Literature DB >> 23819730

Percutaneous cervical cordotomy for the management of pain from cancer: a prospective review of 45 cases.

Emma Bain1, Heino Hugel, Manohar Sharma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cervical cordotomy (PCC) is a well recognized but infrequently performed procedure for the relief of unilateral intractable pain from malignancy. There is a paucity of data regarding efficacy and safety of PCC.
OBJECTIVES: The study's objectives were to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of PCC in cancer pain.
DESIGN: The study was a prospective review of 45 cases undergoing PCC at a tertiary referral center over a three-year period. SETTINGS/
SUBJECTS: All patients were suffering from severe, refractory unilateral pain secondary to malignancy with poor pain relief or intolerable side effects of conventional analgesics including opioids and adjuvants. MEASUREMENTS: Variables recorded preprocedure, at 2 days, and at 28 days postprocedure were numerical rating scale for maximum and average pain, oral morphine equivalent dose, and global impression of change. Adverse events and survival postprocedure were recorded.
RESULTS: Prospective data was obtained in 45 patients. Survival postprocedure ranged from 7 days to 33 months. There was a significant reduction from baseline in pain scores at 2 days and at 28 days postprocedure. Thirty-two patients experienced significant pain relief--average numerical rating scale (NRS) of zero--on day 2. Improvement in pain scores was sustained at 28 days. There were no serious adverse events observed such as respiratory failure.
CONCLUSIONS: PCC is a safe and highly effective procedure to treat intractable unilateral cancer pain. It offers significant advantages over other pain control methods. Patient selection and attention to detail is paramount for a successful outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23819730     DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  4 in total

1.  Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Neuroablative Procedures for Patients With Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Ahmed M Raslan; Sharona Ben-Haim; Steven M Falowski; André G Machado; Jonathan Miller; Julie G Pilitsis; William S Rosenberg; Joshua M Rosenow; Jennifer Sweet; Ashwin Viswanathan; Christopher J Winfree; Jason M Schwalb
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain.

Authors:  Mansoor M Aman; Ammar Mahmoud; Timothy Deer; Dawood Sayed; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Shane E Brogan; Vinita Singh; Amitabh Gulati; Natalie Strand; Jacqueline Weisbein; Johnathan H Goree; Fangfang Xing; Ali Valimahomed; Daniel J Pak; Antonios El Helou; Priyanka Ghosh; Krishna Shah; Vishal Patel; Alexander Escobar; Keith Schmidt; Jay Shah; Vishal Varshney; William Rosenberg; Sanjeet Narang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Spinal signalling of C-fiber mediated pleasant touch in humans.

Authors:  Andrew G Marshall; Manohar L Sharma; Kate Marley; Hakan Olausson; Francis P McGlone
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Percutaneous cervical cordotomy for cancer-related pain: national data.

Authors:  Marlise Poolman; Matthew Makin; Jess Briggs; Kate Scofield; Nick Campkin; Michael Williams; Manohar Lal Sharma; Barry Laird; Catriona R Mayland
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.568

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.