilofar Behbahani-Nejad; Elizabeth A Ronan; Tyler J Olsen; Michael J Smietana; Edward M Wojtys; Deneen M Wellik; Ellen M Arruda; Lisa M Larkin
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 5.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic centralization restores residual knee laxity in ACL-reconstructed knee with a lateral meniscus defect.

Authors:  Tomomasa Nakamura; Monica A Linde; Brandon D Marshall; Hideyuki Koga; Takeshi Muneta; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Age over 50 years is not a contraindication for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Alberto Grassi; Simone Perelli; Giuseppe Agrò; Federico Bozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eoghan T Hurley; David A Bloom; Alexander Hoberman; Utkarsh Anil; Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas; Eric J Strauss; Michael J Alaia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Minimally Invasive Combined Anterior and Anterolateral Stabilization of the Knee Using Hamstring Tendons and Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation Device: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Achilleas Boutsiadis; Paul Brossard; Jean-Claude Panisset; Nicolas Graveleau; Johannes Barth
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-04-10

Review 10.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel size: causes of tunnel enlargement and implications for single versus two-stage revision reconstruction.

Authors:  Magda Rizer; Gregory Brian Foremny; Augustus Rush; Adam D Singer; Michael Baraga; Lee D Kaplan; Jean Jose
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.