Literature DB >> 23818949

Genetic diversity and molecular evolution of Chinese waxy maize germplasm.

Hongjian Zheng1, Hui Wang, Hua Yang, Jinhong Wu, Biao Shi, Run Cai, Yunbi Xu, Aizhong Wu, Lijun Luo.   

Abstract

Waxy maize (Zea mays L. var. certaina Kulesh), with many excellent characters in terms of starch composition and economic value, has grown in China for a long history and its production has increased dramatically in recent decades. However, the evolution and origin of waxy maize still remains unclear. We studied the genetic diversity of Chinese waxy maize including typical landraces and inbred lines by SSR analysis and the results showed a wide genetic diversity in the Chinese waxy maize germplasm. We analyzed the origin and evolution of waxy maize by sequencing 108 samples, and downloading 52 sequences from GenBank for the waxy locus in a number of accessions from genus Zea. A sharp reduction of nucleotide diversity and significant neutrality tests (Tajima's D and Fu and Li's F*) were observed at the waxy locus in Chinese waxy maize but not in nonglutinous maize. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that Chinese waxy maize originated from the cultivated flint maize and most of the modern waxy maize inbred lines showed a distinct independent origin and evolution process compared with the germplasm from Southwest China. The results indicated that an agronomic trait can be quickly improved to meet production demand by selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23818949      PMCID: PMC3688585          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Waxy maize (Zea mays L. var. certain Kulesh) is a special cultivated type of maize, and was first discovered in China in 1908 and then in other Asian countries [1]–[4]. Waxy maize, with nearly 100% amylopectin in endosperm, is mainly used as food in Asia, and is also an important raw material for food industries, textiles, paper-making and feedstuff worldwide because of its excellent characters in terms of starch composition and economic value [5]. Despite waxy maize was first discovered in China, the origin and evolution of waxy maize is still an enigma [6]–[11]. There are abundant waxy maize landraces in China, most of which distribute in Southwestern China, particularly in Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi [5], [7]. Yunnan is an original area of many important plant species with high genetic diversity. Several studies have suggested that Chinese waxy maize originated from Yunnan and Guangxi according to morphology, karotype, isozymes and DNA markers [3], [10], [12]–[14]. There is a wide genetic diversity of waxy maize in agronomic traits such as plant height, maturity, economic characters, resistance to insects and diseases and yield components in those regions [5]. With simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers, comparative analysis of genetic diversity in landraces of waxy maize from Yunnan and Guizhou concluded that both Yunnan and Guizhou would be the center of diversity and origin for waxy maize [10]. According to plant morphology, geographical distribution and biological characters, combined with historical data and folklore, waxy maize was considered to be derived from one single gene mutant from flint corn [5]. However, in 1970, a landrace (termed Four-row Wax due to only four rows of seed set in the cob) was collected from Menghai County, Yunnan Province, which has been planted by the local Dai minority since 1890 and is a primitive cultivar with many characters similar to that of wild species [3], [15]. The C-band pattern and karyotype of waxy maize were similar to popcorn, and the latter was considered as the oldest type of maize [16]. In the isozyme patterns of malic dehydrogenase, Chinese waxy maize has six bands as the same as that of Coix, suggesting that the origin of waxy maize might be related to Coix [6]. All these studies have made the origin and evolution of waxy maize more mysterious. The glutinous phenotype in maize has been shown to be resulted from a dramatic reduction in synthesis of amylose because of mutations or insertions in the waxy gene, which locates on the short arm of chromosome 9 and encodes a granule-bound starch synthase in maize [11], [17]–[18]. The DNA sequence of the wild type waxy locus was determined in 1980s in maize and is composed of 14 exons (Fig. 1) [18]. Recently, waxy sequences have been determined in a number of accessions from Zea lineage [4], [19]–[22].
Figure 1

Gene structure of waxy gene in maize (

http://www.maizesequence.org/Zea_mays/GRMZM2G024993_T01 ). Boxes represent exons. Lines between exons represent introns. The region between the two arrows is the fragment used in this study.

Gene structure of waxy gene in maize (

http://www.maizesequence.org/Zea_mays/GRMZM2G024993_T01 ). Boxes represent exons. Lines between exons represent introns. The region between the two arrows is the fragment used in this study. In maize, several genes such as ae1, tb1 and Y1 have been shown to be under strong selection. In rice, the origin of glutinous rice is associated with reduced genetic variation [23], and a selective sweep of about 250 kb in the waxy genomic region was observed [24]. However, there were several contrary reports on selection of waxy gene in maize [11], [20]–[22]. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether a same strong selection in waxy genomic region has happened under domestication in Chinese waxy maize. With the development of molecular systematics, comparison of DNA sequence variation between closely related species has provided insight into the amount of divergence between sibling species, and the ancestral population size of sibling species [25]. Tian et al determined the systematical position of waxy maize in genus Zea and confirmed the relationship among waxy maize, normal maize and progenitor of maize [22]. In recent decades, waxy maize production has increased dramatically especially in the developed areas in Southeast China. It was difficult for breeders to utilize the waxy maize landraces because of their undesirable agronomic traits. Many adapted waxy maize lines have been developed for hybrid production through different selection methods [26]. The unclear relationship between these elite waxy maize lines and old landraces makes the understanding of origin and evolution of waxy maize more complicated. In this study, we first used SSR markers to study the genetic diversity of Chinese waxy maize including landraces and inbred lines; we then sampled waxy sequences from 108 maize accessions including 89 waxy and 19 nonglutinous ones and compared with data of waxy sequences downloaded from GenBank to study the systematic position of Chinese waxy maize in genus Zea, and investigate the origin and dynamics of population evolution for Chinese waxy maize.

