Literature DB >> 23818572

Common gene pathways and families altered by DNA methylation in breast and prostate cancers.

Tanya K Day1, Tina Bianco-Miotto.   

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, are widely studied in cancer as they are stable and easy to measure genome wide. DNA methylation changes have been used to differentiate benign from malignant tissue and to predict tumor recurrence or patient outcome. Multiple genome wide DNA methylation studies in breast and prostate cancers have identified genes that are differentially methylated in malignant tissue compared with non-malignant tissue or in association with hormone receptor status or tumor recurrence. Although this has identified potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis, what is highlighted by reviewing these studies is the similarities between breast and prostate cancers. In particular, the gene families/pathways targeted by DNA methylation in breast and prostate cancers have significant overlap and include homeobox genes, zinc finger transcription factors, S100 calcium binding proteins, and potassium voltage-gated family members. Many of the gene pathways targeted by aberrant methylation in breast and prostate cancers are not targeted in other cancers, suggesting that some of these targets may be specific to hormonal cancers. Genome wide DNA methylation profiles in breast and prostate cancers will not only define more specific and sensitive biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis but also identify novel therapeutic targets, which may be direct targets of agents that reverse DNA methylation or which may target novel gene families that are themselves DNA methylation targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; breast; gene regulation; neoplasia; prostate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23818572     DOI: 10.1530/ERC-13-0204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  13 in total

1.  Tumor and serum DNA methylation in women receiving preoperative chemotherapy with or without vorinostat in TBCRC008.

Authors:  Roisin M Connolly; Mary Jo Fackler; Zhe Zhang; Xian C Zhou; Matthew P Goetz; Judy C Boughey; Bridget Walsh; John T Carpenter; Anna Maria Storniolo; Stanley P Watkins; Edward W Gabrielson; Vered Stearns; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  S100 proteins in cancer.

Authors:  Anne R Bresnick; David J Weber; Danna B Zimmer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Promoter methylation status of tumor suppressor genes and inhibition of expression of DNA methyltransferase 1 in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bangqing Liu; Jianfei Song; Jiaqiang Luan; Xiaolin Sun; Jian Bai; Haiyong Wang; Angui Li; Lifei Zhang; Xiaoyan Feng; Zhenzong Du
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-04-26

4.  5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A increase COUP-TFII expression in antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Numan Al-Rayyan; Lacey M Litchfield; Margarita M Ivanova; Brandie N Radde; Alan Cheng; Ahmed Elbedewy; Carolyn M Klinge
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  S100A4 Is Involved in Stimulatory Effects Elicited by the FGF2/FGFR1 Signaling Pathway in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Cells.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Santolla; Marianna Talia; Marcello Maggiolini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  WDR5 Expression Is Prognostic of Breast Cancer Outcome.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Dai; Wenwen Guo; Chunjun Zhan; Xiuxia Liu; Zhonghu Bai; Yankun Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  DNA methylation biomarkers: cancer and beyond.

Authors:  Thomas Mikeska; Jeffrey M Craig
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 8.  Cancer diagnostic classifiers based on quantitative DNA methylation.

Authors:  Attila T Lorincz
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.225

9.  DNA methylation status is more reliable than gene expression at detecting cancer in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  A Paziewska; M Dabrowska; K Goryca; A Antoniewicz; J Dobruch; M Mikula; D Jarosz; L Zapala; A Borowka; J Ostrowski
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  BRCA promoter methylation in sporadic versus BRCA germline mutation-related breast cancers.

Authors:  Shoko Vos; Cathy Beatrice Moelans; Paul Joannes van Diest
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.