| Literature DB >> 23818922 |
Hye-Kyung Choi1, Eun-Kyung Won, Young Pyo Jang, Se-Young Choung.
Abstract
The antiobesity effects of Codonopsis lanceolata (CL) were evaluated in a high-calorie/high-fat-diet (HFD-) induced obesity rat model and 3T3-L1 cells. The Sprague-Dawley male rats were fed a normal diet (ND) or a HFD for a period of 12 weeks. The rats were subdivided into groups: ND, ND + wild Codonopsis lanceolata (wCL) (900 mg/kg/day, p.o.), ND + cultivated Codonopsis lanceolata (cCL) (900 mg/kg/day, p.o.), HFD, HFD + wCL (100, 300, or 900 mg/kg/day, p.o.), HFD + cCL (100, 300, or 900 mg/kg/day, p.o.), and HFD + sibutramine. The body weight gains of the administered HFD + CL (wCL or CCL) were lower than those of the rats fed with only the HFD group. Moreover, the weight of adipose pads and the serum levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the group administered HDL + CL were significantly lower than in the HFD group. The inhibitory effect of lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells was measured by Oil Red O staining and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Treatment of 3T3-L1 cells with wCL inhibited lipid accumulation and expression of C/EBPα and PPARγ. These results suggest that CL has a great potential as a functional food with anti-obesity effects and as a therapeutic alternative in the treatment of obesity.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23818922 PMCID: PMC3683442 DOI: 10.1155/2013/210297
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Composition of the normal diet and the high-calorie/high-fat diet (g/100 g).
| Groups ingredient | Normal diet | High-calorie/high-fat diet* |
|---|---|---|
| Casein | 20.0 | 29.0 |
| Corn starch | 60.0 | 10.0 |
| Sucrose | — | 10.0 |
| Corn oil | 9.0 | 5.0 |
| Cellulose | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Lard | — | 35.0 |
| AIN-76 mineral mix | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| AIN-76 vitamin mix | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Choline bitartrate | 0.2 | 0.2 |
|
| ||
| kcal/100 g diet | 390.2 | 458.0 |
| Calorie from fat (%) | 11.5 | 35.0 |
*High-calorie/high-fat diet was modified from the AIN-76 dietary composition [21].
Classification of experimental groups.
| Group | Treatment |
|---|---|
| ND | Normal diet |
| ND + wCL 900 mg/kg | ND + wild |
| ND + cCL 900 mg/kg | ND + cultivated |
| HFD | High-calorie/high-fat diet |
| HFD + sibutramine | HFD + sibutramine 7.5, 11 mg/kg/day |
| HFD + wCL 100 mg/kg | HFD + wild |
| HFD + wCL 300 mg/kg | HFD + wild |
| HFD + wCL 900 mg/kg | HFD + wild |
| HFD + cCL 100 mg/kg | HFD + cultivated |
| HFD + cCL 300 mg/kg | HFD + cultivated |
| HFD + cCL 900 mg/kg | HFD + cultivated |
Figure 1HPLC chromatogram and total ion current chromatogram of the crude extract of wCL by LC-UV-ESI-MS.
Effects of water extracts of wild and cultivated Codonopsis lanceolata on body weight, food efficiency ratio, and food intake in SD rats fed with normal or high-fat diets.