Materials and Methods

SSR Analyses

A set of 165 accessions of Chinese waxy maize including typical landraces and inbred lines were chosen at random and analyzed for the genetic diversity with SSR markers. DNA was extracted employing a modified CTAB procedure [27]. We used the set of 20 SSR markers downloaded from MaizeGDB (http://www.maizegdb.org), two from each chromosome (Table 1). PCR conditions and protocols were according to Bassam et al [28]. SSRs were multiplexed for a maximum efficiency. Fragments were separated using acrylamide gels run. The PIC for each marker was determined as described by Smith et al [29]. Allele identity was used for cluster analysis using NTSYS-pc Version 2.1 with UPGMA method to evaluate the genetic diversity [30].
Table 1

Chromosome locations of SSR primers and primer sequences.

No.Primer NameBinForward chainReverse chain
1bnlg4391.03 TTGACATCGCCATCTTGGTGACCA TCTTAATGCGATCGTACGAAGTTGTGGAA
2phi0111.09 TGTTGCTCGGTCACCATACC GCACACACACAGGACGACAGT
3bnlg3812.04 TCCCTCTTGAGTGTTTATCACAAA GTTTCCATGGGCAGGTGTAT
4umc15512.09 CACCGGAACACCTTCTTACAGTTT CGAAACCTTCTCGTGATGAGC
5umc21013.00 CCCGGCTAGAGCTATAAAGCAAGT CTAGCTAGTTTGGTGCGTGGTGAT
6bnlg1973.06 GCGAGAAGAAAGCGAGCAGA CGCCAAGAAGAAACACATCACA
7phi0724.01 ACCGTGCATGATTAATTTCTCCAGCCTT GACAGCGCGCAAATGGATTGAACT
8bnlg21624.08 GTCTGCTGCTAGTGGTGGTG CACCGGCATTCGATATCTTT
9umc17055.03 ATGCGTCTTTCACAAAGCATTACA AGGTGCAGTTCATAGACTTCCTGG
10umc11535.09 CAGCATCTATAGCTTGCTTGCATT TGGGTTTTGTTTGTTTGTTTGTTG
11phi1266.00 TCCTGCTTATTGCTTTCGTCAT GAGCTTGCATATTTCTTGTGGACA
12mmc02416.05 TATATCCGTGCATTTACGTTT CATCGCTTGTCTGTCGA
13phi1127.01 TGCCCTGCAGGTTCACATTGAGT AGGAGTACGCTTGGATGCTCTTC
14phi3281757.04 GGGAAGTGCTCCTTGCAG CGGTAGGTGAACGCGGTA
15bnlg21818.00 CCAATTCACCAATCATGCAA TTGGGGTGAAGCAATGTGTA
16phi0808.08 CACCCGATGCAACTTGCGTAGA TCGTCACGTTCCACGACATCAC
17bnlg2449.02 GATGCTACTACTGGTCTAGTCCAGA CTCCTCCACTCATCAGCCTTGA
18umc12779.08 TTTGAGAACGGAAGCAAGTACTCC ACCAACCAACCACTCCCTTTTTAG
19umc138010.00 CTGCTGATGTCTGGAAGAACCCT AGCATCATGCCAGCAGGTTTT
20umc119610.07 CGTGCTACTACTGCTACAAAGCGA AGTCGTTCGTGTCTTCCGAAACT

Amylopectin Content Determination

Amylopectin content was determined according to the National Standards of the People’s Republic of China, GB 7648–87 (China Standard Press 1987).

DNA Sequences for Waxy Gene

Eighty-nine diverse accessions of Chinese waxy maize, 16 accessions of flint maize and 3 accessions of sweet maize, including landraces and inbred lines, were selected for amplification and determination of the sequences of the waxy genes (Table 2). The landraces were mainly collected from Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi, where Chinese waxy maize was believed to originate. The inbred lines were mainly collected from Shandong, Beijing, Shanghai and Zhejiang where waxy maize production has increased quickly in recent decades. Accessions were sequenced at waxy locus. Primers for two overlapping regions for exon 8–12 (P-F1: 5′ GATTTCATCGACGGGTCTGT -3′ and P-R1: 5′- TCTGTCCCTCTCGTCAGGAT -3′) and exon 11–14 (P-F2: 5′- ATCCTGACGAGAGGGACAGA -3′ and P-R2: 5′- CACCGAACAGCAGGGATTAT -3′) were designed based on conserved regions of the B73 genomic sequence (AF488416). All primers were designed using Primer3 [31]. PCR products were purified with glass milk kit (BioDev Company, China) and were sequenced on both strands using an Applied Biosystems 3730 sequencer with the forward and reverse primers. The alignments were done with DNASTAR (DNASTAR Inc., 2001) and checked manually.
Table 2

Summary of accessions sampled forWaxy gene analysis.

