Literature DB >> 23818583

Large population solution of the stochastic Luria-Delbruck evolution model.

David A Kessler1, Herbert Levine.   

Abstract

Luria and Delbrück introduced a very useful and subsequently widely adopted framework for quantitatively understanding the emergence of new cellular lineages. Here, we provide an analytical treatment of the fully stochastic version of the model, enabled by the fact that population sizes at the time of measurement are invariably very large and mutation rates are low. We show that the Lea-Coulson generating function describes the "inner solution," where the number of mutants is much smaller than the total population. We find that the corresponding distribution function interpolates between a monotonic decrease at relatively small populations, (compared with the inverse of the mutation probability), whereas it goes over to a Lévy α-stable distribution in the very large population limit. The moments are completely determined by the outer solution, and so are devoid of practical significance. The key to our solution is focusing on the fixed population size ensemble, which we show is very different from the fixed time ensemble due to the extreme variability in the evolutionary process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Landau distribution; mutant distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23818583      PMCID: PMC3718099          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309667110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  An explicit representation of the Luria-Delbrück distribution.

Authors:  W P Angerer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Evolution of resistance during clonal expansion.

Authors:  Yoh Iwasa; Martin A Nowak; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  An elementary approach to modeling drug resistance in cancer.

Authors:  Cristian Tomasetti; Doron Levy
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  A simple formula for obtaining markedly improved mutation rate estimates.

Authors:  Philip Gerrish
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Mean field mutation dynamics and the continuous Luria-Delbrück distribution.

Authors:  Eugene Kashdan; Lorenzo Pareschi
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Mutation and selection in bacterial populations: alternatives to the hypothesis of directed mutation.

Authors:  R E Lenski; M Slatkin; F J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Carcinogenesis modeling: from molecular biology to epidemiology.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  A stochastic model for the origin and treatment of tumors containing drug-resistant cells.

Authors:  A J Coldman; J H Goldie
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Luis A Diaz; Richard T Williams; Jian Wu; Isaac Kinde; J Randolph Hecht; Jordan Berlin; Benjamin Allen; Ivana Bozic; Johannes G Reiter; Martin A Nowak; Kenneth W Kinzler; Kelly S Oliner; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and non-genetic clonal diversity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  James R M Black; Nicholas McGranahan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Scaling solution in the large population limit of the general asymmetric stochastic Luria-Delbrück evolution process.

Authors:  David A Kessler; Herbert Levine
Journal:  J Stat Phys       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Real-time transposable element activity in individual live cells.

Authors:  Neil H Kim; Gloria Lee; Nicholas A Sherer; K Michael Martini; Nigel Goldenfeld; Thomas E Kuhlman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Timing and heterogeneity of mutations associated with drug resistance in metastatic cancers.

Authors:  Ivana Bozic; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Inferring ongoing cancer evolution from single tumour biopsies using synthetic supervised learning.

Authors:  Tom W Ouellette; Philip Awadalla
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  On statistical modeling of sequencing noise in high depth data to assess tumor evolution.

Authors:  Raul Rabadan; Gyan Bhanot; Sonia Marsilio; Nicholas Chiorazzi; Laura Pasqualucci; Hossein Khiabanian
Journal:  J Stat Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  The Cancer Stem Cell Fraction in Hierarchically Organized Tumors Can Be Estimated Using Mathematical Modeling and Patient-Specific Treatment Trajectories.

Authors:  Benjamin Werner; Jacob G Scott; Andrea Sottoriva; Alexander R A Anderson; Arne Traulsen; Philipp M Altrock
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer.

Authors:  Samra Turajlic; Andrea Sottoriva; Trevor Graham; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Dynamics of preventive vs post-diagnostic cancer control using low-impact measures.

Authors:  Andrei R Akhmetzhanov; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Identification of neutral tumor evolution across cancer types.

Authors:  Marc J Williams; Benjamin Werner; Chris P Barnes; Trevor A Graham; Andrea Sottoriva
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 38.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.