| Literature DB >> 23819639 |
Kun Dou1, Qingzhu Xu, Xiaolu Han.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous epidemiological studies have been conducted to explore the association between the Lys939Gln polymorphism of Xeroderma pigmentosum group C (XPC) gene and urinary bladder cancer susceptibility. However, the results remain inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of this relationship, a large and update meta-analysis was performed in this study.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23819639 PMCID: PMC3744163 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Main characteristics of these studies on the associations between XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and bladder cancer risk
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanyal et al. | 2004 | Sweden | Caucasian | PB | PCR-RFLP | 309 | 246 | 0.294 |
| Sak et al. | 2005 | England | Caucasian | HB | TaqMan | 532 | 561 | 0.191 |
| Garcia-Closas et al. | 2006 | Spain | Caucasian | HB | TaqMan | 1137 | 1138 | 0.470 |
| Wu et al. | 2006 | USA | Caucasian | HB | TaqMan | 606 | 596 | 0.744 |
| Zhu et al. | 2007 | USA | Caucasian | HB | Taqman | 550 | 554 | 0.668 |
| Fontana et al. | 2008 | French | Caucasian | HB | TaqMan | 51 | 45 | 0.456 |
| de Verdier et al. | 2010 | Sweden | Caucasian | PB | PCR-RFLP | 305 | 328 | 0.147 |
| Gangwar et al. | 2010 | India | Asian | HB | PCR-RFLP | 208 | 245 | 0.054 |
| Rouissi et al.1 | 2011 | Tunisia | African | HB | PCR-RFLP | 193 | 193 | 0.537 |
| Rouissi et al.2 | 2011 | Tunisia | African | HB | PCR-RFLP | 125 | 125 | 0.449 |
| Mittal et al. | 2012 | India | Asian | PB | PCR-RFLP | 212 | 250 | 0.073 |
| Liu et al. | 2012 | China | Asian | HB | PCR-RFLP | 600 | 609 | 0.824 |
PB Population-Based Study, HB Hospital-Based Study, P P value of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. PCR-RFLP Polymorphism Chain Reaction- Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism. 1,2 Different studies.
Main results of pooled odds ratios (ORs) with confidence interval (CI) in the meta-analysis
| Total | 9 | 1.352 (1.088 1.681) | 0.000 | 1.354 (1.085 1.688) | 0.001 | 1.017 (0.932 1.109) | 0.592 | 0.712 | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Caucasian | 3 | 1.240 (0.927 1.658) | 0.002 | 0.148 | 1.184 (0.913 1.536) | 0.006 | 0.203 | 1.041 (0.938 1.155) | 0.278 | 0.448 |
| African | 3 | 1.758 (1.097 2.819) | 0.373 | 1.800 (0.969 3.342) | 0.196 | 0.063 | 0.955 (0.680 1.341) | 0.575 | 0.791 | |
| Asian | 2 | 1.476 (1.110 1.962) | 0.554 | 1.586 (1.105 2.276) | 0.256 | 0.962 (0.802 1.154) | 0.655 | 0.677 | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| HB | 5 | 1.225 (0.967 1.551) | 0.009 | 0.093 | 1.233 (0.969 1.570) | 0.88 | 0.088 | 1.017 (0.924 1.120) | 0.382 | 0.728 |
| PB | 3 | 1.854 (1.338 2.569) | 0.958 | 1.806 (1.310 2.491) | 0.896 | 1.013 (0.823 1.247) | 0.678 | 0.900 | ||
| | | |||||||||
| Total | 9 | 0.945 (0.867 1.029) | 0.397 | 0.194 | 1.362 (1.099 1.688) | 0.18 | 0.18 | 1.109 (1.013 1.214) | 0.019 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Caucasian | 3 | 0.940 (0.814 1.085) | 0.086 | 0.397 | 1.219 (0.934 1.591) | 0.002 | 0.145 | 1.097 (0.960 1.254) | 0.003 | 0.175 |
| African | 3 | 0.890 (0.649 1.220) | 0.948 | 0.468 | 1.781 (1.057 3.002) | 0.241 | 1.258 (1.001 1.579) | 0.546 | 0.049 | |
| Asian | 2 | 0.954 (0.803 1.133) | 0.846 | 0.590 | 1.489 (1.130 1.962) | 0.357 | 1.123 (0.989 1.275) | 0.996 | 0.073 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| HB | 5 | 0.962 (0.865 1.070) | 0.264 | 0.480 | 1.239 (0.982 1.563) | 0.003 | 0.071 | 1.078 (0.971 1.197) | 0.021 | 0.160 |
| PB | 3 | 0.874 (0.718 1.065) | 0.655 | 0.183 | 1.824 (1.343 2.477) | 0.956 | 1.233 (1.067 1.423) | 0.749 | ||
OR Odds Ratio, CL Confidence Interval, P P value of heterogeneity.
Figure 1Forest plots for XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and risk of bladder cancer in overall populations (homozygous model for Gln/Gln vs Lys/Lys).
Figure 2Forest plots for XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and risk of bladder cancer in overall populations (heterozygous model for Gln/Gln vs Gln/Lys).
Figure 3Forest plots for XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism and risk of bladder cancer in overall populations (allele comparison for Gln allele vs. Lys allele).
Figure 4Begg’s funnel plot for assessing the publication bias under the allele contrast model (allele comparison for Gln allele vs. Lys allele).