Population/taxonSample nameTypeOriginSequence or GenBank no.Seed source or Reference
Waxy maize from Southwest ChinaBanqiaohuangnuoLRGuizhou, ChinaCWM050CAAS
ChaoyangbainuoLRGuizhou, ChinaCWM052CAAS
DiannuobaoguLRYunnan, ChinaCWM056CAAS
BainuoyumiLRYunnan, ChinaCWM057CAAS
HuangnuobaoguLRYunnan, ChinaCWM069CAAS
BendinuobaoguLRYunnan, ChinaCWM074CAAS
NuobaoguLRShanxi, ChinaCWM080CAAS
LiuchengnuoLRGuangxi, ChinaDQ369863Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
DalinuoyumiLRGuangxi, ChinaDQ369864Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
LaonuoLRGuangxi, ChinaDQ369865Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
WunonglaonuoLRGuangxi, ChinaDQ369866Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
ZaibainuoLRYunnan, ChinaDQ369886Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
PiantounuoLRYunnan, ChinaDQ369887Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
HuanuoyumiLRYunnan, ChinaDQ369888Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
LandihuanuoLRYunnan, ChinaDQ369891Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
ChangchongbainuoLRGuizhou, ChinaDQ369895Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
HuangyounuoLRGuizhou, ChinaDQ369897Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
JinhuangnuoLRGuizhou, ChinaDQ369899Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
XiaobainuoLRGuizhou, ChinaDQ369901Tian,M.L. et. al 2006
Waxy maize from East ChinaBaigengyumiLRShanghai, ChinaSWM011SAGC
HuangnuoyumiLRShanghai, ChinaSWM012SAGC
GengbaidayumiLRShanghai, ChinaSWM017SAGC
SWL089ILShandong, ChinaSWL089SAAS
SWL094ILShandong, ChinaSWL094SAAS
SWL097ILShandong, ChinaSWL097SAAS
SWL102ILShandong, ChinaSWL102SAAS
SWL105ILShandong, ChinaSWL105SAAS
SWL107ILShandong, ChinaSWL107SAAS
SWL108ILShandong, ChinaSWL108SAAS
SWL124ILShanghai,ChinaSWL124SAAS
SWL125ILShanghai,ChinaSWL125SAAS
SWL127ILShanghai,ChinaSWL127SAAS
SWL129ILShanghai,ChinaSWL129SAAS
SWL130ILShandong,ChinaSWL130SAAS
SWL131ILShandong,ChinaSWL131SAAS
SWL132ILGuangdong, ChinaSWL132SAAS
SWL135ILShandong, ChinaSWL135SAAS
SWL138ILShandong, ChinaSWL138SAAS
SWL155ILShanghai, ChinaSWL155SAAS
SWL161ILShandhai, ChinaSWL161SAAS
SWL162ILShandong, ChinaSWL162SAAS
SWL165ILBeijing, ChinaSWL165SAAS
SWL166ILJiangsu, ChinaSWL166SAAS
SWL169ILGuizhou, ChinaSWL169SAAS
SWL170ILGuizhou, ChinaSWL170SAAS
SWL171ILGuizhou, ChinaSWL171SAAS
Waxy maize from East ChinaSWL172ILShanghai, ChinaSWL172SAAS
SWL174ILShanghai, ChinaSWL174SAAS
SWL175ILShanghai, ChinaSWL175SAAS
SWL176ILShandong, ChinaSWL176SAAS
SWL177ILShandong, ChinaSWL177SAAS
SWL178ILShandong, ChinaSWL178SAAS
SWL179ILShandong, ChinaSWL179SAAS
SWL180ILShandong, ChinaSWL180SAAS
SWL182ILHubei, ChinaSWL182SAAS
SWL183ILShandong, ChinaSWL183SAAS
SWL190ILShanghai, ChinaSWL190SAAS
SWL191ILShanghai, ChinaSWL191SAAS
SWL193ILShanghai, ChinaSWL193SAAS
SWL194ILShanghai, ChinaSWL194SAAS
SWL196ILShanghai, ChinaSWL196SAAS
SWL197ILShandong, ChinaSWL197SAAS
SWL198ILShanghai, ChinaSWL198SAAS
SWL200ILShanghai, ChinaSWL200SAAS
SWL201ILShanghai, ChinaSWL201SAAS
SWL202ILShanghai, ChinaSWL202SAAS
SWL231ILShanghai, ChinaSWL231SAAS
SWL258ILShanghai, ChinaSWL258SAAS
SWL269ILShanghai, ChinaSWL269SAAS
SWL271ILShanghai, ChinaSWL271SAAS
SWL273ILShanghai, ChinaSWL273SAAS
SWL276ILBeijing, ChinaSWL276SAAS
SWL277ILBeijing, ChinaSWL277SAAS
SWL278ILJiangsu, ChinaSWL278SAAS
SWL283ILShanghai, ChinaSWL283SAAS
SWL284ILShanghai, ChinaSWL284SAAS
SWL285ILShanghai, ChinaSWL285SAAS
SWL286ILShanghai, ChinaSWL286SAAS
SWL287ILShanghai, ChinaSWL287SAAS
SWL290ILShanghai, ChinaSWL290SAAS
SWL294ILShanghai, ChinaSWL294SAAS
SWL310ILShanghai, ChinaSWL310SAAS
SWL312ILShanghai, ChinaSWL312SAAS
SWL324ILShanghai, ChinaSWL324SAAS
SWL326ILShanghai, ChinaSWL326SAAS
SWL328ILShanghai, ChinaSWL328SAAS
SWL329ILShanghai, ChinaSWL329SAAS
SWL333ILShanghai, ChinaSWL333SAAS
SWL335ILShanghai, ChinaSWL335SAAS
SWL337ILShanghai, ChinaSWL337SAAS
SWL339ILShanghai, ChinaSWL339SAAS
SWL343ILShanghai, ChinaSWL343SAAS
SWL345ILShanghai, ChinaSWL345SAAS