| Group | Body weight (g) | Food efficiency ratio1 | Food intake (g/day) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | |||
| ND | 213.7 ± 10.11 | 481.60 ± 35.68## | 0.21 ± 0.03# | 57.24 ± 8.17# |
| ND + wCL 900 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 8.97 | 473.40 ± 26.38## | 0.17 ± 0.05∗## | 55.14 ± 10.06# |
| ND + cCL 900 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 8.11 | 484.20 ± 26.15## | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 57.47 ± 12.33# |
| HFD | 213.6 ± 7.89 | 546.80 ± 36.84** | 0.24 ± 0.05* | 71.46 ± 6.80* |
| HFD + Sibutramine | 213.6 ± 7.87 | 474.00 ± 30.20## | 0.14 ± 0.03∗∗## | 42.72 ± 6.56∗## |
| HFD + wCL 100 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 7.66 | 516.22 ± 32.73* | 0.21 ± 0.05# | 52.60 ± 5.42# |
| HFD + wCL 300 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 7.50 | 524.22 ± 58.10* | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 49.92 ± 11.57## |
| HFD + wCL 900 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 7.70 | 499.75 ± 30.32# | 0.17 ± 0.08∗## | 46.35 ± 10.68∗## |
| HFD + cCL 100 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 7.55 | 504.20 ± 31.20# | 0.26 ± 0.06* | 48.85 ± 4.38## |
| HFD + cCL 300 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 7.55 | 509.33 ± 36.86# | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 47.37 ± 6.50## |
| HFD + cCL 900 mg/kg | 213.6 ± 7.05 | 520.75 ± 22.52* | 0.17 ± 0.08∗## | 50.28 ± 9.09## |
1Food efficiency ratio (FER) = increased body weight (g)/Food intake (g).
Values are the means ± S.D. (n = 10), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus ND group, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 versus HFD group.
Effects of water extracts of wild and cultivated Codonopsis lanceolata on retroperitoneal, epididymal, brown fat, and total abdominal fat in SD rats fed with normal or high-fat diets.
| Group | Retroperitoneal (g) | Epididymal (g) | Brown fat (g) | Total abdominal (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ND | 6.21 ± 3.30## | 9.40 ± 4.00## | 0.43 ± 0.08 | 13.80 ± 4.05## |
| ND + wCL 900 mg/kg | 5.89 ± 1.69## | 9.76 ± 2.63## | 0.54 ± 0.16 | 14.50 ± 2.92## |
| ND + cCL 900 mg/kg | 6.24 ± 1.20## | 9.95 ± 3.36## | 0.52 ± 0.11 | 14.58 ± 3.09## |
| HFD | 11.01 ± 1.79** | 15.19 ± 2.57** | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 25.78 ± 3.67** |
| HFD + Sibutramine | 6.81 ± 1.54## | 11.16 ± 3.89# | 0.33 ± 0.07 | 18.60 ± 2.86∗# |
| HFD + wCL 100 mg/kg | 8.88 ± 1.20∗# | 15.77 ± 4.34** | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 23.26 ± 3.12** |
| HFD + wCL 300 mg/kg | 8.69 ± 0.83∗# | 13.42 ± 1.36* | 0.53 ± 0.12 | 21.94 ± 4.84** |
| HFD + wCL 900 mg/kg | 8.25 ± 1.69∗# | 12.67 ± 3.79∗# | 0.64 ± 0.10∗∗## | 19.91 ± 4.46∗# |
| HFD + cCL 100 mg/kg | 9.61 ± 2.28* | 13.12 ± 2.01* | 0.54 ± 0.07 | 20.73 ± 5.21∗# |
| HFD + cCL 300 mg/kg | 10.60 ± 2.23* | 14.58 ± 3.10** | 0.67 ± 0.11∗∗## | 24.23 ± 5.71** |
| HFD + cCL 900 mg/kg | 9.99 ± 3.10* | 14.10 ± 3.81** | 0.56 ± 0.20** | 22.82 ± 3.23** |
Values are means ± S.D. (n = 10), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus ND group, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 versus HFD group.
Figure 2Effects of the wild and cultivated Codonopsis lanceolata extracts on (a) serum total cholesterol, (b) serum triglycerides, (c) serum high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, (d) serum low density lipoprotein-(LDL-) cholesterol levels (mg/dL) in rats. Values are means ± S.D. (n = 10), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus ND group, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 versus HFD group.
Figure 3The effect of wCL on 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. (a) 3T3-L1 cells were differentiated with MDI in the absence or presence of wCL (0, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 mg/mL) for eight days, followed by measurement of lipid contents by Oil Red O staining. (b) Stained oil droplets were dissolved with isopropanol and quantified by spectrophotometric analysis at 510 nm. The results were represented as relative lipid contents. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 by SPSS compared to MDI-treated cells. (c) Expression of C/EBPα and PPARγ mRNA from 3T3-L1 cells as described in (a) was measured by RT-PCR.