| Literature DB >> 23819102 |
Korakot Nganvongpanit1, Terdsak Yano.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to report on the prevalence of swimming puppy syndrome (SPS) and investigate predisposing factors. Data were recorded from 2,443 puppies (1,183 males and 1,260 females) in Thailand, October 2006-September 2012, including breed, sex, number of puppies per litter, type of nest floor, number of affected limbs, and occurrence of pectus excavatum. Fifty-two puppies (2.13%) were diagnosed with SPS. The breed most frequently affected was English Bulldog (8.33%). There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between presence and absence of disease based on sex, breed, and nest floor type. The number of puppies per litter was associated with SPS; puppies from smaller litters (1.92 ± 1.12) had a higher prevalence of the disease (P < 0.01) than puppies from larger litters (3.64 ± 2.24). Moreover, 15.38% of puppies with affected limbs showed signs of pectus excavatum (8/52); this clinical sign was more prevalent (P < 0.01) in puppies with all four limbs affected with SPS.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23819102 PMCID: PMC3681226 DOI: 10.1155/2013/617803
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Number of puppies in each breed included in the study.
| Breed | Total | Male | Female | Number of litters | Number of puppies/litter (mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small breed (<10 kg) | |||||
| Chihuahua | 256 | 125 | 131 | 111 | 2 ± 1 |
| Dachshund | 18 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 4 ± 2 |
| Jack Russell Terrier* | 19 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 3 ± 1 |
| Pekingese | 58 | 27 | 31 | 22 | 3 ± 1 |
| Pomeranian | 293 | 131 | 162 | 130 | 2 ± 1 |
| Poodle | 82 | 45 | 37 | 26 | 3 ± 1 |
| Pug | 77 | 31 | 46 | 23 | 3 ± 1 |
| Shih Tzu | 265 | 123 | 142 | 76 | 3 ± 1 |
| Yorkshire Terrier | 165 | 74 | 91 | 79 | 2 ± 1 |
| Medium breed (10–25 kg) | |||||
| Beagle* | 60 | 36 | 24 | 13 | 5 ± 2 |
| Bulldog (English) | 48 | 25 | 23 | 14 | 3 ± 2 |
| French Bulldog | 53 | 23 | 30 | 14 | 4 ± 1 |
| Crossbreed | 122 | 48 | 74 | 21 | 6 ± 4 |
| Shetland Sheepdog* | 11 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 6 ± 1 |
| Thai Bangkaew | 85 | 49 | 36 | 13 | 7 ± 2 |
| Thai Ridgeback* | 13 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 7 ± 2 |
| Large breed (25–40 kg) | |||||
| American Pit Bull Terrier* | 71 | 32 | 39 | 9 | 8 ± 2 |
| German Shepherd* | 76 | 42 | 34 | 11 | 7 ± 2 |
| Golden Retriever | 217 | 103 | 114 | 36 | 6 ± 3 |
| Labrador Retriever | 213 | 115 | 98 | 36 | 6 ± 2 |
| Rottweiler* | 109 | 48 | 61 | 16 | 7 ± 3 |
| Siberian Husky | 132 | 73 | 59 | 28 | 5 ± 2 |
|
| |||||
| Total | 2,443 | 1,183 | 1,260 | = | — |
*Breed was not affected with swimming puppy syndrome.
Figure 1Geographic distribution of cases and clinics/hospitals included in the study in Thai.
Number of puppies in different breeds affected with swimming puppy syndrome.
| Healthy puppies | Swimming puppy syndrome | %** | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | Male | Female | Total (%*) | ||
| Small breed (<10 kg) | |||||||
| Chihuahua | 125 | 131 | 256 | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.78) | 3.85 |
| Dachshund | 8 | 10 | 18 | 1 | — | 1 (5.55) | 1.92 |
| Pekingese | 27 | 31 | 58 | 1 | 3 | 4 (6.89) | 7.69 |
| Pomeranian | 131 | 162 | 293 | 1 | 1 | 2 (0.68) | 3.85 |
| Poodle | 45 | 37 | 82 | 2 | 1 | 3 (3.65) | 5.77 |
| Pug | 31 | 46 | 77 | — | 2 | 2 (2.59) | 3.85 |
| Shih Tzu | 123 | 142 | 265 | 1 | 2 | 3 (1.17) | 5.77 |
| Yorkshire Terrier | 74 | 91 | 165 | 1 | 1 | 2 (1.21) | 3.85 |
| Medium breed (10–25 kg) | |||||||
| Bulldog (English) | 25 | 23 | 48 | 2 | 2 | 4 (8.33) | 7.69 |
| French Bulldog | 23 | 30 | 53 | 1 | 3 | 4 (7.54) | 7.69 |
| Crossbreed | 48 | 74 | 122 | 3 | — | 3 (2.45) | 5.77 |
| Thai Bangkaew | 49 | 36 | 85 | 2 | 1 | 2 (2.35) | 3.85 |
| Large breed (25–40 kg) | |||||||
| Golden Retriever | 103 | 114 | 217 | 6 | 2 | 8 (3.68) | 15.38 |
| Labrador Retriever | 115 | 98 | 213 | 3 | 2 | 5 (2.34) | 9.62 |
| Siberian Husky | 73 | 59 | 132 | 4 | 3 | 7 (5.30) | 13.46 |
|
| |||||||
| Total | 1,000 | 1,084 | 2,084 | 29 | 23 | 52 | 100 |
*Percentage of affected puppies compared within breeds.