SWL348ILShanghai, ChinaSWL348SAAS
Waxy maize from East ChinaSWL359ILJiangsu, ChinaSWL359SAAS
SWL362ILShanghai, ChinaSWL362SAAS
SWL370ILShanghai, ChinaSWL370SAAS
SWL371ILShanghai, ChinaSWL371SAAS
SWL378ILShanghai, ChinaSWL378SAAS
SWL385ILShanghai, ChinaSWL385SAAS
SWL386ILShanghai, ChinaSWL386SAAS
Waxy maize from America915BILArgentinaEU747862Zhao,Y. et al 2008
923AILArgentinaEU747863Zhao,Y. et al 2008
Flint maize from ChinaLaorenyaLRShanghai, ChinaSMV002SAGC
ZiyuyaLRShanghai, ChinaSMV003SAGC
JinmeihuangLRShanghai, ChinaSMV004SAGC
MatuanLRShanghai, ChinaSMV005SAGC
ZaobaiLRShanghai, ChinaSMV006SAGC
XiaojinhuangLRShanghai, ChinaSMV015SAGC
HuangnuoLRGuizhou, ChinaCMV054CAAS
BainuoyumaiLRYunnan, ChinaCMV065CAAS
HeinuobaoguLRYunnan, ChinaCMV075CAAS
SML090ILShandong, ChinaSML090SAAS
SML136ILShandong, ChinaSML136SAAS
SML137ILShandong, ChinaSML137SAAS
SML173ILJiangsu, ChinaSML173SAAS
SML280ILShanghai, ChinaSML280SAAS
SML306ILShanghai, ChinaSML306SAAS
SML383ILShangdong, ChinaSML383SAAS
Sweet maize from ChinaSHL391ILZhejiang, ChinaSHL391SAAS
SHL403ILZhejiang, ChinaSHL403SAAS
SHL408ILZhejiang, ChinaSHL408SAAS
Flint maze from AmericaEP1ILAmericaAF544080Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
Mo17ILAmericaAF544090Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
M162WILAmericaAF544089Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
Oh43ILAmericaAF544094Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
Ki21ILAmericaAF544087Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
P39ILAmericaAF544095Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
IL101ILAmericaAF544085Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
A6ILAmericaAF544069Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
B37ILAmericaAF544072Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
Pa91ILAmericaAF544096Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
Tx601ILAmericaAF544098Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
NC348ILAmericaAF544093Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
CML254ILAmericaAF544076Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
T232ILAmericaAF544097Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
Ky21ILAmericaAF544088Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
B97ILAmericaAF544074Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
CI187ILAmericaAF544075Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
CML333ILAmericaAF544078Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
W153RILAmericaAF544099Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
I205ILAmericaAF544083Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
B14AILAmericaAF544071Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
N28HtILAmericaAF544091Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
NC260ILAmericaAF544092Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
IDS28ILAmericaAF544084Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
a2132ILAmericaAF544082Whitt,S.R., et al. 2002
Zea mays ssp.PI566683LRAmericamAF292525Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
Mexicana PI566691LRAmericamAF292530Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI566685LRAmericamAF292524Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI566673LRAmericamAF292528Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI566682LRAmericamAF292526Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
-LRAmericamAF079260Mason-Gamer, 1998
Zea mays ssp.PI331786LRAmericapAF292518Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
Parviglumis M106LRAmericapAF292523Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI331785LRAmericapAF292517Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI384061LRAmericapAF292520Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI331783LRAmericapAF292516Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI384062LRAmericapAF292521Gaut,B.S. et al 2000
PI331787LRAmericapAF292519Gaut,B.S. et al 2000

