Literature DB >> 23818479

Thoughts about conceptual models, theories, and literature reviews.

Jacqueline Fawcett1.   

Abstract

This essay focuses on various types of literature reviews, including scoping reviews, realist reviews, and integrative reviews. As contributions to understanding the state of nursing science about a particular topic, each literature review should be but rarely is guided by a nursing conceptual model, and the research findings should be but rarely are interpreted as theories that were generated or tested. Examples that are exceptions to usual literature reviews are given.

Keywords:  conceptual models; literature review; nursing theories

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23818479     DOI: 10.1177/0894318413489156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Sci Q        ISSN: 0894-3184            Impact factor:   0.883


  3 in total

Review 1.  Toxic Stress and Vulnerable Mothers: A Multilevel Framework of Stressors and Strengths.

Authors:  Eileen M Condon; Lois S Sadler
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Conceptualisation and measurement of adaptation within the Roy adaptation model in chronic care: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Xiyi Wang; Qi Zhang; Jing Shao; Zhihong Ye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A qualitative evidence synthesis of employees' views of workplace smoking reduction or cessation interventions.

Authors:  Christopher Carroll; Jo Rick; Joanna Leaviss; David Fishwick; Andrew Booth
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.