**Percentage of affected puppies compared between breeds.
Factor of sex on expression of disease.
| Sex | Total | Disease present (cases) | Disease absent (controls) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 1,184 | 29 (2.45%) | 1,155 (97.55%) |
| Female | 1,259 | 23 (1.83%) | 1,236 (98.17%) |
Pearson's chi-squared statistic (includes Yates' continuity correction) = 0.423; P value using Fisher's exact test (1 degree of freedom) = 0.484; estimate of odds ratio = 1.248; 95% confidence limits for true odds ratio = [0.72, 2.166]; estimate of risk difference (p 1 − p 2) in case-control studies = 0.055; 95% confidence limits for risk difference = [0.006, 0.105].
Number of puppies per litter with presence or absence of disease.
| Data | Disease present (cases) | Disease absent (controls) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of samples | 52 | 641 |
| Mean number of puppies per litter | 1.92 | 3.65 |
| Standard deviation | 1.12 | 2.24 |
t = 9.6906; degrees of freedom = 88.859; P < 0.001.
Number of puppies per litter in normal and affected groups.
| Breed | Number of puppies per litter |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disease absent | Disease present | ||
| Small breed | |||
| Chihuahua | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 0 | 0.000 |
| Dachshund | 4 ± 2 | — | — |
| Jack Russell | 3 ± 1 | — | — |
| Pekingese | 3 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | 0.001 |
| Pomeranian | 2 ± 1 | 2 ± 0 | 0.001 |
| Poodle | 3 ± 1 | 1 ± 0 | 0.000 |
| Pug | 3 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 0.001 |
| Shih Tzu | 3 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | 0.006 |
| Yorkshire | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 0 | 0.000 |
| Mean ± SD |
|
| |
| Medium breed | |||
| Beagle | 5 ± 4 | — | — |
| Bulldog | 3 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 0.002 |
| French Bulldog | 4 ± 1 | 2 ± 1 | 0.008 |
| Crossbreed | 6 ± 4 | 1 ± 1 | 0.000 |
| Shetland | 6 ± 1 | — | — |
| Thai Bangkaew | 7 ± 2 | 4 ± 1 | 0.005 |
| Thai Ridgeback | 7 ± 2 | — | — |
| Mean ± SD |
|
| |
| Large breed | |||
| American pit | 8 ± 2 | — | — |
| German | 7 ± 2 | — | — |
| Golden | 6 ± 3 | 2 ± 1 | 0.000 |
| Labrador | 6 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | 0.000 |
| Rottweiler | 7 ± 3 | — | — |
| Siberian Husky | 5 ± 2 | 3 ± 2 | 0.011 |
| Mean ± SD |
|
| |
Number of litters on different floor types.
| Floor type | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tile | Concrete | Wood | ||
| Disease present (cases) | 29 (2.25%) | 15 (2.64%) | 8 (1.28%) | 52 |
| Disease absent (controls) | 1,261 (97.75%) | 554 (97.36%) | 617 (98.72%) | 2,432 |
|
| ||||
| Total | 1,290 | 569 | 625 | 2,484 |
Chi squared = 2.9861; degrees of freedom = 2; P value = 0.2247.
Relationship between affected limb and occurrence of pectus excavatum.
| Affected limb | Pectus excavatum | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Absent | ||
| Forelimb | 1 (20%) | 4 (80%) | 5 |
| All limbs | 7 (87.5%) | 1 (12.5%) | 8 |
| Hindlimb | — | 39 (100%) | 39 |
|
| |||
| Total | 8 (15.38%) | 44 (84.62%) | 52 |
P < 0.001.