LR: Landrace; IL: Inbred line; CAAS: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; SAGC: Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center; SAAS: Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

LR: Landrace; IL: Inbred line; CAAS: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; SAGC: Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center; SAAS: Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Genetic diversity at waxy gene locus from a wide range of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and its wild relatives (Z. mays ssp. mexicana, hereafter mexicana, and Z. mays ssp parviglumis, hereafter parviglumis) had been investigated in previous studies [20], [32]–[35], and their sequences were downloaded from GenBank (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) as comparison in this study. The sampled accessions were classified into eight populations according to their endosperm texture, geographical origins or taxa (Table 2).

Sequence Variation Analysis for Waxy Gene

Sequence analysis was performed, in part, with the program DNASP version 5.10.01 [36], [37]. The average pairwise nucleotide diversity π and Watterson’s estimator of θ, an estimate of 4N, where N is the effective population size and μ is the mutation rate per nucleotide, were calculated for genetic diversity [38], [39]. The Tajima’s D and Li & Fu’s D* and F* were tested for deviation from the neutral equilibrium model of evolution using the tests of Tajima, and Fu and Li [40], [41]. Recombination rates were estimated with the methods developed by Hudson et al and Hey et al [42], [43].

Phylogenetic Reconstruction

Neighbour-joining (NJ) phylogenies based on the Kimura 2-parameter distance matrix were generated by MEGA version 4.0 to reconstruct the gene tree using waxy gene data [44]. One thousand bootstrap replicates were used to assess confidence in the phylogeny.

Results

Genetic Analyses of Chinese Waxy Maize

We chose 165 accessions of Chinese waxy maize including landraces and inbred lines and analyzed for the genetic diversity with SSR markers. A total of 104 alleles were found at the 20 SSR loci, with a range of 2 to 8 alleles per marker. The average alleles per marker across genotypes were 5.2, which were higher than that (3.7) reported by Wu et al using 16 waxy maize landraces and 61 SSR markers [9]. The PIC values for the 20 SSR loci ranged from 0.41 to 0.84, with an average of 0.70. This is consistent with the results of Xue et al., who reported an average PIC value of 0.64 for 184 maize inbred lines including 111 common and 73 waxy inbreds [45]. The average PIC value in combination with the high number of alleles indicates presence of a wide genetic diversity in the Chinese waxy maize germplasm used in this study. Cluster analysis of 165 waxy maize lines was conducted based on genetic similarities from SSR data with UPGMA method. UPGMA analysis grouped the 165 lines into groups A, B and C (Fig. 2), which was generally consistent with their known pedigree information and breeder’s experience. The landraces collected from Southwest China such as Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi, and some of inbred lines collected from Northern China formed one group (group A), of which the Southwest Chinese waxy maize land races formed a subgroup. Most of the inbred lines collected from Yangtse River delta including Shanghai and Zhejiang formed one group (group B). Most of the inbred lines collected from North and East China including Shandong, Henan and Beijing formed the group C. The results indicated that most of the modern waxy inbred lines seemed to have little relationship with the Southwest Chinese waxy maize landraces, which were regarded as the origin of Chinese waxy maize [3], [12]–[14]. It would be very helpful to choose the most genetically distant lines for waxy maize genetic study and hybridization breeding based on grouping of waxy maize germplasm.
Figure 2

Dendrogram for 165 maize accessions based on a cluster analysis of genetic similarities from SSR data.

DNA Sequence Variation and Test for Deviation from Neutrality

We examined DNA sequence variation in about 1,750 bp region of waxy gene in 89 Chinese waxy, 16 flint and 3 sweet maize accessions, of which 72 nucleotides were variable (Table 3). High amylopectin content (>95%) was observed in the 89 Chinese waxy accessions (Table S1). Waxy sequence data for 52 accessions from maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and its wild relatives (mexicana and parviglumis) were downloaded from GenBank and used as comparison in this study [20], [32]–[35]. Different accessions within each taxon or population showed an apparent difference in genetic variation at waxy locus (Table 3). Average pairwise nucleotide diversity, , in the nonglutinous maize was more than 3-fold higher than that in the waxy accessions. The waxy maize from East China, mainly being modern waxy maize inbred lines, contained the minimum level of variation among all sampled taxa or populations. The estimate of π for waxy maize from East China was 66.0%, 12.7%, 19.9%, 13.1%, 6.1% and 7.0% of that for waxy maize accessions from Southwest China, flint maize from China, sweet maize from China, flint maize from America, parviglumis and mexicana, respectively. Similarly, θ and were lower in the waxy maize compared to others samples. The reduction in genetic diversity at waxy locus in waxy maize suggested that Chinese waxy maize experienced a genetic bottleneck during its improvement, especially in modern waxy maize breeding.
Table 3

Summary of nucleotide diversity within maize taxon or population.

