Literature DB >> 23819818

Live anatomy of the perineal body in patients with third-degree rectocele.

F M E Wagenlehner1, E Del Amo, G A Santoro, P Petros.   

Abstract

AIM: In many pelvic floor disorders, the perineal body is damaged or destroyed. There is still a considerable variation in anatomical descriptions of the perineal body and even more debate with regard to its attachments and relationships. Cadaveric dissections do not always reflect the functional behaviour of structures in the pelvis and description of live anatomy on imaging studies is not always reliable. This study aimed to define the anatomy of the perineal body in patients with rectocele during the live dissection required for minimally invasive surgical repair.
METHOD: From January 2007 to December 2009 consecutive patients requiring surgery for third-degree rectocele and symptoms of obstructed defaecation were recruited. Participants underwent dissection of the perineal body, rectum and vagina preliminary to a tissue fixation system, an operation which inserts a tensioned tape to repair the perineal body.
RESULTS: Thirty Caucasian female patients, mean age 61 (range 47-87) years, mean parity 2.6 (range 1-5), were included. Live dissection demonstrated that the perineal body was divided into two parts, joined by a stretched central part, anchored laterally by the deep transverse perineii muscle to the descending ramus of the pubic bone. The mean longitudinal length of the perineal body was 4.5 (3.5-5.5) cm, accounting for 50% of the posterior vaginal support.
CONCLUSION: In women with low rectocele, the perineal body appears to be divided into two parts, severely displaced behind the ischial tuberosities. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endovaginal ultrasonography; obstructed defaecation; perineal body; rectocele; transperineal ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23819818     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

1.  Perineorrhaphy quantitative assessment (Pe-QA).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Mayada Younis; Sushen Naidoo; Warwick Birrell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction.

Authors:  Abdul H Sultan; Ash Monga; Joseph Lee; Anton Emmanuel; Christine Norton; Giulio Santoro; Tracy Hull; Bary Berghmans; Stuart Brody; Bernard T Haylen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Anatomy and surgical cure of descending perineal syndrome.

Authors:  Peter Petros
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The anthropometric definition of the rectum is highly variable.

Authors:  Molly A Wasserman; Michael F McGee; Irene B Helenowski; Amy L Halverson; Anne-Marie Boller; Steven J Stryker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Clinical efficacy of integral theory-guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Yong-Li Cao; Yuan-Yao Zhang; Shou-Sen Shi; Wei-Wei Yang; Nan Zhao; Bing-Bing Lyu; Wen-Li Zhang; Dong Wei
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 6.  Surgical anatomy of the vaginal introitus.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Dzung Vu; Audris Wong
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.367

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.