Taxon or Population N b Siteb S b H b π b θ b k b D D* F* Rm
Waxy maize from Southwest Chinaa 1917751260.001030.002601.357−2.20087** −2.97230*−3.18559*0
Waxy maize from East China8217912680.000680.002041.170−2.38092** −4.10102*−4.12647*0
Flint maize from China16179327110.005350.004729.2250.549690.867510.867516
Sweet maize from China31763940.003410.003416.000----
Flint maize from Americaa 25178823150.005210.006345.481−0.68060−0.92668−0.994145
parviglumis a 713883770.011060.0113914.667−0.16551−0.13036−0.152878
mexicana a 613732960.009740.0106712.400−0.54951−0.49755−0.556192

Some sequence data were from Mason et al (1998), Gaut et al (2000); Whitt et al. (2002), Tian et al. (2006), and Zhao et al. (2008).

n, number of samples; S : number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; H, haploid; Hd: haplotype (gene) diversity; π, The average pairwise nucleotide diversity (Tajima 1983); θ, an estimate of 4Neμ, where Ne is the effective population size and μ is the mutation rate per nucleotide (Watterson 1975); K, average number of nucleotide differences; D: Tajima’s D (1989); D*:Fu and Li’s D (1993); F*: Fu and Li’s F (1993); Rm: Minimum number of recombination events.

P<0.01; * P<0.05.

Some sequence data were from Mason et al (1998), Gaut et al (2000); Whitt et al. (2002), Tian et al. (2006), and Zhao et al. (2008). n, number of samples; S : number of polymorphic (segregating) sites; H, haploid; Hd: haplotype (gene) diversity; π, The average pairwise nucleotide diversity (Tajima 1983); θ, an estimate of 4Neμ, where Ne is the effective population size and μ is the mutation rate per nucleotide (Watterson 1975); K, average number of nucleotide differences; D: Tajima’s D (1989); D*:Fu and Li’s D (1993); F*: Fu and Li’s F (1993); Rm: Minimum number of recombination events. P<0.01; * P<0.05. The Tajima’s D and Li & Fu’s D* and F* were tested for deviation from the neutral equilibrium model of evolution based on Tajima, and Fu and Li [40], [41]. Estimates of D, D* and F* were different within each taxon or population (Table 3). All three tests identified a significantly negative selection on the waxy gene in both waxy subpopulations, but not in any nonglutinous subpopulation or taxon, which suggests that strong selection in improvement has acted on the locus in the Chinese waxy population. The negative selection in East Chinese waxy maize accessions, which mainly consist of modern waxy maize inbred lines, was stronger than that in Southwest Chinese waxy maize accessions, which are landraces. The significant neutral deviation at this locus in the waxy population compared to the nonglutinous population is consistent with the sharp reduction in polymorphism. We estimated the minimum number of recombination events (Rm) within the samples of waxy maize sequences (Table 3). The recombination events were 0, 0, 6, 5, 8 and 2 for the waxy maize from Southwest China, waxy maize from East China, Chinese flint maize, American flint, parviglumis and mexicana accessions. High-frequency recombination appears to somewhat increase the sequence diversity at waxy locus.

Phylogenetics for Chinese Waxy Maize Based on Sequence Polymorphisms

Based on the waxy sequences, we constructed a phylogenetic tree including Chinese waxy and other nonglutinous maize accessions by neighbor joint method (Fig. 3), which is helpful to elucidate their origins. The tree indicated that Chinese waxy maize were grouped two distinct independent branches, one mainly containing Southwest Chinese waxy maize and the other mainly East Chinese waxy maize. It suggests that the Chinese waxy maize should have two independent origins and evolution processes.
Figure 3

Phylogenetic tree of the Chinese waxy maize accessions based on waxy gene.

The waxy maize from Southwest China, East China and America are shown with red, green and purple circles, respectively. The sweet maize, flint maize from China and flint maize from America are shown with red, green and purple triangles, respectively. Wild maize Zea mays spp. parviglumis and Zea mays spp. mexicana are shown with red and green squares, respectively.

Phylogenetic tree of the Chinese waxy maize accessions based on waxy gene.

The waxy maize from Southwest China, East China and America are shown with red, green and purple circles, respectively. The sweet maize, flint maize from China and flint maize from America are shown with red, green and purple triangles, respectively. Wild maize Zea mays spp. parviglumis and Zea mays spp. mexicana are shown with red and green squares, respectively. One subset of waxy maize sequences forms one distinct branch except one Chinese flint maize sequence SML137. This group contains most of the waxy maize inbred lines from East China and three landraces Baigengyumi, Huangnuoyumi and Gengbaidayumi. The remaining waxy maize accessions, which contained all other Southwest Chinese waxy landraces and some East Chinese waxy accessions, were mixed with several Chinese flint and America flint accessions. Two American waxy maize accessions (915B and 923A) formed a distinct group mixed with some American flint maize, which was different from Chinese waxy maize. The intermixing is reasonable and essential if waxy maize might be domesticated from flint maize. Three wild maize accessions (parviglumis AF292516, and mexicana AF292525 and AF079260) formed a distinct branch which is basal to the flint and waxy maize groups. On the other hand, two different branches were formed with flint maize, which were basal to the two different Chinese waxy maize groups. The results suggest that flint maize maybe be the ancestor of waxy maize, and wild maize relatives parviglumis or mexicana maybe be the ancestor of flint maize. This suggestion was consistent with the low nucleotide diversity in waxy maize compared to flint maize, parviglumis and mexicana.

Discussion

Due to the special dietary habit for glutinous food in China, selection in maize has been made for waxy phenotype with high amylopectin since the maize was introduced into China from the new world about 400 years ago [3]. Although there are abundant waxy maize landraces in south China such as Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi, where were regarded as the origin of Chinese waxy maize [3], [12]–[14], they have seldom been used directly or indirectly in modern waxy maize breeding in recent decades [25]. Our study was a try to elucidate the relationship between modern waxy inbred lines and waxy maize landraces. The waxy mutants give rise to the waxy maize phenotype because the mutants hinder amylase synthesis leading to accumulate nearly 100% amylopectin in starch [25]. In our collection, high amylopectin content (>95%) was observed in the 89 Chinese waxy accessions sequenced by ourselves (Table S1). We tried to include the main typical landraces and inbred lines currently used for commercial production in China to reveal the genetic diversity of Chinese waxy maize in our study.

Genetic Diversity of Chinese Waxy Maize

Our SSR analysis have shown a wide genetic diversity in Chinese waxy maize accessions including landraces and inbred lines. It is also very interesting to find that the landraces collected from Southwest China formed a subgroup, indicating that most of the modern waxy inbred lines seemed to have little relationship with the Southwest Chinese landraces. A further study on DNA sequence variation at waxy locus for Chinese waxy maize and its wild relatives provided insight to the relationship between modern waxy inbred lines and waxy maize landraces, and information on the origin and dynamics of population evolution for Chinese waxy maize in genus Zea. It is commonly thought that crops are bereft of genetic variation compared to their wild relatives [46]. In our study, the Chinese waxy maize only contained 16.0%, 16.3%, 7.7% and 8.8% of sequence diversity in flint maize accessions from China, flint maize from America, parviglumis, and mexicana, respectively (Table 3). The decrease of genetic diversity at waxy locus was caused by only one possible reason that waxy gene experienced a genetic bottleneck and strong selection during its improvement, especially in modern waxy maize breeding, for waxy maize from Eastern China contained 66.0% of the sequence diversity in waxy maize from Southwest. Our test for deviation from neutrality revealed a significantly negative selection on the waxy gene in waxy maize, but not in normal maize and their wild relatives. On the other hand, the negative selection in Eastern Chinese waxy maize was stronger than that in Southwest Chinese waxy maize. The neutral test result is consistent with the sharp reduction in polymorphism at this locus in waxy maize compared to the normal maize and their wild relatives. The results suggest that strong selection in improvement has acted on the locus in the Chinese waxy maize.

Origin and Evolution of Chinese Waxy Maize

Resolving the issues related to the origin and evolution for a domesticated crop is a fascinating and challenging endeavor that requires the integration of botanical, archeological and genetic evidence [47]–[49]. Our data have provided us an explicit relationship among waxy maize, flint maize and the wild relatives for two reasons. First, in the phylogenetic tree, the sequences of Chinese waxy maize formed two groups which are mixed with several Chinese flint maize sequences, and two distinct branches formed with flint maize were basal to the two Chinese waxy maize groups. It showed that waxy maize undergoes the most recent divergence event from flint maize. Second, three wild maize accessions (parviglumis AF292516, and mexicana AF292525 and AF079260) formed a distinct branch which is basal to the flint and waxy maize groups. The results suggest that wild maize relatives parviglumis or mexicana maybe be the ancestor of flint maize. It seems difficult to explain the observation that the intermixture of two subspecies (parviglumis and mexicana) formed a basal branch in the phylogenetic tree, given that these two subspecies do not grow sympatrically [49], [50]–[52]. There are two possible explanations: (1) there is a long distance dispersal from parviglumis to mexicana populations; (2) the gene pools of the two subspecies were diverged too late to be fully differentiated. The first explanation seems unlikely but cannot be excluded. The second explanation seems more likely, given that the gene pools of mexicana, parviglumis and maize differ more in allele frequencies than by allele presence/absence. The result is consistent with the observation of Fukunaga et al [51]. Of course, this viewpoint needs to be supported by more molecular evidences. Tian et al concluded that Southwest China origin for waxy maize is consistent with local cultural practices [5]. In the past, only in Southwest China does waxy maize attain the importance of a staple crop. Ethnographic studies suggest that waxy maize cultivation is associated with upland agriculture in Southwest China. Indeed, Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi in Southwest China are referred to as “the genetic diversity centre” for waxy maize, reflecting the importance of waxy maize to the economy and culture of the area. In recent decades, waxy maize production has increased dramatically especially in the developed areas of Southeast China. Many waxy maize germplasm and new inbred lines have been developed for hybrid production through genetic improvement [26]. Our study suggests that most of the modern waxy maize germplasm showed a distinct, independent origin and evolution compared with the germplasm in Southwest China. The results indicate that an agronomic trait can be quickly improved to meet production demand by artificial selection. It is reasonable to speculate that production demand plays a critical role in crop genetic improvement and can speed the artificial selection and evolution at a target gene locus. gene structure of maize accessions sequenced by Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences. (DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  26 in total

1.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Matsuoka; Yves Vigouroux; Major M Goodman; Jesus Sanchez G; Edward Buckler; John Doebley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sequence diversity in the tetraploid Zea perennis and the closely related diploid Z. diploperennis: insights from four nuclear loci.

Authors:  P Tiffin; B S Gaut
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods.

Authors:  Julio Rozas; Juan C Sánchez-DelBarrio; Xavier Messeguer; Ricardo Rozas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Molecular evidence on the origin and evolution of glutinous rice.

Authors:  Kenneth M Olsen; Michael D Purugganan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic signals of origin, spread, and introgression in a large sample of maize landraces.

Authors:  Joost van Heerwaarden; John Doebley; William H Briggs; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Major M Goodman; Jose de Jesus Sanchez Gonzalez; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Genetic diversity and selection in the maize starch pathway.

Authors:  Sherry R Whitt; Larissa M Wilson; Maud I Tenaillon; Brandon S Gaut; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac and Ds.

Authors:  N Fedoroff; S Wessler; M Shure
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Population genetics of duplicated disease-defense genes, hm1 and hm2, in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.) and its wild ancestor (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis).

Authors:  Liqing Zhang; Andrew S Peek; Detiger Dunams; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  12 in total

1.  Microsatellite marker-based characterization of waxy maize inbreds for their utilization in hybrid breeding.

Authors:  Elangbam Lamalakshmi Devi; Firoz Hossain; Vignesh Muthusamy; Rashmi Chhabra; Rajkumar Uttamrao Zunjare; Aanchal Baveja; Sunil Kumar Jaiswal; Rajat Goswami; Sweta Dosad
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Genome-wide distribution comparative and composition analysis of the SSRs in Poaceae.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Chao Yang; Qiaojun Jin; Dongjie Zhou; Shuangshuang Wang; Yuanjie Yu; Long Yang
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Genetic diversity and population structure of Rheum tanguticum (Dahuang) in China.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Zhang; Ying Liu; Xuan Gu; Zhengzheng Guo; Li Li; Xiaona Song; Siqi Liu; Yimei Zang; Yanpeng Li; Chunsheng Liu; Shengli Wei
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.455

4.  Characterization of Genome-Wide Variation in Four-Row Wax, a Waxy Maize Landrace with a Reduced Kernel Row Phenotype.

Authors:  Hanmei Liu; Xuewen Wang; Bin Wei; Yongbin Wang; Yinghong Liu; Junjie Zhang; Yufeng Hu; Guowu Yu; Jian Li; Zhanbin Xu; Yubi Huang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Introgression of opaque2 into Waxy Maize Causes Extensive Biochemical and Proteomic Changes in Endosperm.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Zhou; Liya Song; Xiaoxing Zhang; Xinhai Li; Na Yan; Renpei Xia; Hui Zhu; Jianfeng Weng; Zhuanfang Hao; Degui Zhang; Hongjun Yong; Mingshun Li; Shihuang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Salt stress under the scalpel - dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance.

Authors:  Mitchell J L Morton; Mariam Awlia; Nadia Al-Tamimi; Stephanie Saade; Yveline Pailles; Sónia Negrão; Mark Tester
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 7.  Corn Starch: Quality and Quantity Improvement for Industrial Uses.

Authors:  Ju-Kyung Yu; Yong-Sun Moon
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28

8.  Identification of Genetic Differentiation between Waxy and Common Maize by SNP Genotyping.

Authors:  Derong Hao; Zhenliang Zhang; Yujing Cheng; Guoqing Chen; Huhua Lu; Yuxiang Mao; Mingliang Shi; Xiaolan Huang; Guangfei Zhou; Lin Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Development of Quality Control Genotyping Approaches: A Case Study Using Elite Maize Lines.

Authors:  Jiafa Chen; Cristian Zavala; Noemi Ortega; Cesar Petroli; Jorge Franco; Juan Burgueño; Denise E Costich; Sarah J Hearne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sequence polymorphism of the waxy gene in waxy maize accessions and characterization of a new waxy allele.

Authors:  Meijie Luo; Yaxing Shi; Yang Yang; Yanxin Zhao; Yunxia Zhang; Yamin Shi; Mengsi Kong; Chunhui Li; Zhen Feng; Yanli Fan; Li Xu; Shengli Xi; Baishan Lu; Jiuran Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.